 | | 
04-26-2007, 06:44 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 
Posts: 12,539
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski  hopefully, his hand wont be broken this year. he improved considerably by the end of the year. he was on at least one freshman all american list (sportingnews maybe?). Not to worry though, our other CB with either be a redshirt freshman, converted safety, or converted rover. Does oneal have good size? Those are the type of receivers we have had problems with in the past.
edit: rivals says 6 foot, 195. Doesn't that really mean he is 5'10? | I think it means he's faster then anyone on Cal's team.  | 
|   | |
04-26-2007, 06:48 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
| | Valid Victorian
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,770
| Even if Thompson is good now, we'll go to the other side against an unproven CB.
__________________ Quick reminders: Demetri ce Mor ley, Denarius Moore  | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 06:58 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by VolinArizona Even if Thompson is good now, we'll go to the other side against an unproven CB. | true. i'd hope he'd get help from decoud or hampton who are both very good safeties. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 07:00 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,093
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski | No the rivals video says O'Neal ran a 10.3 exactly, and broke several California high school track records. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 07:01 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossepro70 No the rivals video says O'Neal ran a 10.3 exactly, and broke several California high school track records. | your right it says 10.34 but it doesn't mention if that is outside or inside. Obviously they are both very fast. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 07:24 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,539
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski your right it says 10.34 but it doesn't mention if that is outside or inside. Obviously they are both very fast. | I think everyone saw how fast Cal's CB was last year | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 07:47 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
| | Jump on the Lane Train
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,780
| mayo sure does | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:25 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by oklavol I think everyone saw how fast Cal's CB was last year | i don't think speed was the problem. meachum just destroyed him physically. and the kid tried for the int a couple of times he shouldn't have and he paid for it dearly. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:28 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,093
| No he has no speed too. His 40 time at the combine was like 4.65. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:33 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossepro70 No he has no speed too. His 40 time at the combine was like 4.65. | hughes wasn't the one who got beat, that was the freshman thompson. And I bet hughes gets drafted higher than wade or any other tenn CB this sat. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:34 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,093
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski hughes wasn't the one who got beat, that was the freshman thompson. And I bet hughes gets drafted higher than wade or any other tenn CB this sat. | No Wade will go higher. | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:40 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossepro70 No Wade will go higher. | most "experts" have them both in the late second round.  | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:43 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
| | The Gamecock Slayer
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,924
| Quote:
Originally Posted by droski | Correct me if Im wrong, but even if Desean Jackson is faster than O'Neal, Jackson wont be covering him.... Quote:
Originally Posted by droski true. i'd hope he'd get help from decoud or hampton who are both very good safeties. | As in the ones whose names were called numerous time on mis-tackles and being out of position? Oh yea, thats them... | |
| | |
04-26-2007, 08:46 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
| | Irrelevant since 09/2007
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,488
| Quote:
Originally Posted by smokeyman15 Correct me if Im wrong, but even if Desean Jackson is faster than O'Neal, Jackson wont be covering him....
As in the ones whose names were called numerous time on mis-tackles and being out of position? Oh yea, thats them... | the statement was we didn't have anyone on our team as fast as oneal.
and yes you kicked our butt last year. these guys have a whole year of experience. apparently you guys have never seen improvement from one year to the next in your players. | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM. | |  |
Forums |
