2795 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on Phil Steele has us in top 30... (ranked #27) Page 3. within the forum Tennessee Vols Football. Originally Posted by Kurtastrophe I rank the Orlando Sentinel at about the same level as the Bleacher Report. Agreed, I ...

Go Back   VolNation > Tennessee Vols Forums > Tennessee Vols Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2012, 02:16 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
98utvols's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 441
Likes: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtastrophe View Post
I rank the Orlando Sentinel at about the same level as the Bleacher Report.
Agreed, I know we have alot to prove but they are obviously going purely off last years record.
98utvols is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:16 PM   #32 (permalink)
Amatuer Analyst
 
UTGhostHunter's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98utvols View Post
check out these preseason rankings in the orlando sentinal

#88 Tennessee just above #89 Kent State

Tennessee college football countdown: College Football Countdown: No. 88 Tennessee - Orlando Sentinel

That is hilariously stupid! How is it that Tennessee is supposed to get worse than they were a year ago? That must be what they're predicting with us at #88. Did you notice Kansas at #95? The same Kansas I've recently heard sports people talk about as a bowl team. Hey, Orlando Sentinel, could you be any more transparent? We can all see you making selections based on who you dislike. So very funny!
UTGhostHunter is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:18 PM   #33 (permalink)
Respects the "Process"
 
Kurtastrophe's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98utvols View Post
Agreed, I know we have alot to prove but they are obviously going purely off last years record.
That, and you might as well call them the Gainesville Gazette.
Kurtastrophe is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:30 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ACvol3's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Clinton/Knoxville, TN
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 4,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTGhostHunter View Post

That is hilariously stupid! How is it that Tennessee is supposed to get worse than they were a year ago? That must be what they're predicting with us at #88. Did you notice Kansas at #95? The same Kansas I've recently heard sports people talk about as a bowl team. Hey, Orlando Sentinel, could you be any more transparent? We can all see you making selections based on who you dislike. So very funny!
U don't think they r bias in any way do u?
ACvol3 is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:33 PM   #35 (permalink)
Amatuer Analyst
 
UTGhostHunter's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACvol3 View Post
U don't think they r bias in any way do u?
Nope, they're as unbiased as my preseason All-SEC with thirteen Vols in it. There's no lean whatsoever.
UTGhostHunter is offline  
VN Likes: 3
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:39 PM   #36 (permalink)
MNV®
 
King Webbsticles's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTGhostHunter View Post
The same Kansas I've recently heard sports people talk about as a bowl team.
Kansas is terrible. It would take a miracle to make a bowl next season. #89 may be a generous ranking, IMO.
King Webbsticles is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:44 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
lilesrt's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outdors21 View Post

Even if the defense is dead last, we'd be above the bottom 3 overall.
We have a top-3 SEC offense coming into the year.

That hasn't proved a thing.
lilesrt is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:45 PM   #38 (permalink)
5* drivel ------->
 
fade route's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 6,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98utvols View Post
check out these preseason rankings in the orlando sentinal

#88 Tennessee just above #89 Kent State

Tennessee college football countdown: College Football Countdown: No. 88 Tennessee - Orlando Sentinel



Consider the source
fade route is online now  
VN Likes: 1
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:55 PM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
vol2002's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deep in yankee territory
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 1,086
The Orlando Sentinel had us winning 2 SEC games in 2011 (despite only winning 1) and still put us at #88. That will be easy to beat.

Personally, I think we'll finish in the top 25 and get a bowl win this year.

I base that on the number of returning starters and the potency and depth of our offense, coupled with an easier schedule than last year.
vol2002 is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:58 PM   #40 (permalink)
revolUTion in the air!
 
Vol8188's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 1,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAVol View Post
Let's put it this way . . . Vandy, Kentucky and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. The question is, who is the 4th worst, at least on paper. We're definitely a candidate.
Lol really? We're a candidate for being ranked below one of those teams on paper? I'm pretty sure that if we are strictly talking about "on paper" then we are top 5 in the SEC. "On paper" we have the 3 best wr's in the SEC. "On paper" we have a qb who if not the best, is no worse than 3rd out of one hell of a crop of qbs. "On paper" we are returning almost everyone!
Vol8188 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 02:59 PM   #41 (permalink)
Amatuer Analyst
 
UTGhostHunter's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Webbsticles View Post
Kansas is terrible. It would take a miracle to make a bowl next season. #89 may be a generous ranking, IMO.
A) They were ranked #95, not #89. B) Dayne Crist is immediately eligible and has already won the starting job. C) Charlie Weis was getting the most out of Brantley last season before he went down and the offense was playing solid. He'll get Kansas's offense going. Although I don't love the Kansas defense, there is certainly the potential in the Big 12 for a Kansas to get bowl eligible with a strong offensive effort. I think they are better than Baylor this year. I also think they are better than Iowa State. They have a cupcake non-conference schedule. If they can find a sixth win, which isn't impossible, they are bowl eligible. Their offense could be very good, with a balanced rushing attack and a strong passing game.
UTGhostHunter is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 03:06 PM   #42 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
vol2013's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vol8188 View Post
Lol really? We're a candidate for being ranked below one of those teams on paper? I'm pretty sure that if we are strictly talking about "on paper" then we are top 5 in the SEC. "On paper" we have the 3 best wr's in the SEC. "On paper" we have a qb who if not the best, is no worse than 3rd out of one hell of a crop of qbs. "On paper" we are returning almost everyone!
He said Vandy, Kentucky, and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. That means we are not a candidate for being ranked lower than them. However, that would only put us at eleven if you just consider those three.
vol2013 is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 03:07 PM   #43 (permalink)
revolUTion in the air!
 
Vol8188's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 1,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by vol2013 View Post
He said Vandy, Kentucky, and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. That means we are not a candidate for being ranked lower than them. However, that would only put us at eleven if you just consider those three.
I see that now. I misread. My bad, thanks for catching that.
Vol8188 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 03:10 PM   #44 (permalink)
Flammable when sparked!
 
vollygirl's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 32,383
Likes: 5,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by vol2013 View Post
He said Vandy, Kentucky, and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. That means we are not a candidate for being ranked lower than them. However, that would only put us at eleven if you just consider those three.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vol8188 View Post
I see that now. I misread. My bad, thanks for catching that.
If everybody could carry on a conversation like you guys....
__________________
Curious people are interesting people. I wonder why that is?
vollygirl is offline  
VN Likes: 1
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 05-19-2012, 04:15 PM   #45 (permalink)
MNV®
 
King Webbsticles's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTGhostHunter View Post
A) They were ranked #95, not #89. B) Dayne Crist is immediately eligible and has already won the starting job. C) Charlie Weis was getting the most out of Brantley last season before he went down and the offense was playing solid. He'll get Kansas's offense going. Although I don't love the Kansas defense, there is certainly the potential in the Big 12 for a Kansas to get bowl eligible with a strong offensive effort. I think they are better than Baylor this year. I also think they are better than Iowa State. They have a cupcake non-conference schedule. If they can find a sixth win, which isn't impossible, they are bowl eligible. Their offense could be very good, with a balanced rushing attack and a strong passing game.
A. My apologies.

B. Maybe because the rest of the team is terrible.

c. Lol
King Webbsticles is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27