oryankees
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,439
- Likes
- 1,188
You're making assumptions. It's mainly territorial because some coaches have more relationships in certain areas and it's more efficient to send them on trips into an area rather then them going all over the country. That's not to say that the position coach is completely out of it, but recruiting's all about relationships.
Source: Inside The T Mailbag: The Barrel - UTSPORTS.COM - University of Tennessee Athletics
For example for Drew Richmond, the primary recruiter is Mark Elder and the secondary is Mahoney. So Elder will be the one that calls Richmond everyday and the one who'll have established a relationship with Richmond. That's not to say that Mahoney's not a part of it but it's not primarily in contact with him. Also it's worth noting that Butch is actually more involved directly in recruiting than coaches normally which is why he's been so successful at recruiting.
Source: Drew Richmond Recruit Interests
Another example, Thigpen's actually Allen's lead recruiter and Mahoney is secondary.
Source: Patrick Allen Recruit Interests
So no, position coaches ARE NOT the lead recruiters for their positions. So YOU were saying what exactly, now?
This is the VN way. No one gets credit for Robertson because someone thinks he was privy to the discussion that he was recruited only as a defensive lineman. Then, speculate that Mosley would be elite on the DL. Only here.
The main recruiters are not cut and dry either. I believe Elder had the most to do with recruiting Tuttle, and he isn't his position coach. There are other regions where coaches have influence, like Gillespie in the Atlanta area. Just not simply that all players are recruited by their position coaches.
I never said we haven't recruited a LT prospect, I said we didn't have a true LT prospect. I also was talking about this class only. I thought the Allen/St.Louis to Hall comparison was a dead give away of that.
Also, who's to blame for the "all in" recruitment of Brown when he couldn't qualify? Who's to blame when Richmond used UT after we slow played everyone for him? The circumstances for the lack of OT recruiting by this staff will soon become an unacceptable excuse for our struggles on the OL. In 2.5 years we have recruited two true OTs, Blair and Kendrick. That's not acceptable. Last time I checked, we don't obtain brownie points for our effort on the recruiting trail. I know this staff works hard; however, our OT recruiting is subpar so far. In terms of OT recruiting, we aren't playing checkers or chess, we are playing Russian Roulette with a bullet in one of the chambers. If Blair doesn't work out, and we don't obtain another OT this recruiting class, we might be in serious trouble.
So, that's why he needed to keep his own OL recruits on the bench in favor of a DT recruit...who happens to be a true freshman himself....and having to do the same for another DT recruit (Mosley) from the same class, this spring?OL is position that requires development. Rarely do freshmen come in and dominate. So yes, it can be traced back to the previous administration. Unfortunately we can't judge his recruiting prowess until 16.
If you think the position coach isn't calling the shots about who HE wants and doesn't want, you are delusional. IT IS THEIR JOB. They don't have to be the front man. They compile a list of players they want to pursue and the coaches covering those players make initial contact, but at some point, the position coach gets involved.This is the VN way. No one gets credit for Robertson because someone thinks he was privy to the discussion that he was recruited only as a defensive lineman. Then, speculate that Mosley would be elite on the DL. Only here.
The main recruiters are not cut and dry either. I believe Elder had the most to do with recruiting Tuttle, and he isn't his position coach. There are other regions where coaches have influence, like Gillespie in the Atlanta area. Just not simply that all players are recruited by their position coaches.
You don't have a clue yourself, so what the hell are you talking about? When you hear recruits talk about the specifics of their recruitment, 9 times out of 10 you will hear them mention they "stay in touch with...".....wait for it....wait for it............their position coach.Thank you, Sir. I hate when people have absolutely no idea what they are talking about but act like their flawed opinion is the truth. Unfortunately happens way to much on here.
If you think the position coach isn't calling the shots about who HE wants and doesn't want, you are delusional. IT IS THEIR JOB. They don't have to be the front man. They compile a list of players they want to pursue and the coaches covering those players make initial contact, but at some point, the position coach gets involved.
