Ohio Vol
Inquisitor of Offense
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,057
- Likes
- 128
That's all I'll say.
I remember at two points looking at my lovely wife and asking, "How on earth is a fullback getting a good block while a DT simply walks away from a guard like he's not even there to make the play?"
These are the facts.
1) There is absolutely no actual push on the part of the OL, just a lot of stalemates
2) As a result, the defense has the upper hand. By failing to actually move the feet, the OL is ensuring that no ballcarrier can possibly get past the linebackers. The DLs are simply walking away from blocks and making plays between the first and second level
3) There is no initial pop; it's more like a catch. That also puts the DL in prime position
The real key to General Neyland's maxims is "One good blocker is worth three good ballcarriers". There has never been a championship team in the history of college (or pro) football that has not had an above-average offensive line. Detroit with Matt Millen and Cleveland immediately after expansion proved that you can snap up all the RBs, receivers, and quarterbacks you want, but if the line isn't there, the team goes nowhere.
For there to be UT's offensive line letting defenders walk off of blocks is ridiculous. That's a case of no technique being taught, and as good of a lineman as someone may be, they desperately need to be schooled in fundamentals. Most have no trouble dominating in high school due to the size and strength difference, which simply doesn't happen at the college level.
So for what it's worth, I'm throwing Greg Adkins on the chopping block and throwing my hat in the ring to take over.
I remember at two points looking at my lovely wife and asking, "How on earth is a fullback getting a good block while a DT simply walks away from a guard like he's not even there to make the play?"
These are the facts.
1) There is absolutely no actual push on the part of the OL, just a lot of stalemates
2) As a result, the defense has the upper hand. By failing to actually move the feet, the OL is ensuring that no ballcarrier can possibly get past the linebackers. The DLs are simply walking away from blocks and making plays between the first and second level
3) There is no initial pop; it's more like a catch. That also puts the DL in prime position
The real key to General Neyland's maxims is "One good blocker is worth three good ballcarriers". There has never been a championship team in the history of college (or pro) football that has not had an above-average offensive line. Detroit with Matt Millen and Cleveland immediately after expansion proved that you can snap up all the RBs, receivers, and quarterbacks you want, but if the line isn't there, the team goes nowhere.
For there to be UT's offensive line letting defenders walk off of blocks is ridiculous. That's a case of no technique being taught, and as good of a lineman as someone may be, they desperately need to be schooled in fundamentals. Most have no trouble dominating in high school due to the size and strength difference, which simply doesn't happen at the college level.
So for what it's worth, I'm throwing Greg Adkins on the chopping block and throwing my hat in the ring to take over.