 | | 
12-15-2007, 12:43 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Res Ipsa Loquitur
| Pryor Is Out
Per Scout today Terrell Pryor said he was no longer interested in Tennessee with Cut out. | 
|   | |
12-15-2007, 12:44 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Valid Victorian
| Not a big deal, though over 100 people on this board will contemplate suicide. | 
| | |
12-15-2007, 12:44 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Bleating Minion
| Quote:
Originally Posted by VolinArizona  Not a big deal, though over 100 people on this board will contemplate suicide. |  I was just thinking the same thing. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 12:48 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | VN GURU
| No Cut, no Pryor? No problem.
__________________
| |
| | |
12-15-2007, 12:49 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Abides.
Join Date: Jan 2007  Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 7,267
Likes: 0
| We'll need a new "QB depth chart for next year" thread. Many folks had this kid as the starter. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 12:51 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Straight cash, homey...
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: In the briar patch
Posts: 20,609
Likes: 637
| I'ld rather not have Cutcliffe than have Pryor. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 12:52 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | VN's One and Only
| i don't understand why some people get so upset about this. even if cut had stayed, i still felt that our chances of landing the guy were slim.
__________________ 
Last edited by duckman398686; 12-15-2007 at 12:55 PM..
| |
| | |
12-15-2007, 12:59 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | VN GURU
| Quote:
Originally Posted by VolinArizona Not a big deal, though over 100 people on this board will contemplate suicide. | He is the top prospect in the entire class of 08.
Although Compton was a #2 prospect at QB, it would have been nice to have landed him. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:00 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
| Pryor is a spread option qb so Cut wouldn't have used him well anyway | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | VN GURU
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudeepvol Pryor is a spread option qb so Cut wouldn't have used him well anyway | he's definitely a good running QB. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:03 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
| who cares? We have Crompton and Coleman, both who are better | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:04 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | VN GURU
| He is the kind of QB that could do well in any system.
Are you trying to say that Cut doesn't play to his QBs strengths?
Crompton was #3, not #2. Sanchez and Perriloux were ahead of him. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:04 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | VN GURU
| Neither are better. Both are good prospects. Pryor is on another level. | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:06 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
| Pryor really isn't that great. This year he will just be another mediocre freshman | |
| | |
12-15-2007, 01:07 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hvwarrior58 He is the kind of QB that could do well in any system.
Are you trying to say that Cut doesn't play to his QBs strengths?
Crompton was #3, not #2. Sanchez and Perriloux were ahead of him. | I'm saying Cut's system is obviously more traditional than most...Pryor would reach his greatest potential by being in a spread option system...I think Cut would have used him well, just not to his potential. | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | | |
 | |
Forums |
