lukeneyland
God Save the Heup
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Messages
- 5,255
- Likes
- 8,329
Am I the only person here thats a bit disturbed, that the woman who accused Johnson of rape is essentially allowed to do so under total anonymity? While guilty or innocent she is already able to drag Johnson's name through the preverbal mud. I understand that law enforcement could be concerned about her safety, if her name was to be made public. However the same logic could still be applied to Johnson, since for all any of us know he could be guiltless in the matter, and now no matter the outcome his name has already been tarnished. Just does not seem like equal treatment by the law, regarding the accuser and the accused.
As you can see AJ's name is there for the world to scrutinize, while hers is kept totally private
As you can see AJ's name is there for the world to scrutinize, while hers is kept totally private
Attachments
Last edited: