 | |
05-19-2012, 02:16 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 441
Likes: 156
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtastrophe I rank the Orlando Sentinel at about the same level as the Bleacher Report. | Agreed, I know we have alot to prove but they are obviously going purely off last years record. |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:16 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
| | Amatuer Analyst Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 616
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 98utvols | 
That is hilariously stupid! How is it that Tennessee is supposed to get worse than they were a year ago? That must be what they're predicting with us at #88. Did you notice Kansas at #95? The same Kansas I've recently heard sports people talk about as a bowl team. Hey, Orlando Sentinel, could you be any more transparent? We can all see you making selections based on who you dislike. So very funny!  |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:18 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Respects the "Process" Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 642
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 98utvols Agreed, I know we have alot to prove but they are obviously going purely off last years record. | That, and you might as well call them the Gainesville Gazette. |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:30 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
| | Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Clinton/Knoxville, TN
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 4,128
| Quote:
Originally Posted by UTGhostHunter 
That is hilariously stupid! How is it that Tennessee is supposed to get worse than they were a year ago? That must be what they're predicting with us at #88. Did you notice Kansas at #95? The same Kansas I've recently heard sports people talk about as a bowl team. Hey, Orlando Sentinel, could you be any more transparent? We can all see you making selections based on who you dislike. So very funny!  | U don't think they r bias in any way do u? |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:33 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
| | Amatuer Analyst Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 616
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ACvol3 U don't think they r bias in any way do u? | Nope, they're as unbiased as my preseason All-SEC with thirteen Vols in it. There's no lean whatsoever. |
| VN Likes: 3 |
05-19-2012, 02:39 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | MNV® Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 1,117
| Quote:
Originally Posted by UTGhostHunter The same Kansas I've recently heard sports people talk about as a bowl team. | Kansas is terrible. It would take a miracle to make a bowl next season. #89 may be a generous ranking, IMO. |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:44 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
| | Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 358
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Outdors21
Even if the defense is dead last, we'd be above the bottom 3 overall. | We have a top-3 SEC offense coming into the year.
That hasn't proved a thing. |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:45 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
| | 5* drivel -------> Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 6,951
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 98utvols |
Consider the source |
| VN Likes: 1 |
05-19-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
| | Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Deep in yankee territory
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 1,086
| The Orlando Sentinel had us winning 2 SEC games in 2011 (despite only winning 1) and still put us at #88. That will be easy to beat.
Personally, I think we'll finish in the top 25 and get a bowl win this year.
I base that on the number of returning starters and the potency and depth of our offense, coupled with an easier schedule than last year. |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:58 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
| | revolUTion in the air! Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 1,387
| Quote:
Originally Posted by GAVol Let's put it this way . . . Vandy, Kentucky and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. The question is, who is the 4th worst, at least on paper. We're definitely a candidate. | Lol really? We're a candidate for being ranked below one of those teams on paper? I'm pretty sure that if we are strictly talking about "on paper" then we are top 5 in the SEC. "On paper" we have the 3 best wr's in the SEC. "On paper" we have a qb who if not the best, is no worse than 3rd out of one hell of a crop of qbs. "On paper" we are returning almost everyone! |
| |
05-19-2012, 02:59 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
| | Amatuer Analyst Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 616
| Quote:
Originally Posted by King Webbsticles Kansas is terrible. It would take a miracle to make a bowl next season. #89 may be a generous ranking, IMO. | A) They were ranked #95, not #89. B) Dayne Crist is immediately eligible and has already won the starting job. C) Charlie Weis was getting the most out of Brantley last season before he went down and the offense was playing solid. He'll get Kansas's offense going. Although I don't love the Kansas defense, there is certainly the potential in the Big 12 for a Kansas to get bowl eligible with a strong offensive effort. I think they are better than Baylor this year. I also think they are better than Iowa State. They have a cupcake non-conference schedule. If they can find a sixth win, which isn't impossible, they are bowl eligible. Their offense could be very good, with a balanced rushing attack and a strong passing game. |
| |
05-19-2012, 03:06 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
| | Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3,002
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Vol8188 Lol really? We're a candidate for being ranked below one of those teams on paper? I'm pretty sure that if we are strictly talking about "on paper" then we are top 5 in the SEC. "On paper" we have the 3 best wr's in the SEC. "On paper" we have a qb who if not the best, is no worse than 3rd out of one hell of a crop of qbs. "On paper" we are returning almost everyone! | He said Vandy, Kentucky, and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. That means we are not a candidate for being ranked lower than them. However, that would only put us at eleven if you just consider those three. |
| |
05-19-2012, 03:07 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
| | revolUTion in the air! Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 1,387
| Quote:
Originally Posted by vol2013 He said Vandy, Kentucky, and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. That means we are not a candidate for being ranked lower than them. However, that would only put us at eleven if you just consider those three. | I see that now. I misread. My bad, thanks for catching that. |
| |
05-19-2012, 03:10 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
| | Flammable when sparked! Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 32,383
Likes: 5,489
| Quote:
Originally Posted by vol2013 He said Vandy, Kentucky, and Ole Miss are clearly worse than we are. That means we are not a candidate for being ranked lower than them. However, that would only put us at eleven if you just consider those three. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Vol8188 I see that now. I misread. My bad, thanks for catching that. | If everybody could carry on a conversation like you guys....
__________________ Curious people are interesting people. I wonder why that is? |
| VN Likes: 1 |
05-19-2012, 04:15 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
| | MNV® Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 1,117
| Quote:
Originally Posted by UTGhostHunter A) They were ranked #95, not #89. B) Dayne Crist is immediately eligible and has already won the starting job. C) Charlie Weis was getting the most out of Brantley last season before he went down and the offense was playing solid. He'll get Kansas's offense going. Although I don't love the Kansas defense, there is certainly the potential in the Big 12 for a Kansas to get bowl eligible with a strong offensive effort. I think they are better than Baylor this year. I also think they are better than Iowa State. They have a cupcake non-conference schedule. If they can find a sixth win, which isn't impossible, they are bowl eligible. Their offense could be very good, with a balanced rushing attack and a strong passing game. | A. My apologies.
B. Maybe because the rest of the team is terrible.
c. Lol |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |