Official Global Warming thread (merged)

#5,702
#5,702
VolsNSkinsFan said:
Yea your data has to be adjusted so you can beat records by 0.01.
Click to expand...
We’ve explained the adjustments ad nauseam. They've been vetted by the scientific community, including several 'skeptics'. And even without the adjustments, the trend is the same.

If the numbers are fabricated, why would they only beat the record by .01 (an inaccurate figure anyway, but that’s beside the point)?

And how can people claim the numbers are fabricated, but then also point to the same numbers and say, “See, global warming stopped 17 years ago!”

wpid-wp-1414198682837.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,707
#5,707
BartW said:
We’ve explained the adjustments ad nauseam. They've been vetted by the scientific community, including several 'skeptics'. And even without the adjustments, the trend is the same.

If the numbers are fabricated, why would they only beat the record by .01 (an inaccurate figure anyway, but that’s beside the point)?

And how can people claim the numbers are fabricated, but then also point to the same numbers and say, “See, global warming stopped 17 years ago!”

wpid-wp-1414198682837.png
Click to expand...

NASA and NOAA haven't even explained the adjustments so how did you do it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,715
#5,715
Grand Vol said:
Oh, and in before Bart says that scientist was bought by big tobacco or something along those lines.
Click to expand...

BartW said:
Lol at the title. He's a petrochemical engineer writing in E&E. He says the rise in atmospheric CO2 isn't even a result of fossil fuel combustion...

:sleep:
Click to expand...

Grand Vol said:
Nailed it.
Click to expand...

BartW said:
hardly
Click to expand...

Yeah, I hardly got close to you implying they were bought and paid for by big oil. I may have used "big tobacco" yet that's more of a barb at you more than anything.
 
#5,716
#5,716
Grand Vol said:
Yeah, I hardly got close to you implying they were bought and paid for by big oil. I may have used "big tobacco" yet that's more of a barb at you more than anything.
Click to expand...
I didn't have to imply anything. His career is in coal. His climate opinions are nonsense. The paper is in E&E. Even professional climate skeptics don't give a ****.

Are you actually standing by the dude or is this just another barb?
 
#5,717
#5,717
BartW said:
Are you actually standing by the dude or is this just another barb?
Click to expand...

More of a personal barb at you. Any contradictory information that goes against your deeply seated views is automatically wrong in your world. You can't even address what he wrote about before dismissing it entirely.

Yes Virginia, I nailed it spot on that you would dismiss the article as being nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,718
#5,718
Grand Vol said:
More of a personal barb at you. Any contradictory information that goes against your deeply seated views is automatically wrong in your world. You can't even address what he wrote about before dismissing it entirely.

Yes Virginia, I nailed it spot on that you would dismiss the article as being nonsense.
Click to expand...

Are you guys married or something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,720
#5,720
Grand Vol said:
More of a personal barb at you.
Click to expand...
Thought so
Grand Vol said:
Any contradictory information that goes against your deeply seated views is automatically wrong in your world. You can't even address what he wrote about before dismissing it entirely.

Yes Virginia, I nailed it spot on that you would dismiss the article as being nonsense.
Click to expand...
I calls ‘em like I sees ‘em. Aren’t you now agreeing that it is indeed nonsense?

Considering your initial reaction to the story, I find it pretty rich that you'd complain about confirmation bias
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top