 | | 
04-26-2007, 09:08 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
| | VN Guru
Join Date: Dec 2005  Location: Memphis
Posts: 19,877
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hvwarrior58  We also have quite a few players with an extra year of experience as well, moot point. You also didn't get to see our most explosive offensive player last year other than after the fact drives(Coker). Our defense will be a ton faster this year. | Meachem was on the field. | 
|   | |
04-26-2007, 10:15 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 465
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenn_Vol_Authority I bet you he doesn't see the field for any significant time. I've seen Fulmer do it too many times before to realize the truth. |  | 
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:19 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
| | Abides.
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 6,751
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski hughes wasn't the one who got beat, that was the freshman thompson. And I bet hughes gets drafted higher than wade or any other tenn CB this sat. | I'll put a grand on that. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:27 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dude I'll put a grand on that. | and if I thought there was any prayer of you actually paying me i'd take you up on that. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:28 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
| | VN Guru
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Memphis
Posts: 19,877
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski and if I thought there was any prayer of you actually paying me i'd take you up on that. | Nice post. I actually agree and don't have anything insulting to add. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:29 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,093
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski and if I thought there was any prayer of you actually paying me i'd take you up on that. | Hughes probably dropped down to a 3rd or 4th round pick with that 40 time he posted and Wade was mentioned on Sportscenter as an underrated player. Hughes was mentioned as an overrated player. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:33 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
| | Abides.
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 6,751
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski and if I thought there was any prayer of you actually paying me i'd take you up on that. | It doesn't matter if I have it or not, Wade will be picked before Hughes. Hughes runs a 4.7. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:33 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
| | Valid Victorian
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,389
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossepro70 Hughes probably dropped down to a 3rd or 4th round pick with that 40 time he posted and Wade was mentioned on Sportscenter as an underrated player. Hughes was mentioned as an overrated player. | Because ESPN is the bastion of truth 
Wade is a track guy that just happens to play a little bit of football. Hughes was All-Conference for a couple of years.
If a team that runs a Cover-2 scheme needs a CB, then Hughes will go in front of Wade and have just as good if not better a career than Wade.
Wade is more athletic, but hell, at one point he quit football to run track and only participated in one spring practice. Hughes is a better CB right now. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:33 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,558
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kptvol Nice post. I actually agree and don't have anything insulting to add. | Well with your month away from posting, you'll have plenty of time to think of something to say. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:34 PM
|
#71 (permalink)
| | Abides.
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 6,751
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kptvol Nice post. I actually agree and don't have anything insulting to add. | Insightful knowledge from you would be nice, but that's too much to ask from you. Would you like to put 1000.00 on this? I'll gladly take you or treehugger up on this one. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:35 PM
|
#72 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossepro70 Hughes probably dropped down to a 3rd or 4th round pick with that 40 time he posted and Wade was mentioned on Sportscenter as an underrated player. Hughes was mentioned as an overrated player. | he was still a huge playmaker at cal and ran a 4.5 40 at the cal pro day. he says he had a pulled hammy at the combine but that could be bs. edit: now i remember he actually pulled the hammy at the senior bowl. Before the combine most had him the #1 or #2 corner.
Last edited by droski; 04-26-2007 at 10:38 PM..
| |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:37 PM
|
#73 (permalink)
| | Valid Victorian
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,389
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski he was still a huge playmaker at cal and ran a 4.5 40 at the cal pro day. he says he had a pulled hammy at the combine but that could be bs. Before the combine most had him the #1 or #2 corner. | He was never #1. That was Leon Hall and 2nd was Darrelle Revis. At best he was third | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:37 PM
|
#74 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by justingroves Because ESPN is the bastion of truth
Wade is a track guy that just happens to play a little bit of football. Hughes was All-Conference for a couple of years.
If a team that runs a Cover-2 scheme needs a CB, then Hughes will go in front of Wade and have just as good if not better a career than Wade.
Wade is more athletic, but hell, at one point he quit football to run track and only participated in one spring practice. Hughes is a better CB right now. | exactly there was a reason he won pac-10 defensive player of the year and he looked real good in the senior bowl before he got injured. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 10:37 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by justingroves He was never #1. That was Leon Hall and 2nd was Darrelle Revis. At best he was third | maybe, most had him as a late first rounder. | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM. | |  |
Forums |
