Iran nuclear program. It is a lie

#2
#2
  • Like
Reactions: 14 people
#6
#6
Didn’t Netyanahu concede his own evidence showed Iran stopped its program years ago? Why is it revelatory to prove lies we already knew were lies?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#7
#7
roosterjbh said:
Didn’t Netyanahu concede his own evidence showed Iran stopped its program years ago? Why is it revelatory to prove lies we already knew were lies?
Click to expand...


You are correct.

The materials Netanyahu was talking about are from the Iranian archives, and detailed efforts to obtain weapons prior to the agreement.

There was a lot of confusion as Trump and other persons as uninformed and as abjectly stupid as he is went around saying these materials were about ongoing or current efforts to obtain weapons. Which they are not.

This, for example, caused an embarrassing snafu for the White House when Sanders said that the documents showed that Iran "has" such a program when in fact they do not prove that, and relate to what Iran at one time had. Before the agreement.

You can read about the difference and how the WH had to then quickly change their statement to clarify that it was past tense:

White House claims 'clerical error' led to drastic change in Iran statement - CNNPolitics

This is the kind of thing that ought to concern people. Once again, Trump hears something on Fox or gets snookered by someone like Netanyahu, and makes all sorts of dumbass statements that have to then be walked back.

Tillerson and Kelly are right. Trump has no clue about policy and is an f'ing moron and an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Main, SuperDave, k-town_king and 9 others
#8
#8
lawgator1 said:
You are correct.

The materials Netanyahu was talking about are from the Iranian archives, and detailed efforts to obtain weapons prior to the agreement.

There was a lot of confusion as Trump and other persons as uninformed and as abjectly stupid as he is went around saying these materials were about ongoing or current efforts to obtain weapons. Which they are not.

This, for example, caused an embarrassing snafu for the White House when Sanders said that the documents showed that Iran "has" such a program when in fact they do not prove that, and relate to what Iran at one time had. Before the agreement.

You can read about the difference and how the WH had to then quickly change their statement to clarify that it was past tense:

White House claims 'clerical error' led to drastic change in Iran statement - CNNPolitics

This is the kind of thing that ought to concern people. Once again, Trump hears something on Fox or gets snookered by someone like Netanyahu, and makes all sorts of dumbass statements that have to then be walked back.

Tillerson and Kelly are right. Trump has no clue about policy and is an f'ing moron and an idiot.
Click to expand...


I'm sure you could do better.

Trump should get a Nobel Peace Prize, says South Korean president - MarketWatch
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9
#9
Isn’t Netanyahu also up on big time corruption charges? I feel like that should be a bigger deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#13
#13
hog88 said:
Did we at least deduct the cost of the embassy and the hostages pain/suffering?
Click to expand...

Those weren't actions by the Iranian government.

You're playing a dangerous game here. How much $ would the US owe if we had to pay countries for damages?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#14
#14
Netanyahu and his son are embroiled in more scandals than Donnie Dotard and his family, as if that's possible, including bribery and breach of trust. Of course Trump is going to believe him. Prepare to fight more Israeli wars. My nephew couldn't pick a worse time to be deployed to Kuwait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16
#16
roosterjbh said:
Isn’t Netanyahu also up on big time corruption charges? I feel like that should be a bigger deal.
Click to expand...

My first reaction to his presentation yesterday is that he's saying this now to deflect from that.

Netanyahu's corruption in Israel is something of an open secret. Rumors and speculation have dogged him for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#17
#17
n_huffhines said:
Those weren't actions by the Iranian government.

You're playing a dangerous game here. How much $ would the US owe if we had to pay countries for damages?
Click to expand...

It most certainly was an action supported by the Iranian govt.

Shoot? How much have we paid out in damages, billions?
 
#20
#20
It will be funny when Iran decides to renegotiate this deal. We would be foolish to sign any deal that does not include 365 day inspection, no warning, and never allowing them to have nuclear weapons.
 
#22
#22
n_huffhines said:
You're better than that. This is Squints-level bull**** right here.
Click to expand...

I don’t have time to look it up.

If the Supreme Ayatollah would have ordered the terrorist out of the embassy and the release of the hostages it would have been over in hours. But he waited 444 days to give that order.
 
#25
#25
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top