CountVolcula
Eternal Vol
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 32,488
- Likes
- 19,827
Reagan did not have people sniping at him 24/7. The economy was NOWHERE near as bad as the one Obama inherited.
And yet, if this recovery continues, it will be the greatest economic salvage in modern history. I know you hate to admit you were wrong. Sure looks like you were.
The debt wasn't completely raised because of spending. (Defense)
Reagan increased the debt through tax cuts. Which in return boosted the economy.
That's like taking out a bunch of credit cards and claiming you've fixed your money problems. Taking on debt my help short term, but it has very negative long term consequences
Agreed. It has negative long term consequences
Reagan spent 2 trillion dollars in 8 years. Most of that was tax cuts. Not actually writing a check.
Obama has spent roughly 8 trillion in 6 years and his 2013 budget outlines 47 TRILLION over the next 10 years.
We don't have have the money.
Agreed. It has negative long term consequences
Reagan spent 2 trillion dollars in 8 years. Most of that was tax cuts. Not actually writing a check.
Obama has spent roughly 8 trillion in 6 years and his 2013 budget outlines 47 TRILLION over the next 10 years.
We don't have have the money.
The math doesn't show this. It has increased by 70% since him taking office.
Have you seen what our taxes are going to next year?
Outside of the end to the bush tax cuts, there are no new increases I'm aware of. I do know that my wife and I are trying to avoid that next income bracket (somewhere between 75-80k I think).
You might want to think about that some more. Don't avoid more money to save taxes unless there is > 100% tax (which there isn't). Might be different if you are planning on deferring income for some other planning reasons. If you and your wife cross over into the 25% bracket at $74,900 in 2015, its only the dollars above that line that taxed at 25%.
