TrumPutinGate

#276
#276
southgatevol said:
Everyone knows you are a champ with the insults, but can you answer people who ask questions? You can insult me, I am ok with the insults, but answer the questions.
Click to expand...

His attempt, guy who has never insulted anyone on here, is to make light of this and to turn it on the Democrats.

To victim-blame, in other words.

I refuse to be sport to his partisan crap show, although you're welcome to take part.
 
#277
#277
volprof said:
His attempt, guy who has never insulted anyone on here, is to make light of this and to turn it on the Democrats.

To victim-blame, in other words.

I refuse to be sport to his partisan crap show, although you're welcome to take part.
Click to expand...

Victim blame? There has been a democrat in charge of the IC for 16 of the last 24 years so if there are high ranking moles inside our IC there is only 1 party to blame.
 
#278
#278
We have the national security advisor sworn in to office under an investigation to see whether or not he's a Kremlin spy.

For novices, let me break this down: it means that a guy who wouldn't even get an ID card yet (if he were a normal employee) now has access to the nation's top classified secrets.

This is uncharted territory folks, but keep that head in the sand and that butt high in the air. It's a fitting portrait, really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#279
#279
volprof said:
We have the national security advisor sworn in to office under an investigation to see whether or not he's a Kremlin spy.

For novices, let me break this down: it means that a guy who wouldn't even get an ID card yet (if he were a normal employee) now has access to the nation's top classified secrets.

This is uncharted territory folks, but keep that head in the sand and that butt high in the air. It's a fitting portrait, really.
Click to expand...

We came close to having a POTUS that the same could be said about.
 
#280
#280
volprof said:
We have the national security advisor sworn in to office under an investigation to see whether or not he's a Kremlin spy.

For novices, let me break this down: it means that a guy who wouldn't even get an ID card yet (if he were a normal employee) now has access to the nation's top classified secrets.

This is uncharted territory folks, but keep that head in the sand and that butt high in the air. It's a fitting portrait, really.
Click to expand...

More insane babbling coming from the clown champ of insults.
 
#281
#281
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
More insane babbling coming from the clown champ of insults.
Click to expand...

Since "but what about...?" is en vogue here, I'd like to know where you anti-bully posters are whenever one of your totally not a bully friends is attacking rational posters as snowflakes, *******, retards, etc.

I may be an insult king when it comes to rebuffing deplorable behavior on here, but at least I'm honest with myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#282
#282
volprof said:
Since "but what about...?" is en vogue here, I'd like to know where you anti-bully posters are whenever one of your totally not a bully friends is attacking rational posters as snowflakes, *******, retards, etc.

I may be an insult king when it comes to rebuffing deplorable behavior on here, but at least I'm honest with myself.
Click to expand...

Now that is funny.
 
#283
#283
volprof said:
People who have no clue how any of this works (i.e., most Americans) will of course think the CIA was seriously cheering for Trump against the press like teenagers at a metal concert. In that case, missions accomplished Team Trump.
Click to expand...

I doubt 5% of Americans even saw that.
 
#284
#284
Velo Vol said:
I doubt 5% of Americans even saw that.
Click to expand...

True, but the point remains.

Hey, if you get a chance, check out that blog I linked earlier about Putin and "chess." The Patribotics one.

That piece was written by one of Schindler's cohort, although I'm unsure what exactly her official links (if any) are to the IC.

I imagine some of it is sensational, but, as I said earlier, if any of it is true, it may spell the end of the GOP. Like, forever "end," not temporary "end."
 
#287
#287
Here's something that's been running through my mind, and I think largely lost in all the admitted morass of these respective investigations.

To put it in its very simplest, harshest terms, we've got Donald, Flynn, Stone, Manafort, and Page all under publicly stated investigations to determine whether or not they're all Russian agents. Again, I say this in the simplest and harshest terms. As far as I know, neither Bannon nor Rudy are officially included in this yet, but I wouldn't be surprised to eventually see either (if not both) brought into the investigation as well.

So, here goes: how did this sordid gang of derelict lowlifes all manage to find one another?

Was it through years of mutual business interests and run-ins?

Or was it through a third party(ies)?

If the latter, was this third party(ies) someone in or affiliated with a United States' government agency?

If so, and this is a big "if," we may have found one or more of our Russian moles.

Just spitballing.
 
#288
#288
Anonymous is coming off the top rope.
 

Attachments

  • C2UlPd1XUAERPZe.jpg
    C2UlPd1XUAERPZe.jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 0
  • C2UlPd1WEAAkx9b.jpg
    C2UlPd1WEAAkx9b.jpg
    54.7 KB · Views: 0
#289
#289
volprof said:
We have the national security advisor sworn in to office under an investigation to see whether or not he's a Kremlin spy.

For novices, let me break this down: it means that a guy who wouldn't even get an ID card yet (if he were a normal employee) now has access to the nation's top classified secrets.

This is uncharted territory folks, but keep that head in the sand and that butt high in the air. It's a fitting portrait, really.
Click to expand...

For real? Are you for real? You wanted an actual president who would be in prison and wouldn't even get a secret clearance if it were anyone other than Hillary Clinton.
 
#291
#291
carlos86 said:
Anonymous is coming off the top rope.
Click to expand...

It's always good to see people getting serious about this, unlike VolNation, but I don't want outside third parties, especially if they're not Americans.

I want it done proper by our own IC and Justice Dept., preferably.

I'm not a cynic who cheers on outside parties attacks of our democracy, like this bunch around here.
 
#292
#292
carlos86 said:
Anonymous is coming off the top rope.
Click to expand...

For the record, for initiates here who may genuinely be concerned by the possibility that our president is in collusion with the Kremlin, rather than seeing it as fodder for snarky jokes, when Anonymous criticizes Trump for having illegal dealings with the Russian mob, that is essentially the same thing as claiming he has illegal dealings with the Russian FSB. Russian organized crime and the FSB are nearly indistinguishable. The FSB often uses the Russian OC for intel and hitjobs.
 
#293
#293
volprof said:
To put it in its very simplest, harshest terms, we've got Donald, Flynn, Stone, Manafort, and Page all under publicly stated investigations to determine whether or not they're all Russian agents. Again, I say this in the simplest and harshest terms. As far as I know, neither Bannon nor Rudy are officially included in this yet, but I wouldn't be surprised to eventually see either (if not both) brought into the investigation as well.

So, here goes: how did this sordid gang of derelict lowlifes all manage to find one another?
Click to expand...

I suspect Trump and Rudy bumped into one another somewhere along the way.
 
#294
#294
Velo Vol said:
I suspect Trump and Rudy bumped into one another somewhere along the way.
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree. That relationship is of least question.

The others, particularly Flynn, Page, and Manafort, not so much.

I want to know how they all came into contact, and I suspect much smarter individuals than you and me have already been looking into this.
 
#300
#300
tumscalcium said:
Explain how it's bad for a trump advisor but not for Hillary Clinton herself. Please, explain what you think.
Click to expand...

I know you have difficulty with literacy, but you need to have read my post.

I didn't state she was my ideal candidate. I told you, instead, that that's what I think about Donald Trump, the man you support but didn't have enough guts to vote for.

Neither Hillary nor Donald would have even passed the first round of the security clearance process for federal employees. But I only had two options, and I went with the far more transparent one who most likely isn't a Russian operative.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement










Back
Top