rekinhavoc
Deus Vult
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2007
- Messages
- 18,239
- Likes
- 35,489
I know I could do some light skimming of the thread, but I'd rather someone break it down.
Any immediate impact players?
Did we feel needs?
:hat:
Yeah well my typical week is
Mon-Sun:
Toss daughter in air then catch her 5-10 reps of until I get tired
Squat to pick up daughter every time I need to pick her up
Sit-up with daughter when she jumps on me while I'm laying down ~50 times a day
And for cardio chase daughter until I puke
Likely scenario;
DL: above average / good
LB: above average / good
Secondary: average, with 1-2 good
QB: likely roster filler, but potential
OL: good, 1 top prospect
WR: talented, a bit undersized
TE: athletic project
RB: average, top prospect
Kicker/Punter: potentially excellent
Who emerges as leaders on offense and defense in spring ball?
Who is going to surprise this spring?
Likely scenario;
DL: above average / good
LB: above average / good
Secondary: average, with 1-2 good
QB: likely roster filler, but potential
OL: good, 1 top prospect
WR: talented, a bit undersized
TE: athletic project
RB: average, top prospect
Kicker/Punter: potentially excellent
Joey Freshwater already doing his thing down at FAU...
https://twitter.com/keelangregg98/status/827754943620710401?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
![]()
It was a matter of time... folks now justifying 5* hearts quote... SMH
For the posi-Vols, this is not a negative post. It is a stars matter post. Per the "..cool it with stars" thread. appvol posted the link below from SDS.
13 years of SEC team recruiting rankings rolled into one: No. 6 Tennessee Volunteers - Saturday Down South
In summary:
UT was #14 in national recruiting rankings and #6 in the SEC using 247 composite when it started and Rivals prior to the composite. UT's actual wins average was 7 (rounded) from all seasons following the recruiting period stated of 2002-2014 in the article, which is the period of 2003-2015.
#14 in national recruiting rankings equals upper middle of the pack in the SEC in roster quality. My perception of high quality coaching is that it adds one win per season on average. Most everybody that knows anything about football's perceptions of poor quality coaching deducts one+ wins per season subject to Dools standards. Average coaching is neutral and provides 7-5 and 8-4 seasons with the period's roster quality. There could be all kinds of stats derived from the data. But in general, you are going to see everything from 5 to 10 win seasons with upper middle roster quality and average coaching.
In my mind all of the above proves without a shadow of a doubt that stars matter if the program desires to be a perineal top 10 program. If not, carry on.
It is safe to say that Butch is currently an average coach in the SEC, at UT, and in recruiting based on 5 seasons of work under his belt. That is not to say he cannot become a higher quality coach. It does mean he will need to depend on hiring better developers of talent and recruiters to get there because he does not demonstrate the personal ability to rise above that challenge in recruiting or in the W/L column on his own. Most coaches cannot overcome that. Based on recent and anticipated assistant hires, he appears to be doing what he needs to do in that area to upgrade with the proven ability to recruit (except Canales). The final piece to the puzzle in my mind is whether he will get out of their way and let them do their jobs. He has the right to interject whenever he wants, however, it is not always wise to do so unless requested by the coordinators.
All of this says to me to stay the course with Butch if the trajectory remains stable or moves up. This is especially true with the circus that exists in UT's executive and administrative offices, BOT, and boosters of the university. If Butch is terminated or leaves we all know they would likely botch it up. As many have already posted, 2018 recruiting is crucial to the future of the program as well as Butch's career at UT. So the answer on his ability to win at a higher level should be answered over the next 2-3 years.
Good evaluation.... the problem is we were a dumpster fire in the secondary this year and lost Malone... those two position groups should have been a larger focus or we just didn't seem to be able to recruit well at those places.... DL is a big concern as well.
What is wrong with evaluating it and coming to the conclusion that our lovely local journalists and twitter mafia have blown it out of proportion. I think that he was sending a message to some our signees that even though some think other players are better that we got who we wanted. Now, we had some misses, but he doesn't want to tell his team that, nor should he.
For the posi-Vols, this is not a negative post. It is a stars matter post. Per the "..cool it with stars" thread. appvol posted the link below from SDS.
13 years of SEC team recruiting rankings rolled into one: No. 6 Tennessee Volunteers - Saturday Down South
In summary:
UT was #14 in national recruiting rankings and #6 in the SEC using 247 composite when it started and Rivals prior to the composite. UT's actual wins average was 7 (rounded) from all seasons following the recruiting period stated of 2002-2014 in the article, which is the period of 2003-2015.
#14 in national recruiting rankings equals upper middle of the pack in the SEC in roster quality. My perception of high quality coaching is that it adds one win per season on average. Most everybody that knows anything about football's perceptions of poor quality coaching deducts one+ wins per season subject to Dools standards. Average coaching is neutral and provides 7-5 and 8-4 seasons with the period's roster quality. There could be all kinds of stats derived from the data. But in general, you are going to see everything from 5 to 10 win seasons with upper middle roster quality and average coaching.
