tonybologna
VFL
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2009
- Messages
- 10,685
- Likes
- 3,104
https://bricesviewsfromthetop.wordp...s-in-hoke-urges-tougher-more-physical-d-line/
Excellent read coming from a VFL himself.
Excellent read coming from a VFL himself.
What does it say about S. Jones that despite the fact that he has been here longer than Guarantano? I have not seen anything to make me think he has a legitimate shot at winning starting job out of the gates, but I do not get to watch practice either. Just think it is odd that he nobody thinks he has a chance.
What does it say about S. Jones that despite the fact that he has been here longer than Guarantano he is mentioned as basically 3rd string? I have not seen anything to make me think he has a legitimate shot at winning starting job out of the gates, but I do not get to watch practice either. Just think it is odd that he nobody thinks he has a chance.
What does it say about S. Jones that despite the fact that he has been here longer than Guarantano he is mentioned as basically 3rd string? I have not seen anything to make me think he has a legitimate shot at winning starting job out of the gates, but I do not get to watch practice either. Just think it is odd that he nobody thinks he has a chance.
Good read....oh wait, I just remembered the rule on here. Articles with un-named sources can't be taken seriously.
Plus, I reached out to some NFL folks as well. Once again, the feedback was remarkable.
A person intricately involved in this years NFL Draft, who cannot speak on the record about players still in college, didnt hold back Tennessees enviable situation.:ermm::unsure::thud:
Good read....oh wait, I just remembered the rule on here. Articles with un-named sources can't be taken seriously.
Plus, I reached out to some NFL folks as well. Once again, the feedback was remarkable.
A person intricately involved in this years NFL Draft, who cannot speak on the record about players still in college, didnt hold back Tennessees enviable situation.:ermm::unsure::thud:
Have u seen him throw?
Good read....oh wait, I just remembered the rule on here. Articles with un-named sources can't be taken seriously.
Plus, I reached out to some NFL folks as well. Once again, the feedback was remarkable.
A person intricately involved in this years NFL Draft, who cannot speak on the record about players still in college, didnt hold back Tennessees enviable situation.:ermm::unsure::thud:
these QB situations are tricky--always is when you've got multiple talented QBs. Hell, we all felt sorry for Peterman after that florida game debacle; he transfers to Pitt, has two fine years and may be drafted ahead of Dobbs. We seem to have a pretty talented pro-style passer and a kid who is more in the Dobbs mold--mobile and can throw it. I'm speculating but if Dormady can throw it better than G this spring and fall, we might see him get the early nod, even if G holds more potential as a dual threat, and the coaches see how things unfold. The tricky part is that you can't force a pro-style guy into the read-option/called QB run system that we had with Dobbs. Maybe Dormady runs better than I think--don't know for sure--but we did that with Worley, who couldn't run, and never ran despite running the "read-option"--and it was kind of stupid. So I will be interested to see if the coaches modify the scheme or keep it the same.
these QB situations are tricky--always is when you've got multiple talented QBs. Hell, we all felt sorry for Peterman after that florida game debacle; he transfers to Pitt, has two fine years and may be drafted ahead of Dobbs. We seem to have a pretty talented pro-style passer and a kid who is more in the Dobbs mold--mobile and can throw it. I'm speculating but if Dormady can throw it better than G this spring and fall, we might see him get the early nod, even if G holds more potential as a dual threat, and the coaches see how things unfold. The tricky part is that you can't force a pro-style guy into the read-option/called QB run system that we had with Dobbs. Maybe Dormady runs better than I think--don't know for sure--but we did that with Worley, who couldn't run, and never ran despite running the "read-option"--and it was kind of stupid. So I will be interested to see if the coaches modify the scheme or keep it the same.
And to think what might have been had we used Peterman in a pro or even an I formation instead of having Dobbs run for his life! :good!:
Anybody see what I did there?:unsure:
In keeping with what you say.
One of the "college talkers" in the article really emphasized modifying a system to a qb's abilities. He stated it almost like he was talking straight to Coach Jones. To me it points to Jones's seeming "hard headedness" If things work out as they have before, this does not bode well for Dormady.
I've read all sorts of comments and opinions the last few years about pro style QBs and their run threats. Dobbs was exceptionally gifted as a runner during a broken play and subject to house one at any time. However, even if QD is not gifted as a runner at all, he often only has to go 3 or 4 yards on a passing down to get another set of chains. Worley could or would not even attempt it. QD has nothing in his history to think he cannot do that, I do not have the concerns many do about him in this area.these QB situations are tricky--always is when you've got multiple talented QBs. Hell, we all felt sorry for Peterman after that florida game debacle; he transfers to Pitt, has two fine years and may be drafted ahead of Dobbs. We seem to have a pretty talented pro-style passer and a kid who is more in the Dobbs mold--mobile and can throw it. I'm speculating but if Dormady can throw it better than G this spring and fall, we might see him get the early nod, even if G holds more potential as a dual threat, and the coaches see how things unfold. The tricky part is that you can't force a pro-style guy into the read-option/called QB run system that we had with Dobbs. Maybe Dormady runs better than I think--don't know for sure--but we did that with Worley, who couldn't run, and never ran despite running the "read-option"--and it was kind of stupid. So I will be interested to see if the coaches modify the scheme or keep it the same.