 | | 
10-03-2008, 02:52 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Gr8 2 B A TENNESSEE VOL
Join Date: Sep 2004  Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 1,496
| Will increase in Tickets prices/students paying for tickets be Fulmer's worse enemy?
I dont think I have seen anyone mention this point. I have seen a whole lot more negativity this year with the recent blunders. I think that perhaps the new ticket prices and charging students this year can be a big reason why fans/students are so negative with the booing and everything else. I thought things were bad within the public in 05' but this year by far takes the cake... your thoughts? | 
|   | |
10-03-2008, 02:54 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | How high is the Cliff?
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 27,650
| Higher ticket prices combined with lower quality football is not a good mix. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 02:59 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Gone Fishin'
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,525
| Why not have an imaginary game. Charge everyone 57 bucks a ticket (based on 105,000 people) to pay for Fulmer's 6 million dollar buy-out. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 03:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Lurking....
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Tampa
Posts: 8,029
| Student's (parents) paying for tiks has nothing to do with CPF.
__________________ Everyone's perception of reality is different. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 03:19 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | It's TIME!!
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,842
| I don't think higher ticket prices has anything to do with it either. It's what's happening on the field. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 03:21 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Gr8 2 B A TENNESSEE VOL
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 1,496
| Quote:
Originally Posted by volmanbill  Student's (parents) paying for tiks has nothing to do with CPF. | It has nothing to do with him directly... however true or not, many students i run into claim that "ticket prices were raised so Fulmer could have a raise". I have heard that with 90% of the people I've talked to. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 03:45 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,366
| If they pay fulmer and his coaches $10 million in buyout money, look for another big increase in ticket prices for funding. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 05:16 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 30
| The only problem Fulmer has, and has ever had, is his performance on gameday. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 06:32 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | CromptOWNED.
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 7,515
| Quote:
Originally Posted by volmanbill Student's (parents) paying for tiks has nothing to do with CPF. | Many students have bought their own tickets. And I think it is a factor judging by the comments in the student section. Have you spoken to students about it? | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 06:43 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Lurking....
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Tampa
Posts: 8,029
| If students are having trouble paying for tiks, I doubt they are spending a substantial amount inside.
Point is, it was the University that instituted the changes. I seriously doubt they asked CPF for his input.
__________________ Everyone's perception of reality is different. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 07:13 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,366
| If UT needs a lot of cash for the buyout, can they raise tuition to pay for it? Maybe $100 per student? | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 07:42 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Knoxville
Posts: 161
| Quote:
Originally Posted by volmanbill If students are having trouble paying for tiks, I doubt they are spending a substantial amount inside.
Point is, it was the University that instituted the changes. I seriously doubt they asked CPF for his input. | Please don't mistake the "University" for the Athletic Department... they operate as separate entities. It was an athletic department decision. | |
| | |
10-03-2008, 07:44 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | hoping for a turnaround
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Johnson City
Posts: 13,632
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CMO Please don't mistake the "University" for the Athletic Department... they operate as separate entities. It was an athletic department decision. | that an overwhelming majority of AD's are currently doing. UT was one of the few still letting students in free. | 
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM. | |  |
Forums |