You hear it from recruits all the time, talking predominantly about their position coach and how they "stay in touch." So, don't try to sell me on this BS line that other coaches are just as responsible for the failure or success. They are not. They play a minor role in the larger scheme of things.
The position coaches are the lead recruiter in 90% of all recruits. Butch is one of the few coaches who works as a lead recruiter.
We all know other coaches recruit some outside of their own group. That's not news, nor is it contrary to the point that the Position coach is the chief shot-caller for his individual group. He's responsible for the success of his group, so it's incumbent upon him to be heavily involved in the process.No reason to discuss with someone who thinks they know it all. I never said that the position coach wasn't involved. Just that they aren't always the primary recruiter. Sure, they make plenty of contact because that is who will coach the recruit. But, it has been publicly stated that Coach Elder has been the integral reason why Tuttle is going to UT. Stripling was instrumental with Chance Hall, who will be an OL. Gillespie has recruited Quarte Sapp in Atlanta. Not all the same positions. I would think the recruits are evaluated and ranked as a staff, but I guess I will defer to those who think they know more.
But I think Blair will work out and we will sign one or two more OL to this class and we will be fine. Blair will play 2 years giving us time to see what we have in this class and who has potential in the next class. It's a concern but you're panicking way too soon. You have already given up after one full class by this staff. Lol
We all know other coaches recruit some outside of their own group. That's not news, nor is it contrary to the point that the Position coach is the chief shot-caller for his individual group. He's responsible for the success of his group, so it's incumbent upon him to be heavily involved in the process.
Sure, CBJ and the Coordinators have more ultimate say, but it's like any corporate structure, the executives let the managers beneath take care of their responsibilities without trying to micro-manage things.
So, once more, as a practical example, Gillespie will have a group of RB's he likes and feels fits the team's need the best. Sure CBJ and Bajakian have a great deal of input into the decisions, but they largely let him run the show, seeing that it's his position group and his ultimate responsibility.
So, it all comes back to Mahoney. He is ultimately responsible for his position group. Not just coaching...but recruiting, as well. His success or failure is largely contingent upon his ability to acquire the talent needed for his group to fulfill their role on the team.
This year, his group was grossly deficient. His job as OC coach won't survive another season like 2014. Recruiting like he has been won't help him keep his job. It's as simple as that.
We all know other coaches recruit some outside of their own group. That's not news, nor is it contrary to the point that the Position coach is the chief shot-caller for his individual group. He's responsible for the success of his group, so it's incumbent upon him to be heavily involved in the process.
Sure, CBJ and the Coordinators have more ultimate say, but it's like any corporate structure, the executives let the managers beneath take care of their responsibilities without trying to micro-manage things.
So, once more, as a practical example, Gillespie will have a group of RB's he likes and feels fits the team's need the best. Sure CBJ and Bajakian have a great deal of input into the decisions, but they largely let him run the show, seeing that it's his position group and his ultimate responsibility.
So, it all comes back to Mahoney. He is ultimately responsible for his position group. Not just coaching...but recruiting, as well. His success or failure is largely contingent upon his ability to acquire the talent needed for his group to fulfill their role on the team.
This year, his group was grossly deficient. His job as OL coach won't survive another season like 2014. Recruiting like he has been won't help him keep his job. It's as simple as that.
No reason to discuss with someone who thinks they know it all. I never said that the position coach wasn't involved. Just that they aren't always the primary recruiter. Sure, they make plenty of contact because that is who will coach the recruit. But, it has been publicly stated that Coach Elder has been the integral reason why Tuttle is going to UT. Stripling was instrumental with Chance Hall, who will be an OL. Gillespie has recruited Quarte Sapp in Atlanta. Not all the same positions. I would think the recruits are evaluated and ranked as a staff, but I guess I will defer to those who think they know more.
