hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 121,857
- Likes
- 180,708
But on Friday, as the Kurdish pesh merga fighters approached the city to greet the residents they helped save, they were treated less like liberators and more like intruders. Pesh merga forces are not allowed to enter this city! yelled a Shiite militiaman with Kataib Hezbollah, an Iraqi group. He waved his rifle at them and the pesh merga retreated.
We fought for three months here, and now we have to fight these bastards, said one of the pesh merga, who regard this area as part of their territory. If this continues, well have another war.
They are just like animals, said a second pesh merga fighter. They are mules.
A coalition of Nato allies is ready to join the United States in military action against Islamic State (IS), US President Obama has announced.
Speaking at the Nato summit in Wales, he said that a "core coalition" had been formed to tackle the threat.
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the group would be the US, Britain, Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Turkey.
A new "Coalition of the Willing" has been formed BBC News - Obama: Nato coalition ready to join US against IS
When confronted by complex problems as the US is now in Iraq and Syria sometimes the best strategy is to do nothing at all. The problem may go away or burn itself out.
Does this reporter also miss that plenty of Democrats are calling for strikes as well?
But this caught my eye:
We can all wish things may happen, but it doesn't make it reality. And reality is if ISIS continued to grow stronger without US aid, where would they be now?
So the question to you is, do you think they are going to be content to just sit on their little frog pad in the Middle East?
Further on this as I'm on cup of coffee #2...
Those that attempt to make this into a right versus left debate are missing the central points. This isn't about a conservative versus liberal mentality if we should be involved. Plenty on both sides are calling for action or inaction so reporters that try to play the political angle are doing little but swaying the attention away from the group itself. And missing the overall principle that it's now or later.
Does Obama get a lot of blame for not having a coherent plan on ISIS? He does and that's not indicative of his political beliefs. That's more of a spotlight on his ineptitude and complete lack of ability to perform his duties as POTUS. So as soon as a reporter starts in on the "conservatives are bad and want to strike!" I lose all interest as the individual has zero clue what they are talking about and are doing little more than seeking attention.
In a nation that's politically polar opposites on many things, ISIS is not about (R) versus (D). It's far less murky than most things political.
