VFL-82-JP
Bleedin' Orange...
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 19,653
- Likes
- 52,096
The question has come up a couple of times in the past few months about whether Butch Jones can call a good game on Saturday, whether he can beat the best of the best opposing coaches. I've mentioned more than once that I think his record at CMU and Cincy, as well as glimmers here at Tennessee so far, have shown that he is just as strong a 'chess' coach as he is on the recruiting trail.
But I never really dug down to find out exactly who he played during those six years as head coach before he got to Knoxville. This morning, I did. Here's what I found:
Granted, Butch hasn't yet beaten Nick Saban or Urban Meyer, Mark Richt or Les Miles. He hasn't yet dominated most of the absolute best of the best college football coaches. But he has beaten one of them: Steve Spurrier. And he's done it twice in a row. The first time with equal or less talent. And he has certainly proven he can win chess matches against the second-highest tier, the Frank Beamers and David Cutcliffes and Tom O'Briens and Greg Schianos and Mark Dantonios.
Yes, Butch still has to prove it on the field, against Saban. Against Richt. And hopefully soon, against Meyer. And I think he's gonna do fine. In fact, I think 2015 is the year where he adds notches to his belt for one or two of those other top-tier coaches. Go Vols!
NOTES:
1. Did you pick up on the amusing irony concerning Charlie Strong? Some in VN wanted Strong instead of Jones as our new head coach, thinking Strong was the flashier hire with a bigger upside...wonder if they knew that Butch was regularly whooping Charlie's butt back then?
2. Talent differentials certainly played a role in these victories ... but was Butch playing with the more talented, or the less talented team? Not an easy question to answer. I'm gonna guess it's roughly a wash...he probably had more talent about half the time, and less the other half. Bottom line is, he kept winning, and against good coaches.
But I never really dug down to find out exactly who he played during those six years as head coach before he got to Knoxville. This morning, I did. Here's what I found:
- Oct 07 - CMU beat Ball State, coached by Brady Hoke
- Sep 08 - CMU beat Ohio, coached by Frank Solich (beat him again in the 2009 MAC CG)
- Sep 08 - CMU beat Buffalo, coached by Turner Gill (beat him again in 2009)
- Sep 09 - CMU beat Michigan State, coached by Mark Dantonio
- Oct 10 - Cincy beat Louisville, coached by Charlie Strong (beat him again in 2011)
- Nov 10 - Cincy beat Rutgers, coached by Greg Schiano
- Sep 11 - Cincy beat NC State, coached by Tom O'Brien
- Oct 11 - Cincy beat South Florida, coached by Skip Holtz (beat him again in 2012)
- Dec 11 - Cincy beat Vanderbilt, coached by James Franklin
- Sep 12 - Cincy beat Virginia Tech, coached by Frank Beamer
- Dec 12 - Cincy beat Duke, coached by David Cutcliffe
Granted, Butch hasn't yet beaten Nick Saban or Urban Meyer, Mark Richt or Les Miles. He hasn't yet dominated most of the absolute best of the best college football coaches. But he has beaten one of them: Steve Spurrier. And he's done it twice in a row. The first time with equal or less talent. And he has certainly proven he can win chess matches against the second-highest tier, the Frank Beamers and David Cutcliffes and Tom O'Briens and Greg Schianos and Mark Dantonios.
Yes, Butch still has to prove it on the field, against Saban. Against Richt. And hopefully soon, against Meyer. And I think he's gonna do fine. In fact, I think 2015 is the year where he adds notches to his belt for one or two of those other top-tier coaches. Go Vols!
NOTES:
1. Did you pick up on the amusing irony concerning Charlie Strong? Some in VN wanted Strong instead of Jones as our new head coach, thinking Strong was the flashier hire with a bigger upside...wonder if they knew that Butch was regularly whooping Charlie's butt back then?
2. Talent differentials certainly played a role in these victories ... but was Butch playing with the more talented, or the less talented team? Not an easy question to answer. I'm gonna guess it's roughly a wash...he probably had more talent about half the time, and less the other half. Bottom line is, he kept winning, and against good coaches.
Last edited: