Question for those voting for Hillary Clinton

#51
#51
TN Ribs said:
I agree 100%, it's not even a difficult choice when you compare the two. I could pile-on with more of Trump's transgressions, nonsensical policies, and racist/sexist rants but there simply isn't enough time in the day.
Click to expand...

It's the simplest decision in American presidential election history, yet we're treating it like it's a serious debate.

The moment CNN legitimized that joke of a campaign by having one of its relativistic, "there is no truth" surrogates sit on a panel just so CNN could get its ratings fill, American democracy took a step in the wrong direction. They shouldn't have even given that clown and his circus act the time of day. Instead, they legitimized it, as if it was something serious, and here we are having one of the dumbest debates in American history: which is better, Clinton or Trump?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#52
#52
hog88 said:
So you are comfortable with Hillary starting wars and making foreign policy decisions based on personal profitability.
Click to expand...


I think you are exaggerating the situation. I AM a fan of the Clinton Foundation doing a lot of the work it does. Many GOPers over the years have joined forces with the CF and I do not see any of them running away from that, largely because they know that a lot of what you say is baseless hyperbole.

I am NOT a fan of the Clintons ending up getting rich off of the intersection of the Clinton Foundation, his post as POTUS, her position in the Senate and then SoS, etc. But I simply do not see evidence that she started a war to personally benefit.

When you make claims like that, I think it hurts your credibility.


Orangedogsrule said:
So you're OK with the Hildabeast's "arming to the teeth" of Saudi Arabia? The jet fighters and tools of war, the 11 million Clinton Fund 'gifts' as a result and now Saudi use of at least part of these to make war in Yemen on the Houtha. This when we know Saudi backs ISIS. You're good with Clinton helping weaponize that "flareup"?
Click to expand...

Do you realize that, when you use the word "Hildabeast" you immediately cause the reader to assume that your bias is so complete you cannot process fact? That you are likely relying on the blogosphere, and pretty crappy parts of it for that matter, for your information?

Honestly, why do you think the name calling helps you make an argument? It makes you look immature and childish, and cause people to doubt your credibility and the factual basis for anything you say.

I don't get it.
 
#53
#53
volprof said:
That's essentially the argument that is made, and it makes no sense. Of course he hasn't done all the things she's done, because he hasn't had the opportunity yet. Anyone who thinks he'll behave any differently is either a fool or a stooge.

So, all things being equal, I'll take the tax payer, the more professional one, the more composed one, and the sane one, which is Hillary Clinton.

And I'll take her a thousand times over Gropey Don and not even think twice about it.
Click to expand...

Trump is a typical East coast blow hard with a big mouth and a bigger ego. People so taken a back by him obviously have never spent any time on the East coast dealing with these types of people.

But, what is astounding is that as is highlighted in bold, you state it correctly, he HAS NOT done the things she has, and just to say that YOU KNOW he would given the opportunity is false. You don't know that anymore than I think that he would not.

Look, he is a public figure and has been for a long time, and being as wealthy as he is no matter how gratuitous he is to all political movements, he is and has been a target and what is the worst thing that is PROVABLE and concrete against him.......nothing close as to what is known about this mega c***.

Understand you have someone who because of his mouth, and because of the slanted democratic media, will not be able to run his Presidency as hiliary has been able to keep her covert, mass cooperated, multi level crime syndicate. He is a walking target and will not have the same luxury as hiliary.

So, I have a womanizing loud mouth who sometimes thinks with the wrong head or doesn't take the time to stop and listen to the big one before opening his mouth, versus clinton.....as you said, HE HAS NOT DONE THE THINGS SHE HAS DONE.

tax payer---no---let me see, a billionaire business man or a Clinton, who would the IRS spend their time investigating and looking for any chance to nail an arse to the wall.........yeah not even close, the more professional one.....seriously, she is as far from professional as can be imagined, the more composed one.....easy to be when you are a robot and never have your real feelings and words come out just scripted and repeated works from teams of people helping, and the sane one.....I don't think anyone is sane anymore.

I'm past the point of caring or even giving a shiite about this mess. Vote how you want, you will have to live with it down the road. I'll be living it up in my compound in St. Maarten and give two iota's about anything except my family and friends who are more than welcome to come down and settle in whenever they want.

F*** hiliary
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#54
#54
lawgator1 said:
I think you are exaggerating the situation. I AM a fan of the Clinton Foundation doing a lot of the work it does. Many GOPers over the years have joined forces with the CF and I do not see any of them running away from that, largely because they know that a lot of what you say is baseless hyperbole.

