Report: Obama White House Tried to Intrude on FBI's Russia Investigation

#1

BigOrangeD

Got Bitcoin?
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
25,829
Likes
19,979
#1
Report: Obama White House Tried to Intrude on FBI's Russia Investigation

Report: Obama White House Tried to Intrude on FBI's Russia Investigation

The Obama administration tried to take over the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign, The Hill's John Solomon reported on Fox News Thursday night. And according to Solomon, the FBI began spying on members of the Trump campaign to gather the intelligence that ultimately justified the collusion investigation, weeks or even months before the FBI had a formal predicate.

"That's very important. The rules say you can't use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The predication is July 31, 2016," Solomon told Fox host Sean Hannity.

Full Article from John Solomon should be released sometime today at The Hill.
 
#2
#2
67myc.jpg
 
#3
#3
Fake news. If you do not have anonymous unnamed sources close to the campaign/investigation/White House and on a news channel not named FoxNews..its fake..
 
  • Like
Reactions: txbo and FLVOL69
#4
#4
London ‘bridges’ falling down: Curious origins of FBI’s Trump-Russia probe


http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/390228-london-bridges-falling-down-curious-origins-of-fbis-trump-russia-probe

The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn’t erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election.

It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 some from trusted intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.

The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?

Here’s what a congressman and an intelligence expert think.

The revelation of purposeful contact initiated by alleged confidential human sources prior to any FBI investigation is troublesome, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), an ally of President Trump and chairman of a House subcommittee that’s taking an increasingly aggressive oversight role in the scandal, told me. This new information begs the questions: Who were the informants working for, who were they reporting to and why has the [Department of Justice] and FBI gone to such great lengths to hide these contacts?

...

They voiced alarm when an FBI colleague Liz suggested the Obama White House was about to hijack the investigation. Went well, best we could have expected,Strzok texted Page after an Aug. 5, 2016, meeting. Other than Liz quote ‘the White House is running this.’ Page then texted to assure Strzok of a paper trail showing the FBI in charge: We got emails that say otherwise.

...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7
#7
Last edited:
#8
#8
#9
#9
#10
#10
On tap for tomorrow in Mueller's investigation:
Mueller Brings Heightened Scrutiny to Roger Stone, Longtime Trump Adviser
Among developments, ‘Manhattan Madam’ Kristin Davis testifies before grand jury hearing evidence in the Russia election-interference probe


im-21733

Roger Stone is of interest to Special Counsel Robert Mueller largely because of his interactions with WikiLeaks and the online persona Guccifer 2.0. PHOTO: SETH WENIG/ASSOCIATED PRESS
341 COMMENTS
By
Sadie Gurman and
Shelby Holliday
Updated Aug. 10, 2018 5:10 p.m. ET

Special counsel Robert Mueller is bringing heightened scrutiny to Roger Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump who claimed he had interactions with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange during the 2016 presidential campaign.
On Thursday, Mr. Mueller subpoenaed the man Mr. Stone claims was his back channel to WikiLeaks throughout the campaign—New York comedian and radio personality Randy Credico. The subpoena was confirmed by Mr. Credico’s attorney, Martin Stolar.

im-21699

Randy Credico, in 2013. PHOTO: JOHN MINCHILLO/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Separately, self-described “Manhattan Madam” Kristin Davis, who has close ties with Mr. Stone, testified Friday before the grand jury hearing evidence in Mr. Mueller’s Russia investigation, her spokeswoman said.
The probe is looking at alleged Russian interference in the campaign and any possible coordination with Trump associates. The investigation has resulted in charges against four former campaign officials and more than two dozen Russians. Russia has denied meddling in the election.
Mr. Mueller’s interest in Mr. Stone stems largely from his interactions with WikiLeaks and the online persona Guccifer 2.0. In an indictment last month, the special counsel’s office alleged Guccifer 2.0 was a front for Russian intelligence officials who hacked material later released by WikiLeaks.
The Wall Street Journal has reviewed emails showing Mr. Stone told Mr. Credico in September to “please ask Assange” for information that would be damaging to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. In October, weeks before the 2016 election, WikiLeaks began releasing the emails of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta.
Mr. Credico has denied being a conduit between WikiLeaks and Mr. Stone. He says he didn’t have a relationship with Mr. Assange until the WikiLeaks founder agreed to do his radio program on Aug. 25, weeks after Mr. Stone claimed to be in touch with him.Mr. Stone has said WikiLeaks never gave him any information and that he never had special access to the website’s material.
Mr. Stone said Friday that while Mr. Credico told him in the summer of 2016 that WikiLeaks planned to release “substantial information on Hillary Clinton” that October, Mr. Credico didn’t tell him “what the source, content or scope of the WikiLeaks disclosures would be.”
Mr. Credico and his lawyer believe he will be asked about his relationships with Messrs. Stone and Assange. Mr. Credico told the Journal on Thursday he was a “nervous wreck,” but he indicated that he plans to appear before the grand jury.
Mr. Stone was a campaign adviser to Ms. Davis when she ran for governor of New York in 2010. She first came into prominence in 2008 after it was revealed that then-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer patronized an escort service. She claimed she provided prostitutes for him, though Mr. Spitzer denied using Ms. Davis’s service.
Mr. Stone on Friday described Ms. Davis as a friend and “brilliant business woman who paid her debt to society and remade her life.” She wasn’t working for him when he was part of Mr. Trump’s campaign, he said. His attorneys urged him not to discuss her testimony with her.
“She has no knowledge of Russian Collusion, WikiLeaks collaboration or any other illegal activity on my part,” Mr. Stone told The Wall Street Journal.
Related Video



