2016 Election

[VolsNSkinsFan]

It's interesting to see Trump & Hillarys Twitter accounts. Both have the same amount of followers but Trumps posts get a lot more likes. Hillary usually gets around 1000 likes while Trump routinely gets above 3000 and has a couple of posts in the past 24 hrs that have 5k, 10k & 30k likes. Just an observation

 

[MG1968]

Well, the Germans bombed the Lusitania... we went to war with Germany.

The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor... we went to war with Japan.

19 Saudis attacked the Twin Towers on 9/11... we invade Afghanistan and Iraq.

You do understand the difference between an organized military that is acting under the orders of an acknowledged national leader and a group of religious fanatics carrying out an attack on soft targets?

 

[lawgator1]

You do understand the difference between an organized military that is acting under the orders of an acknowledged national leader and a group of religious fanatics carrying out an attack on soft targets?

That's why you have to just laugh at suggestions we can go attack some specific piece of land, or some defined group of people, and "win."

 

[Grand Vol]

That's why you have to just laugh at suggestions we can go attack some specific piece of land, or some defined group of people, and "win."

I'm still waiting on a rational explanation of why the DNC thought having a debate on a Saturday during football season would be a good idea.

 

[FLVOL_79]

I'm still waiting on a rational explanation of why the DNC thought having a debate on a Saturday during football season would be a good idea.

They are out of touch with reality. It happens when your ticket is compromised of senior citizens.

 

[volfanhill]

I'm still waiting on a rational explanation of why the DNC thought having a debate on a Saturday during football season would be a good idea.

Hillary is dictating what she wants to the DNC. That's why they are having only a few debates in the first place. Her campaign wants as little chance for attack as possible.

 

[Gramps]

I'm still waiting on a rational explanation of why the DNC thought having a debate on a Saturday during football season would be a good idea.

I still waiting for a reason to have a 2016 Dem primary debate period. Hillary is going to be the Dem nominee by a very large number, everyone in the USA knows that, including Bernie

 

[1972 Grad]

They are out of touch with reality. It happens when your ticket is compromised of senior citizens.

Some of us still get it. It's not their age. It's their politics. They are over the hill hippies.

 

[lawgator1]

I'm still waiting on a rational explanation of why the DNC thought having a debate on a Saturday during football season would be a good idea.

No one was going to watch anyway. Why waste a valuable American Idol slot?

 

[lawgator1]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

 

[allvol123]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

You prove that possible daily.

 

[MercyPercy]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

why do you watch fox so much

 

[FLVOL69]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

Even if that were true it's still more of a strategy than Barry's "ride out the term" plan.

 

[volfanhill]

why do you watch fox so much

well he can't spend his entire Sunday on youporn

 

[1972 Grad]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

What answer would have satisfied you?

 

[Grand Vol]

well he can't spend his entire Sunday on youporn

Says who?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I'm still waiting on a rational explanation of why the DNC thought having a debate on a Saturday during football season would be a good idea.

It's painfully obvious to me. They know nobody is going to be watching, and the coronation of the queen ***** can go on right on schedule

 

[Jxn Vol]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

He could have gone with blaming a YouTube video.

 

[1972 Grad]

He could have gone with blaming a YouTube video.

That's usually good for a week or two.

 

[Jxn Vol]

That's usually good for a week or two.

At that point

"what difference does it make?"

 

[1972 Grad]

At that point

"what difference does it make?"

At least she has a better hairdo now.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Interesting that no one wanted to respond to this.....

Probably because no one really gave a ****

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Probably because no one really gave a ****

:lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove:

 

[IBlvNTmWrk]

Was just listening to Carson interviewed on Fox. Asked repeatedly what he would specifically do about this, he had word salad answer. Zero responsiveness. In fact, arguably his answers were a net negative, if that's possible.

Just curious, but which answer do you think was worse... Carson's word salad or Hillary invoking 9/11 as the reason she takes donations from wall street?

And please take a minute to think about your answer because I'm sure you have multiple posts regarding Christie speaking of 9/11, and maybe even going back to Giuliani.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

I've told you before, the national origin of the attackers has little to do with their ideology. The 1993 WTC attackers were: Kuwaiti (staunch ally of ours), Egyptian (until recent times, a fairly reliable ally of ours), Jordan or possibly Palestinian (West Bank, so could be either), Iraqi (at the time an enemy) and being funded by either a man of Pakistani or Kuwaiti decent.

Or the USS Cole which was masterminded by a man of Yemeni decent and carried out by Yemeni nationals.

And the Khobar Towers bombing which was masterminded by several Saudis and with Lebanese help. All of which fled Saudi Arabia soon after the bombing.

These are just incidents prior to the 9/11 attacks that followed no national guidance and had no borders. Afghanistan and Iraq both provided bases of operation for these groups. As did Libya. So while wanting to implicate the Saudi nation for promoting terrorism, where are the bases of operation for these groups?

It's a huge difference in a nation state declaring war on us or attacking our interests and a group without borders doing it.

There seems to be a a whole hell of a lot more smoke circling Saudi Arabia than Iran, yet we have been calling Iran a member of the axis of evil for 15 years...

Saudis/Sunnis have killed more Americans than Iranians/Shiites in the last 15 years.