I am NOT a fan of the Clintons ending up getting rich off of the intersection of the Clinton Foundation, his post as POTUS, her position in the Senate and then SoS, etc. But I simply do not see evidence that she started a war to personally benefit.

When you make claims like that, I think it hurts your credibility.
Click to expand...

Starting a war was hyperbole on my part but with the Clintons it's not out of the realm of possibility. I don't think much is out of bounds for them when it comes to riches and power.

I will admit that the CF has probably done some good work it has been used for their personal enrichment also which in anyway you look at it is wrong. Especially since they both used their public office for personal profit.
 
#57
#57
volprof said:
If I thought Donald Trump, whose charity is a proven slush fund
Click to expand...
So Bill and HiLIARy have turned their public service salaries into multi million dollar wealth.

Hmmmm.


Maybe they should be investing for all of America.

After all, the CF does great works, right? :crazy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#58
#58
A very serious question for those considering voting for Hillary.




You must consider whether or not you really want to see the Faces of Hillary and Chelsea Clinton every day for four years, or to look upon the faces of Melinia and Ivanka Trump for four years.

Remember, it will be four long years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#59
#59
Franklin Pierce said:
A very serious question for those considering voting for Hillary.




You must consider whether or not you really want to see the Faces of Hillary and Chelsea Clinton every day for four years, or to look upon the faces of Melinia and Ivanka Trump for four years.

Remember, it will be four long years.
Click to expand...


Id rather see all the Clintons in jail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#60
#60
Here's why people are voting for the LIAR.
200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#61
#61
I'm voting for Hillary because my first choice is not on the ballot. It's going to be Hillary or Trump. I'll take Hillary every time. For starters (and there's so much more) Trump is a sexual predator, the worst kind of criminal. You may say he's not been convicted. Well, neither has Hillary. So that's a wash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#63
#63
Barak Obama on Crooked Hillary:

“‘She’s tired, she’s moody, she’s being emotional. There’s something about her.’ When men are ambitious, it’s taken for granted. When women are ambitious, it’s ‘why?’ That theme will continue throughout her presidency, and it’s contributed to this notion that somehow she is hiding something.”
 
#64
#64
I don't want Hillary in the White House but Trump really concerns me with his cozy attitude toward Putin and Russia. He looks like he really would be Putin's patsy and very easy to manipulate. That is why I will vote for her. Also, I have a feeling that a big reason he refuses to release his tax returns is because he has lied over the years about how much he has actually donated to charity. It is a fact that he attended a ribbon cutting ceremony for the opening of a school for children with HIV in 1996 and sat in a donor's chair when he had not actually donated any money for it or even been invited. What kind of person does that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#65
#65
MT LeConte said:
I'm voting for Hillary because my first choice is not on the ballot. It's going to be Hillary or Trump. I'll take Hillary every time. For starters (and there's so much more) Trump is a sexual predator, the worst kind of criminal. You may say he's not been convicted. Well, neither has Hillary. So that's a wash.
Click to expand...

Congrats, says alot about a person that approves going into WW3.

Blame it on the Russians, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#67
#67
Curious: how many of you actually think he's going to build the wall between Mexico and the U.S.?
 
#68
#68
MT LeConte said:
I'm voting for Hillary because my first choice is not on the ballot. It's going to be Hillary or Trump. I'll take Hillary every time. For starters (and there's so much more) Trump is a sexual predator, the worst kind of criminal. You may say he's not been convicted. Well, neither has Hillary. So that's a wash.
Click to expand...

Say wut? Wrong family pops..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5800.JPG
    IMG_5800.JPG
    126.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#70
#70
Roustabout said:
I will agree, Rand Paul is the best, but I don't see him being libertarian with the abortion issue.
Click to expand...

Austin Petersen is also pro life. But he is pro life across the board, as in no death penalty. IIRC, he said listening to Ron Paul changed his opinion on abortion.

That said, if that were the party platform, I could see Rand making that move if the GOP ends up in a million pieces.
 
#75
#75
BowlBrother85 said:
I don't want Hillary in the White House but Trump really concerns me with his cozy attitude toward Putin and Russia. He looks like he really would be Putin's patsy and very easy to manipulate. That is why I will vote for her. Also, I have a feeling that a big reason he refuses to release his tax returns is because he has lied over the years about how much he has actually donated to charity. It is a fact that he attended a ribbon cutting ceremony for the opening of a school for children with HIV in 1996 and sat in a donor's chair when he had not actually donated any money for it or even been invited. What kind of person does that?
Click to expand...

Except that the FBI has stated they have not found any ties whatsoever to Russia or Putin, but hey keep believing the hype.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top