Should the President be impeached

Should President Donald Trump be impeached?

  • No

    Votes: 49 74.2%
  • Yes because Russian collusion

    Votes: 5 7.6%
  • Yes because Emoluments Clause

    Votes: 5 7.6%
  • Yes because obstruction of justice

    Votes: 7 10.6%
  • Yes because he incited/incites violence

    Votes: 4 6.1%
  • Yes for undermining the 1st Amendment

    Votes: 4 6.1%
  • Yes because other/unspecified (explain in post)

    Votes: 4 6.1%
  • Yes, just because

    Votes: 15 22.7%

  • Total voters
    66
  • Poll closed .
#52
#52
Not at this point. Porn star payoffs does not rise to cause IMO. If He knew and approved the TT meeting then yes. The pretense "dirt on Hillary" has already put Manafort, Kushner, and Jr. in legal jeopardy.
No politician ever paid anyone off for their silence have they?
 
#53
#53
The 13 that voted yes just because represent the climate and utter stupidity of the liberal base. Its really a shame that you guys are so intellectually and emotionally weak.
 
#60
#60
The 13 that voted yes just because represent the climate and utter stupidity of the liberal base. Its really a shame that you guys are so intellectually and emotionally weak.
A good portion of those “yes just because” are not actual votes they’re just troll votes. Several have admitted so.
 
#61
#61
A good portion of those “yes just because” are not actual votes they’re just troll votes. Several have admitted so.

At times I'm of the opinion that Luther is the only person who really believes Trump has done impeachment worthy things. I think there's a handful that don't really believe the deeds are impeachable but don't care why he gets booted so long as he's booted. Then there's Septic who just values chaos and trolling Trumpers :)
 
#62
#62
At times I'm of the opinion that Luther is the only person who really believes Trump has done impeachment worthy things. I think there's a handful that don't really believe the deeds are impeachable but don't care why he gets booted so long as he's booted. Then there's Septic who just values chaos and trolling Trumpers :)
Don’t see LG short on that one man!

And septic enjoys trolling everybody. Right now red hats are just his prey of choice. 😂
 
#64
#64
If he's complicit with the crimes of Russia, then yes, but I'm not convinced Mueller is investigating that anymore. I thought that was the mandate of the investigation, but it seems he's more interested in digging into Trump's past than he is trying to prove "collusion". He's turned the investigation into a farce, IMO.
 
#65
#65
If he's complicit with the crimes of Russia, then yes, but I'm not convinced Mueller is investigating that anymore. I thought that was the mandate of the investigation, but it seems he's more interested in digging into Trump's past than he is trying to prove "collusion". He's turned the investigation into a farce, IMO.
His mandate from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General authorizing his appointment:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald J Trump and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 CFR § 600.4 (a)

28 CFR § 600.4 Jurisdiction.
(a) Original jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall be established by the Attorney General. The Special Counsel will be provided with a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall also include the authority to investigate and prosecute federal crimes committed in the course of, and with intent to interfere with, the Special Counsel's investigation, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses; and to conduct appeals arising out of the matter being investigated and/or prosecuted.

Pay special attention to (ii) and the bolded.

Now, show me on the doll where Robert Mueller has upset you by working outside the boundaries of his mandate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#66
#66
Too early to say. Need more info.

Right now all you can say is that he's an atrocious person and should not be re elected under any circumstances.

But thrown out is a different matter and that is not yet demonstrated to be justified.
 
#72
#72
Depends on what law IMO. Campaign finance law? No impeachment.
That's why i said endangered the country. Paying off a porn star isn't endangering the country. Just shows what a despicable pervert he is. The man is unfit to be president, yet I'm impressed by both his SC nominees and a lot of the regulation roll back and other efforts. Shows us how incompetent past leadership has been.
 
#73
#73
That's why i said endangered the country. Paying off a porn star isn't endangering the country. Just shows what a despicable pervert he is. The man is unfit to be president, yet I'm impressed by both his SC nominees and a lot of the regulation roll back and other efforts. Shows us how incompetent past leadership has been.

Im curious as to how , in your opinion , has he endangered the country .
 

VN Store



Back
Top