- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 285,483
- Likes
- 233,569
Agree about the OL but I'm still not 100% convinced that Dobbs is the guy to get us to that next level. I love the kid but he's got to be able to throw down field.
The 2010 offensive line was nearly as bad as this year's and they improved dramatically by 2011.
Not saying we have a James, Fulton, or Stone on this Oline, but I expect a jump from nearly dead last in sacks given up to somewhere around 60th-70th nationally. No miracles, but it would be good enough to not be a huge liability.
Agree about the OL but I'm still not 100% convinced that Dobbs is the guy to get us to that next level. I love the kid but he's got to be able to throw down field.
I'm afraid your right. A bad line will make these RB's look like 1 star recruits.
Maybe someone can enlighten me ( That's right, not everyone on here knows everything ) but, most of us with any sense know the reasons for the issues with the offense. You know, terrible line dealt, injuries, etc.! We are getting highly touted RB's to commit as we speak! If I am a running back I wouldn't want to run behind the line we have! Now, i know we will be better, and maybe a RB recruit believes we will be much better at o-line, but it surprises me that we can recruit good RB's even though the o-line struggled so much and was obviously the reason for lack of production!
Don't get me wrong, I am ecstatic over our recruiting!
You may get some grief for this but it makes perfect sense. One would think that they would want a line that increases their stats yet, they keep signing.
Nobody doubts the staffs recruiting ability but this is noteworthy.