- Joined
- Jul 12, 2012
- Messages
- 37,766
- Likes
- 15,696
this bill doesn't protect, it encourages
I have yet to see what's wrong with that?
Being religious should not be used to discriminate against any person.
If billy chooses to pray before lunch, so be it. If Jill wants to say a prayer at graduation, so be it. Kids have been forbid to say anything about God at school. They should have that right, with out it being used against them.
( grades, suspension, etc)
The bill does not allow religion to be taught in school it allows the students to express their religious beliefs.
Why should a student that practices a religious belief be decimated against ?
It appears those complaining about this bill thinks people should be allowed to live their lives any way they want to as long as they NEVER mention GOD to anyone. That stance is very hypocritical, imo.
God forbid if there should be religious clubs formed at a school. Guess what, membership would be a choice, little Johnny would not be forced to attend or join said club.
"Please write an essay on evolution."
"Jesus did it."
"A+"
please present your paper to the class
"Today I am going to read the book of Genesis to you..."
Hahaha
If the bill was wrote for Muslims, all you crybabies would be all for it. Let it be a Christian, and you throw a fit.
Or if the bill was wrote for gays....
I'm going to assume the ones complaining on this don't go to UT football games. The prayer before the game must really set you on fire that such a act takes place at a university.
Some of y'all need to practice what preach.
All of you.
Hence my previous post.
Why the outrage over this bill PJ? What's wrong with kids being Christians and not being scared to say as much. Apparently you don't keep up with all the kids in the news for expressing their beliefs in God
maybe because creationism is a pretty narrow path. What evidence will be presented that wouldn't be considered religious?
You have a very vulgar understanding of this bill. It's not about kids being able to express themselves as religious. Heck, they're already able to do that. It's enabling them to turn classtime into a sermon/church. And that's uncalled for.
I read it. It doesn't say that. Says that it can be used in school work.
When I went to school, we pledged alligence to flag every morning and had a moment of silence. Schools have changed that already.
What's ironic to me is, the only ones complaining about this are atheist. And yet it protects them as well.
They're already allowed to form religious clubs/Bible studies/etc. in public schools. That's on their own time; that's extracurricular. This bill has nothing to do with clubs. This bill would allow students to usurp a classroom and/or school event (assembly, graduation, sporting event, etc.) and turn it into a religious revival with impunity. I don't have a problem with a student expressing how their religion informs their perspective on a particular topic or even a writing assignment, provided it's relevant. This bill seems to allow willy-nilly as well as turn the classroom into a religious camp. And we would be naive if we didn't know what particular religion this bill benefits.[B/]
