If I See This At Game Start, I'm Good...

[T_man_J]

If we come out with a 10 personnel grouping or 11 with the tight end in the slot position, it will be a blow out (in our favor).

This configuration will force Utah State to go into man defense; if this happens, our big receivers should dominate the Utah State secondary.

Go Vols!

 

[zjcvols]

Oh I guess Utah State should forfeit after that then

 

[T_man_J]

Oh I guess Utah State should forfeit after that then

Yes, next question.

 

[T_man_J]

Oh I guess Utah State should forfeit after that then

BTW, you are a moderator. Do you know what a 10 personnel grouping is?

 

[Vol8188]

If we come out with a 10 personnel grouping or 11 with the tight end in the slot position, it will be a blow out (in our favor).

This configuration will force Utah State to go into man defense; if this happens, our big receivers should dominate the Utah State secondary.

Go Vols!

Why will they have too play man against 10 or 11?

And what else would we come out in? Those were our two main groupings last year.

 

[omghulkhands]

BTW, you are a moderator. Do you know what a 10 personnel grouping is?

Dooley would use a 13 personnel grouping

 

[Biopsyman]

Dooley and Chaney loved the wildcat

 

[T_man_J]

Why will they have too play man against 10 or 11?

And what else would we come out in? Those were our two main groupings last year.

With a 10 Utah State will probably go man; with an 11 they will probably go cover 1. If they are cover 1, I believe that Worley will make the read. Even If Worley throws into double coverage, I think that our receivers will make the play.

 

[mdrew27]

They're a man team. We should kill them.

 

[omghulkhands]

With a 10 Utah State will probably go man; with an 11 they will probably go cover 1. If they are cover 1, I believe that Worley will make the read. Even If Worley throws into double coverage, I think that our receivers will make the play.

"Billy, what did I tell you about throwing into double coverage? Completions into triple coverage are way more awesome"

-Brett Favre

 

[Vol8188]

With a 10 Utah State will probably go man; with an 11 they will probably go cover 1. If they are cover 1, I believe that Worley will make the read. Even If Worley throws into double coverage, I think that our receivers will make the play.

Why would they go 0 against 10 personnel and cover 1 against 11?

 

[T_man_J]

Why would they go 0 against 10 personnel and cover 1 against 11?

I believe that they think they can cover our TE's with an LB; that will free up a safety to play zone. But if we go 10, I think they will be forced into man. Either way, we should have the advantage.

 

[Vol8188]

I believe that they think they can cover our TE's with an LB; that will free up a safety to play zone. But if we go 10, I think they will be forced into man. Either way, we should have the advantage.

Why will they be forced into man?

 

[AboveAllNations]

BTW, you are a moderator. Do you know what a 10 personnel grouping is?

 

[amavol2]

It would not surprise me if they come out in some sort of zone due to the fact we have all new oline. If they can stop the run with 6 they will not be in zero coverage. IMO

 

[Vol8188]

Oh I guess Utah State should forfeit after that then

Sounds like the op finally learned about personnel groupings and needed a reason to brag about it.

 

[OrangeBlood4life]

Would someone like to explain what a 10 personnel grouping is for us simpletons

 

[FiremedicVOL127]

BTW, you are a moderator. Do you know what a 10 personnel grouping is?

I know, I know, a 5 yard penalty for not enough players on the field..........

 

[jkleno]

If we come out with a 10 personnel grouping or 11 with the tight end in the slot position, it will be a blow out (in our favor).

This configuration will force Utah State to go into man defense; if this happens, our big receivers should dominate the Utah State secondary.

Go Vols!

Can anyone forward tHIS to CBJ before game time?

 

[orange parmejohn]

Sounds like the op finally learned about personnel groupings and needed a reason to brag about it.

I don't think the post you quoted was necessary in response to the OP. He just mentioned a possible matchup problem.

 

[BookVol]

I know, I know, a 5 yard penalty for not enough players on the field..........

Not a penalty for that, just a disadvantage.

 

[orange parmejohn]

It would be nice to have a few more people that like to talk football, and a few less who creep threads looking for opportunities to be sarcastic. JMO.

 

[FiremedicVOL127]

Not a penalty for that, just a disadvantage.

I know, was just tryin to make a goof. Sorry

 

[sofflavol]

Would someone like to explain what a 10 personnel grouping is for us simpletons

hes saying we come out with 4 WR 1 RB formation

 

[salutethehill]

I hope we can turn some double plays and maybe force an alley oop into a hat trick.