TrumPutinGate

.

Wait...lol...wait.... so are you saying that using the tax laws, in the legal manner in which they are written, to save money on taxes owed is wrong? Is this just a biased opinion on Trump doing it or on all rich folks doing it?

Cause, well.... bet this rich kid has accountants using some of the very same tax saving codes to her advantage.

The American heir has an estimated net worth of $275 million. She owes her fortune to smart stock investments, substantial property holdings, lucrative endorsement deals with CoverGirl cosmetics. She also owns several restaurants (the “Fat Obama Burger” chain) in Washington, a Football Team (the “Chicago Angels”), has launched her own brand of Vodka (Pure Wonderobama - US), and is tackling the juniors market with a top-selling perfume (With Love from Malia) and a fashion line called “Malia Obama Seduction”.


How utterly unpatriotic of a President's daughter to use capital gains, depreciation, property tax and profit/loss statements allowed by the tax code to save money, right?

The interwebs are a scary place Dynalo.....and my yankee girlfriend is yelling..."get off that site...they're not going to get UN-DUMB" ...oh well ...out of my innate altruism :

https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/bureaus-offices/bureau-consumer-protection

https://www.lifewire.com/top-internet-email-scams-2483614


https://www.yahoo.com/tech/the-11-worst-internet-scams-we-1283163153588278.html

because DAMN boy...you need help and guidance
 
This claim is a hoax...Malia Obama Highest-Paid Heir in the World? : snopes.com

.....There was no truth to this story, which was just another piece of fake news.


Do you people even know how to use the interwebs...


Yes, I can interwebs...it's actually exactly why I rolled with that absolutely inane article about a teenager. It's one of the most ridiculous ones, while still being well put together, that I could find with which to make the intended point. I thought about blue font, but I believe that is more favored in the RF than it is here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
The interwebs are a scary place Dynalo.....and my yankee girlfriend is yelling..."get off that site...they're not going to get UN-DUMB" ...oh well ...out of my innate altruism :

https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/bureaus-offices/bureau-consumer-protection

https://www.lifewire.com/top-internet-email-scams-2483614


https://www.yahoo.com/tech/the-11-worst-internet-scams-we-1283163153588278.html

because DAMN boy...you need help and guidance

Damn boy... that went right over your head and under your knees. Suggest you pay more attention to the overall vibe going on in the PF and get your sarcasm meter recalibrated. Perhaps tho, you are merely to young to comprehend the fine nuances of tongue in cheek humor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
If the FBI says Flynn's phone calls were legitimate, then I'll trust the FBI.

I'll not act like a sniveling little sneak about it, like over half this forum, when it came to the question of Russian hacking.

If Schindler is wrong on this, then that would be the first time, but I suppose it would be proof of the need for multiple sources.

Anyhow, I'll accept this determination, but something tells me that we've not seen the last of Flynn implicated (and possibly even investigated) with shady Kremlin ties.

That man has trouble written all over him.
 
What Vol prof fails to realize is, there are FBI and US Marshalls on this forum. He has made several comments on the Presidents life...

He's lucky he hasn't been charged with a crime. Granted, we can all testify to his insanity plea.

There are numerous things I tolerate on this forum. I give hell, and I receive hell. I could even tolerate you calling me a "pedophile" a few weeks ago, mostly because of how ridiculous it was.

Some days ago I made an unfortunate and accidental choice of words that was admittedly in poor form, especially when coupled with what I should have known would be this forum's overly sensitive reaction to a common English expression. I clarified my position no less than two times and made the proper correction.

At this point, you are perpetuating a lie. You do so either out of negligence or out of malice, perhaps even in a misguided attempt to get me in trouble with the law, even though your claims have no veracity.

If I catch you or any other poster make such a claim again, I will report you to the board. I've never done such or even threatened such an action on here, but this is a serious claim, and I'm not going to tolerate moral degenerates like yourself perpetuating your morally depraved filth.

Also, if I so much as catch you or any other pond scum in here making such vile and baseless accusations of such a serious nature against any member of this board, I will report you. If you so much as even think about doing something like this again, I'll report you as well.

I know I'm no mod's favorite poster, but I suspect none of them will tolerate such behavior also.

If you want to call me or anyone else here names, then have at it. I couldn't care less, but I'm not going to let you continue to perpetuate such baseless, deleterious filth, you moral gnat.
 
There are numerous things I tolerate on this forum. I give hell, and I receive hell. I could even tolerate you calling me a "pedophile" a few weeks ago, mostly because of how ridiculous it was.

Some days ago I made an unfortunate and accidental choice of words that was admittedly in poor form, especially when coupled with what I should have known would be this forum's overly sensitive reaction to a common English expression. I clarified my position no less than two times and made the proper correction.

At this point, you are perpetuating a lie. You do so either out of negligence or out of malice, perhaps even in a misguided attempt to get me in trouble with the law, even though your claims have no veracity.

If I catch you or any other poster make such a claim again, I will report you to the board. I've never done such or even threatened such an action on here, but this is a serious claim, and I'm not going to tolerate moral degenerates like yourself perpetuating your morally depraved filth.

Also, if I so much as catch you or any other pond scum in here making such vile and baseless accusations of such a serious nature against any member of this board, I will report you. If you so much as even think about doing something like this again, I'll report you as well.