In my mind all of the above proves without a shadow of a doubt that stars matter if the program desires to be a perineal top 10 program. If not, carry on.
It is safe to say that Butch is currently an average coach in the SEC, at UT, and in recruiting based on 5 seasons of work under his belt. That is not to say he cannot become a higher quality coach. It does mean he will need to depend on hiring better developers of talent and recruiters to get there because he does not demonstrate the personal ability to rise above that challenge in recruiting or in the W/L column on his own. Most coaches cannot overcome that. Based on recent and anticipated assistant hires, he appears to be doing what he needs to do in that area to upgrade with the proven ability to recruit (except Canales). The final piece to the puzzle in my mind is whether he will get out of their way and let them do their jobs. He has the right to interject whenever he wants, however, it is not always wise to do so unless requested by the coordinators.
All of this says to me to stay the course with Butch if the trajectory remains stable or moves up. This is especially true with the circus that exists in UT's executive and administrative offices, BOT, and boosters of the university. If Butch is terminated or leaves we all know they would likely botch it up. As many have already posted, 2018 recruiting is crucial to the future of the program as well as Butch's career at UT. So the answer on his ability to win at a higher level should be answered over the next 2-3 years.
"Alright Team 121. We didn't get who we wanted in recruiting this year but..... we did get these guys. They are flashy and most of them basically suck according to our crappy fanbase but they are the best I will ever be able to recruit to UT because I am a mediocre coach."
- What the negas expect CBJ to say to the team at the start of fall camp
For the posi-Vols, this is not a negative post. It is a stars matter post. Per the "..cool it with stars" thread. appvol posted the link below from SDS.
13 years of SEC team recruiting rankings rolled into one: No. 6 Tennessee Volunteers - Saturday Down South
In summary:
UT was #14 in national recruiting rankings and #6 in the SEC using 247 composite when it started and Rivals prior to the composite. UT's actual wins average was 7 (rounded) from all seasons following the recruiting period stated of 2002-2014 in the article, which is the period of 2003-2015.
#14 in national recruiting rankings equals upper middle of the pack in the SEC in roster quality. My perception of high quality coaching is that it adds one win per season on average. Most everybody that knows anything about football's perceptions of poor quality coaching deducts one+ wins per season subject to Dools standards. Average coaching is neutral and provides 7-5 and 8-4 seasons with the period's roster quality. There could be all kinds of stats derived from the data. But in general, you are going to see everything from 5 to 10 win seasons with upper middle roster quality and average coaching.
In my mind all of the above proves without a shadow of a doubt that stars matter if the program desires to be a perineal top 10 program. If not, carry on.
It is safe to say that Butch is currently an average coach in the SEC, at UT, and in recruiting based on 5 seasons of work under his belt. That is not to say he cannot become a higher quality coach. It does mean he will need to depend on hiring better developers of talent and recruiters to get there because he does not demonstrate the personal ability to rise above that challenge in recruiting or in the W/L column on his own. Most coaches cannot overcome that. Based on recent and anticipated assistant hires, he appears to be doing what he needs to do in that area to upgrade with the proven ability to recruit (except Canales). The final piece to the puzzle in my mind is whether he will get out of their way and let them do their jobs. He has the right to interject whenever he wants, however, it is not always wise to do so unless requested by the coordinators.
All of this says to me to stay the course with Butch if the trajectory remains stable or moves up. This is especially true with the circus that exists in UT's executive and administrative offices, BOT, and boosters of the university. If Butch is terminated or leaves we all know they would likely botch it up. As many have already posted, 2018 recruiting is crucial to the future of the program as well as Butch's career at UT. So the answer on his ability to win at a higher level should be answered over the next 2-3 years.
It was a matter of time... folks now justifying 5* hearts quote... SMH
What I don't understand is how some of these people enjoy following UT football with this kind of attitude. It must be miserable. I'm a forever optimist when it comes to my hobbies.
I'm excited about the defense next year. It will be the most talented (247 composite) defense Butch has had in his time here. 2nd year in a system where a lot of backups got reps because of injuries. Shoop is a proven coach, too. Last year was a comedy of errors. Injuries and limited reps for backups in a new system. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm always going to be optimistic.
Because there is nothing wrong with it. He has probably come to realize that guts and competitiveness go further than talent.. Seems like we've had some 5 star talents with 1 star hearts. Looks good in recruiting, but bad on the field. Note that he didn't say that he doesn't want 5 star talent too.
What I don't understand is how some of these people enjoy following UT football with this kind of attitude. It must be miserable. I'm a forever optimist when it comes to my hobbies.
I'm excited about the defense next year. It will be the most talented (247 composite) defense Butch has had in his time here. 2nd year in a system where a lot of backups got reps because of injuries. Shoop is a proven coach, too. Last year was a comedy of errors. Injuries and limited reps for backups in a new system. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm always going to be optimistic.