play-overlay.png

Will Mueller Finish His Investigation Before or After the Midterms?
080318seib_16x9still.jpg


Special counsel Robert Mueller is pushing forward in the Russia probe, but some fear the investigation will influence the midterms. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains why. Photo: Getty
Ms. Davis’s spokeswoman, Lainie Speiser, declined to elaborate beyond confirming her testimony.
Also Friday, an aide to Mr. Stone, Andrew Miller, was held in contempt of court for refusing to testify before the grand jury. A judge had rejected Mr. Miller’s argument that Mr. Mueller’s appointment was unconstitutional and ordered him to answer questions. His lawyer, Paul Kamenar, said he asked to be held in contempt to appeal the judge’s ruling.
Mr. Miller has been otherwise cooperative, Mr. Kamenar said.
“He’s turned over documents, he’s talked to the FBI, but he still thinks it’s important that we raise this issue. Therefore he refused to testify,” he said.
The subpoena to Mr. Credico requests his testimony before a grand jury on Sept. 7. The timing suggests the Mueller probe is still at least weeks away from wrapping up, and could go beyond the November midterm elections.
 
Last edited:
#11
#11
Keep that name in your back pocket for a while. Could be someone of interest later on...

What are you referring to? Are you implying this COI could be grounds for firing Mueller?

That's an interesting thought to say the least.
 
#12
#12
#13
#13
Mueller interviewing Credico today. Visited Assange three times in the past year. Cresico has relationship with Roger Stone. Deripaska’s attorney/lobbyist has met with Assange nine times in the past year. One article stated the Clinton campaign had far more contact and dealings with Deripaska. So, what all does Assange know? No wonder we want to extradite him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#15
#15
#18
#18
Are you seriously asking? I can't tell.

If yes, he's a Russian oligarch who is currently sanctioned by US government under the Magnitsky act.

He is a central figure of the Spygate scandal - has ties to Hillary Clinton.

Mueller may have a conflict — and it leads directly to a Russian oligarch

What do you make of this? Allegedly, he was approached by Bruce Ohr and Christopher Steele to get some info on a possible Russia/Trump connection, but didn't flip.

Seems like this guy is up to his eyeballs in this, just not sure what side he is on after this.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.
 
Last edited:
#19
#19
What do you make of this? Allegedly, he was approached by Bruce Ohr and Christopher Steele to get some info on a possible Russia.Trump connection, but didn't flip.

Seems like this guy is up to his eyeballs in this, just not sure what side he is on after this.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.

He's on his own side and Putin's side of course.

I don't trust him at all. Seems like sowing discord is one of the main objectives. That along with relief from sanctions.

I think he thought Hillary was going to win. He was positioning himself based on HRC in the White House. I think he certainly has information that could damage many on the left and many others entrenched in the deep state.

There are questions about whether or not Christopher Steele was on his payroll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#20
#20
He's on his own side and Putin's side of course.

I don't trust him at all. Seems like sowing discord is one of the main objectives. That along with relief from sanctions.

I think he thought Hillary was going to win. He was positioning himself based on HRC in the White House. I think he certainly has information that could damage many on the left and many others entrenched in the deep state.

There are questions about whether or not Christopher Steele was on his payroll.

Agree. Bongino mentioned something similar a few podcast ago. He said Deripaska was aiding Clinton until she lost and now is trying to get into the good graces of Trump. Good luck with that.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#22
#22
Now, put yourself in Deripaska’s shoes and think about what happens AFTER candidate Donald Trump surprisingly wins the election.

All of a sudden Deripaska the asset becomes a risk to the corrupt Scheme Team (DOJ/FBI et al); especially as the DOJ/FBI then execute the “insurance policy” effort against Donald Trump…. and eventually enlist Robert Mueller.

It is entirely possible for a Russian to be blackmailing someone, but it ain’t Trump vulnerable to blackmail; it’s the conspiracy crew within the DOJ and FBI. Deripaska now has blackmail material on Comey, McCabe and crew.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01

VN Store



Back
Top