I know I'm no mod's favorite poster, but I suspect none of them will tolerate such behavior also.

If you want to call me or anyone else here names, then have at it. I couldn't care less, but I'm not going to let you continue to perpetuate such baseless, deleterious filth, you moral gnat.

Don't wait. Email freak and let him know.

Just so you know, I never referred to you as a pedophile. Insane? Yes. But I never called you a pedophile. You are off your rocker and should seek some R&R. You very much need it.
 
Don't wait. Email freak and let him know.

Just so you know, I never referred to you as a pedophile. Insane? Yes. But I never called you a pedophile. You are off your rocker and should seek some R&R. You very much need it.

Don't get smart with me, you pseudo-tough guy.

You equated me with a pedophile because I refused to believe what you believe specifically on PizzaGate.

There's no need at the moment, but if you pull another stunt like this again, I will.

Your pretentious pious act is clearly just a show, and you have no sense of shame.

You all can think whatever you want about me, but I never would have sunk to such depths of depravity as this in an attempt to "win." You truly are a lowlife.
 
Don't get smart with me, you pseudo-tough guy.

You equated me with a pedophile because I refused to believe what you believe specifically on PizzaGate.

There's no need at the moment, but if you pull another stunt like this again, I will.

Your pretentious pious act is clearly just a show, and you have no sense of shame. You're a joke and a lowlife.

Lmao.
 
There's a lot more there there than 5 phone calls.

Oh, without a doubt.

We're talking about a guy who is a paid Kremlin employee (on public record; not necessarily illegal), has given a pep talk to GRU in person, and thinks the first thing he needs to do come some more Russia sanctions is to call the Russian ambassador multiple times.

The FBI apparently found nothing wrong in those five phone calls, but, as I said, I doubt this is the end of this, unless Donny can put an end to it all.

By the way, what prompted this post of yours?

It was very un-Velo.
 
You better chill out.

He's going to tell his mom what you said, and when she calls your mom you can kiss your Xbox goodbye for a long time.

So I'll mark DancingOutlaw as one down with accusing others, without any facts, of both pedophilia and assassination desires.

Keep dancing that little Appalachian jig, Jesco.
 
It sounded like you were abandoning ship.

So the Twitter says the FBI is snooping around Prague . . .

I'm not abandoning ship. I'm just wrought with emotion over this issue.

It has nothing to do with actively rooting for Trump, Flynn, or any number of his gang to be traitors or conspirators. I wish that they are not, but I believe fully that they are, and I want the truth to be exposed.

My frustration was mostly over the fact that it appears we're in for a long investigation, rather than the quick seizure I wish it had been. This will also muddy the waters when the time comes, which is one reason I argued it would have been best to forestall this inauguration (not the least of which being he and his cohort could somehow tank it).

Anyhow, sounds increasingly like Prague is going to be the epicenter of all these investigations. What went on there?
 
Here's something that's been running through my mind, and I think largely lost in all the admitted morass of these respective investigations.

To put it in its very simplest, harshest terms, we've got Donald, Flynn, Stone, Manafort, and Page all under publicly stated investigations to determine whether or not they're all Russian agents. Again, I say this in the simplest and harshest terms. As far as I know, neither Bannon nor Rudy are officially included in this yet, but I wouldn't be surprised to eventually see either (if not both) brought into the investigation as well.

So, here goes: how did this sordid gang of derelict lowlifes all manage to find one another?

Was it through years of mutual business interests and run-ins?

Or was it through a third party(ies)?

If the latter, was this third party(ies) someone in or affiliated with a United States' government agency?

If so, and this is a big "if," we may have found one or more of our Russian moles.

Just spitballing.

It's hard to imagine that you're blind to such huge leaps of logic.

"Under Investigation" does not mean "guilty of". The strange thing is that you would not have been on McCarthy's side in his red scare McCarthyism, nor would you have been on the Puritans' side and torching witches.

But on the modern McCarthyism... You're an Olympic Level Logical Long-Jumper.
 
It's hard to imagine that you're blind to such huge leaps of logic.

"Under Investigation" does not mean "guilty of". The strange thing is that you would not have been on McCarthy's side in his red scare McCarthyism, nor would you have been on the Puritans' side and torching witches.

But on the modern McCarthyism... You're an Olympic Level Logical Long-Jumper.

Suspensions of logic aside, I am not a government figure.

I'm an anonymous poster on a sports-linked politics forum.

Your analogy sounds great, but it's not even comparable, unless you think my posts on here hold the same weight as statements made by Senators or congressional witch hunts.

Making the claims I've made - with a name assigned to them (and especially as a politician) - publicly at the moment would be reprehensible.

I'm under no such obligations or duties.
 
Suspensions of logic aside, I am not a government figure.

I'm an anonymous poster on a sports-linked politics forum.

Your analogy sounds great, but it's not even comparable, unless you think my posts on here hold the same weight as statements made by Senators or congressional witch hunts.

Making the claims I've made - with a name assigned to them (and especially as a politician) - publicly at the moment would be reprehensible.

I'm under no such obligations or duties.

My point had little to do with the weight of your illogic, and much to do with pointing out the inherent problems with your logic.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top