Same sex marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Michigan

#176
#176
Gannon Goodson said:
:eek:lol: :eek:lol:

The intellectual immaturity here is astounding. It's no wonder why America is failing. Incredible... absolutely incredible.
Click to expand...

What? If anything, you are the intellectually immature one (if we are going to resort to this, thanks for taking it there). The fact that you think research can be unbiased shows your intellectual prowess.
 
#178
#178
n_huffhines said:
I guess I'll have to take your word for it.

What about my data? Reported by Fox News, even.
Click to expand...

But there isn't any solid evidence that homosexual parenting is any worse or better than its conventional counterpart, according to Gartrell [the author of the study], who is in a same-sex partnership.
Click to expand...

You gullible morons will believe anything, even from Fox News. :birgits_giggle: :birgits_giggle: :eek:lol: :eek:lol:

My study happens to contain the largest sample ever done on the family, including single-parent families. And it flat out rejects the idea that any family structure other than mommy and daddy is equal.

You're just not going to win this argument with me because I didn't arrive at these conclusions overnight. And my mind hasn't been polluted by our low-rent, s*** culture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#179
#179
govols/cc said:
Yea equality under the law seems to discriminate itself. Gays can just deal with it......they'll lose more sleep over it than people who don't agree with it.
Click to expand...

Wtf are you are even saying? Because it doesn't personal effect you, you don't care? Then why not let them marry?
 
#180
#180
n_huffhines said:
What? If anything, you are the intellectually immature one (if we are going to resort to this, thanks for taking it there). The fact that you think research can be unbiased shows your intellectual prowess.
Click to expand...

Please stop proving me right. Please!

The author is a Ph.D. and an academic. His research is peer-reviewed. That means everyone in his field will see it, read it, and critique it. He cannot be biased, because he'll be guilty of academic fraud. In other words, his career and livelihood is over. In fact, he was attacked and people called for his firing. He was put through the ringer and forced to turn over all his findings to his Department head. Guess what, he's still employed.

Next...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#185
#185
005 said:
NO academics are biased. None at all.
Click to expand...

Most of them are; that's why they're called the "academic left." America's "universities" are full of these clowns. Which, by the way, makes the author's findings even more surprising. He goes against the grain and presents an honest assessment of the illogical stupidity of gay marriage/parenting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#187
#187
Vol8188 said:
What is it then?
Click to expand...

What is what? Damn what are you asking? I'll try to answer. I don't support any liberal bs. I don't believe standards should be lowered in any aspect of life to some in order to make things "fair". I don't believe in lifelong welfare of any kind. Marriage is between a man & woman. Has been for thousands of years. If gays wanna get hitched for supposed benefits then you may as well just do it for every person & throw any marital benefits out the window.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#189
#189
Gannon Goodson said:
You gullible morons will believe anything, even from Fox News. :birgits_giggle: :birgits_giggle: :eek:lol: :eek:lol:

My study happens to contain the largest sample ever done on the family, including single-parent families. And it flat out rejects the idea that any family structure other than mommy and daddy is equal.

You're just not going to win this argument with me because I didn't arrive at these conclusions overnight. And my mind hasn't been polluted by our low-rent, s*** culture.
Click to expand...

Yes, please shed more of that intellectual maturity on us.

I changed my mind on gay marriage, obviously because it was polluted. I'm not close-minded enough to say "you won't win this argument with me", but I guess that's cause I'm so intellectually immature.

Honestly, for someone who talks about "being around long enough..." you should know by now that the law isn't the way to go about creating your ideal world. But good luck with that.
 
#190
#190
govols/cc said:
What is what? Damn what are you asking? I'll try to answer. I don't support any liberal bs. I don't believe standards should be lowered in any aspect of life to some in order to make things "fair". I don't believe in lifelong welfare of any kind. Marriage is between a man & woman. Has been for thousands of years. If gays wanna get hitched for supposed benefits then you may as well just do it for every person & throw any marital benefits out the window.
Click to expand...

See how easy it is to think rationally.
 
#191
#191
Gannon Goodson said:
Most of them are; that's why they're called the "academic left." America's "universities" are full of these clowns. Which, by the way, makes the author's findings even more surprising. He goes against the grain and presents an honest assessment of the illogical stupidity of gay marriage/parenting.
Click to expand...

All of them are because everyone has biases. No matter how open-minded someone is, they still have bias.
 
#192
#192
n_huffhines said:
Yes, please shed more of that intellectual maturity on us.

I changed my mind on gay marriage, obviously because it was polluted. I'm not close-minded enough to say "you won't win this argument with me", but I guess that's cause I'm so intellectually immature.

Honestly, for someone who talks about "being around long enough..." you should know by now that the law isn't the way to go about creating your ideal world. But good luck with that.
Click to expand...

Wait, what the hell are you trying to say? I'm on record many times opposing government involvement in marriage and the benefit system that comes along with it.
 
#196
#196
Gannon Goodson said:
Simple question: Are people who oppose polygamy bigoted against heterosexuals?
Click to expand...

1. I don't oppose polygamy because it violated the first amendment to do so.

2. They are most likely bigoted against this lifestyle. Not heterosexuality in general, but polygamy.
 
#197
#197
govols/cc said:
What is what? Damn what are you asking? I'll try to answer. I don't support any liberal bs. I don't believe standards should be lowered in any aspect of life to some in order to make things "fair". I don't believe in lifelong welfare of any kind. Marriage is between a man & woman. Has been for thousands of years. If gays wanna get hitched for supposed benefits then you may as well just do it for every person & throw any marital benefits out the window.
Click to expand...

How is this related to welfare? And I'm not opposed to throwing all marital benefits out.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top