MyBloodRunnethOrange
Jesus is Lord
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2004
- Messages
- 116,833
- Likes
- 24,376
Imo, we already know what Jennings, Callaway and Johnson can do. So the best news out of fall camp, once again imo, is the progress of Jordan Murphy and potential of Cedric Tillman. I'm thinking UT will be fine at WR. My biggest worry is whether or not the QB or QBs can make the right reads and throws, on time and in the right spots.
I don’t think it’s for him to play TE...he’s not the size they want there. More to pick up the blocking and receiving aspects for use at FB. They’re doing the same with Pope and Blakeley. I keep thinking they have some unique use for Fant in mind...kind of a multiplayer role. JMO
Don't know why it's interesting? That basically means Jeremy Banks is a viable running back. Also, Fant can run, catch, and block. Only makes sense for him to push over to TE. Especially if they motion him from the TB position to the TE position. Which is a very possible thing.Interesting that they're trying Fant at TE again.
Interesting in that it peaked my interestDon't know why it's interesting? That basically means Jeremy Banks is a viable running back. Also, Fant can run, catch, and block. Only makes sense for him to push over to TE. Especially if they motion him from the TB position to the TE position. Which is a very possible thing.
Ahh makes sense. Well I think we might set up in a 2 back offset or I formation and then he might get motioned to TE sometimes.Interesting in that it peaked my interest
I'm sure those that know football are right for showing concern over drops but, (say if) a 100 passes were thrown from 4-5 different QB's and there were less than 10 drops, that <10% doesn't seem alarming. Should it? Maybe if one receiver could be attributed to half of those and the number seems even less significant.Definitely sucks to hear we are still seeing all the drops. I guess I don't fully understand the injury that JJ had. Seems like its taken forever to get over.
I'm sure those that know football are right for showing concern over drops but, (say if) a 100 passes were thrown from 4-5 different QB's and there were less than 10 drops, that <10% doesn't seem alarming. Should it? Maybe if one receiver could be attributed to half of those and the number seems even less significant.
Drops happen in routes on air. It's basically a warm-up session for the rest of practice. How about relax?
Don’t disagree with your larger point, the teams have been feckless for the better part of a decade now. However, we’re specifically discussing WRs, and even if our QB and OL play is/was bad, we could’ve still had outstanding WR play, outstanding individual WRs, and we’ve had neither with anything that remotely resembles consistent excellence. Jennings has briefly flashed, so did Josh Malone, as did Callaway last year on the way to all of 24 catches for the year. So no, no WR for at least the last decade has come close to living up to “Wide Receiver U” standards.Well, to be fair. We could have had Rice, Moss, TO, and Irvin last season and still went 5-7. For much of this Decade of Despair our OLs and QBs have been atrocious. I think we'll have a really good group of WR starters and depth this year. Now the rest of the O, who knows.