- Joined
- Jul 12, 2012
- Messages
- 37,687
- Likes
- 15,640
From what I could read before it wanted my money to read the rest of it, 800 acres ain’t farming. He’s doing it for a hobby.
And his complaint about only getting a price the locals will pay him for his crop, sounds like he needs to go back to ag school.
Help me with this guys, because I have not been formally educated on economics. I have read some Keynes and others BS about supply side and demand side etc...but dont have a deep understanding...
It seems that when it comes to manufacturing and several other issues what hurts us is not being able to compete with cheap labor over seas.
Countries like Venezuela and others that arent failed states, have switched currencies and done other things like that nation wide to money matters to fix problems. Why cant our government legislate that, say. Everything be cut in half. Prices of every good or service, every salary or hourly wage, everything...be cut in half. That would, in theory, make our citizens all paid half what they are now, and make us competitive with other countries for jobs...as long as all goods and services were halved also, it should work right? I understand that the values for all houses, cars, land everything would also be halved...but as long as they all were, it would still work right? Is there something here that I dont get? I know it would then make foreign goods twice as expensive...but that's the point...to make our own stuff again...like we did 50 years ago.
What am I getting wrong here?
price and wage controls are an even bigger disaster for the economy than trade protectionism.
the US still makes plenty of stuff, probably more than it did 50 years ago
We manufacture more than we ever have before, but you'll never hear the protectionists mention this fact. Weird, right? But you will hear "We used to build things in this country..." from the people crying 24/7 about fake news.
However as a percentage of gross output we are more of a service industry I believe right? I think even you’ve brought this up huff?
You're correct about labor costs being the dominant factor, which is why this tariff strategy won't suddenly return us to being a manufacturing juggernaut.Help me with this guys, because I have not been formally educated on economics. I have read some Keynes and others BS about supply side and demand side etc...but dont have a deep understanding...
It seems that when it comes to manufacturing and several other issues what hurts us is not being able to compete with cheap labor over seas.
Countries like Venezuela and others that arent failed states, have switched currencies and done other things like that nation wide to money matters to fix problems. Why cant our government legislate that, say. Everything be cut in half. Prices of every good or service, every salary or hourly wage, everything...be cut in half. That would, in theory, make our citizens all paid half what they are now, and make us competitive with other countries for jobs...as long as all goods and services were halved also, it should work right? I understand that the values for all houses, cars, land everything would also be halved...but as long as they all were, it would still work right? Is there something here that I dont get? I know it would then make foreign goods twice as expensive...but that's the point...to make our own stuff again...like we did 50 years ago.
What am I getting wrong here?
You're correct about labor costs being the dominant factor, which is why this tariff strategy won't suddenly return us to being a manufacturing juggernaut.
That said, no way we're slashing wages. There would be a revolution, lol! Of course, if we continue on our same spending path, inflation will drop the value of the US dollar, perhaps significantly. That might bring relative wages down.
Sure, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing*. It's an inevitable result of becoming wealthier. Essentially what's happened is our ability to buy goods and services has increased more rapidly than our ability to produce goods.
*Manufacturing lost due to regulation is a bad thing, but regulation + protectionism = 2 government wrongs =/= a right
I would say it's due to innovation, mostly.
PoTAYtoe poTAHtoe basically. Growth occurred, I’d say the direct general reason was efficiency increases. The efficiency increase I am sure is related to innovation impacts.
Side note. Innovation is one of those cool buzz words that, as a living breathing practicing engineer, I normally roll my eyes when I hear it. It’s just the recent cool label we now throw around to what us engineers have called “doing our damn jobs” for decades.
Good or bad?
----
Trump says US will institute tariffs on steel and aluminum imports next week
Trump says US will institute tariffs on steel and aluminum imports next week
---
Dow drops 550 points after the announcement (associated press).