808 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on RB Situation Page 3. within the forum Tennessee Vols Football. Originally Posted by chatt-townVOL You lost me at diddy poo Lol. Sorry. I got it from one of Jim Mora's ...

Go Back   VolNation > Tennessee Vols Forums > Tennessee Vols Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2012, 08:36 AM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Teeman's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 502
Likes: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by chatt-townVOL View Post
You lost me at diddy poo
Lol. Sorry. I got it from one of Jim Mora's post-game rants.
Teeman is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 08:49 AM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gunner's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 583
Likes: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by alldayvols View Post
8 wins? I believe we can win em all!!!! Have confidence!
I believe Dooley must win nine to keep his job that loss to Ky Jelly was very damaging for his creditably going forward last season, 8-4 in the regular season and a loss in a bowl game will be his undoing.
gunner is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 09:19 AM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
otis72's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: trash can behind east town mall
Posts: 709
Likes: 158
momma dont let your babies grow up to be ky jelllyyyyyssssss....whooo go vols
otis72 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 09:53 AM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcrrcr View Post
If Neal continues to have fumble problems, could they give him a look at DB? Good size and great speed for the position. Would redshirt him next year. Hope he corrects his fumble problem, we need him a RB.

Lets keep Neal where he is. Adrain Foster had problems with fumbling and now is an elite NFL rb. Jay Graham is paid to fix problems like this so lets give him a chance before we start shuffling Neal to a new position. Neal was thrilled to get the chance to be a full time rb so here is his chance. Most college teams don't give one rb 35 carries a game much anymore so you need 2 rb rotating or even more. Don't sell Neal short just yet this is a problem that can be corrected. As for who starts, the question is not relevant. We run the ball say 150 yards a game on average with 2-3 rb problem fixed.

Last edited by dw0731; 04-15-2012 at 10:00 AM..
dw0731 is offline  
VN Likes: 1
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 10:09 AM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teeman View Post
Let me first say, I don't know diddy-poo about the RB situation, but...from the outside looking in, it doesn't look good. Someone with some information, please correct me and make me feel better. I know it's early, but we've seen enough from some of these guys to form an opinion. We have Lane, who is inconsistent, Neal who has ball-security issues, Young who doesn't have the size to run between the tackles, Smith who has been eerily quiet, ditto for Hill, and Borque who may not even play RB. I don't think we have an every-down back on roster which tells me and every other SEC defense what our offense will be like. A shame really when you consider the talent on the line. We will be pass-happy for sure, but you have to have someone who can pick up a 1st down. Flame away, but the lack of a run game has tormented me for years and years.
Lane, Young and Neal are all having a goos Spring.

Don't worry about RB, worry about the line.
Ten_Titans is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 10:35 AM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mtn_vol64's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 108
Likes: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vols4us View Post
Let the coaches figure it out. Will be better than #116 from last season if they just run forward and fall down.

Lane is the man this year regardless. Lane will be 2 years removed from the ACL and back to full speed. Neal needs to decide whether to get it done right as a RB, play slot receiver, or go home. Bourque and Hill are the real deals. They are tough. Bourque's not here yet. Hill has mono. DY is the X factor.

Freak out later, it's just April.
Neal and Lane look neck and neck in terms of ability to me. Neal is a bigger guy. their footwork through CG's drills mirrored each other. The only guy I saw get work at the slot was Lane. Young isn't big but he goes wide open through the drills and you can tell that Neal and Lane are pacing themselves.
mtn_vol64 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 11:02 AM   #37 (permalink)
Take it sleazy.
 
Kingston Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,448
Likes: 2,081
I think we'll see D. Young's carries go up to about 10-12 a game. He's running very well in practice on limited carries.
Kingston Vol is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 11:05 AM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 971
Hard to believe that getting stud RB has been had been difficult considering the opportunity
Biopsyman is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 11:55 AM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,329
Likes: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJWeeks View Post
D Young continues to impress. Dont expect him to start at RB but 7 to 10 touches a game at rb will happen!
Not a chance. He's about third on the depth chart of a pass-happy offense.
__________________
Vol423 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 11:58 AM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Gramps's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 7,586
Likes: 1,713
D. Young may be a nice surprise. He may be small but he is quick and fast.
Gramps is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 12:12 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 55
[QUOTE=WA_Vol;6621896]I thought recruiting a really good RB in this last recruitin class would have been priority #1. Not sure Dooley got the job done, he did recruit Bourque who was listed as an athlete but wants to play RB. He is a little taller then most backs.

wasn't Eddie George was 6'3'' or 6'4''???
fishheadspin is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 12:23 PM   #42 (permalink)
VN GURU
 
WA_Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 502
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewh View Post
By all accounts we did get a very good back with Borque. And Hill may be a pleasant surprise as well. Side note, we may be the only two Seattle members here.
I've only lived in Seattle 5 months, but so far it has really grown on me. Especially now since the weather has warmed up.

Back to Bourque, I don't follow recruiting except for what Scout and Rivals say about them. Scout listed him as a #29 RB and a 3 star. I'm a little bit disappointed UT didn't land a top 10 RB with the starting RB position up for grabs. Scout.com: Davante' Bourque Profile

[QUOTE=fishheadspin;6622734]
Quote:
Originally Posted by WA_Vol View Post
I thought recruiting a really good RB in this last recruitin class would have been priority #1. Not sure Dooley got the job done, he did recruit Bourque who was listed as an athlete but wants to play RB. He is a little taller then most backs.
Not sure about EG but Bourque is listed at 6'3 on Scout. The conventional wisdom now after Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith is that the shorter backs have better balance. Don't know if that is really true.
Davante Bourque - Yahoo! Sports

Last edited by WA_Vol; 04-15-2012 at 12:57 PM..
WA_Vol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 12:43 PM   #43 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jamarglevol's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishheadspin View Post

Not sure about EG but Bourque is listed at 6'3 on Scout. The conventional wisdom now after Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith is that the shorter backs have better balance. Don't know if that is really true.
Davante Bourque - Yahoo! Sports
I don't think it's true...Steven Jackson and Eric Dickerson managed to overcome their height...not saying bourque would be anything like those guys but they're the reason I don't put much value in size
jamarglevol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 12:48 PM   #44 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jamarglevol's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by WA_Vol View Post
I thought recruiting a really good RB in this last recruitin class would have been priority #1. Not sure Dooley got the job done, he did recruit Bourque who was listed as an athlete but wants to play RB. He is a little taller then most backs.

wasn't Eddie George was 6'3'' or 6'4''???
Yup yup Eddie George was listed at 6'3
jamarglevol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-15-2012, 12:57 PM   #45 (permalink)
5* drivel ------->
 
fade route's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 6,838
Likes: 6,700
I've never been impressed with Neal at RB, but he shocked me at WR - catches the deep ball better than Rogers imo.....'Eep him at WR. Let Borque come in a split carries with Lane. That's our best hope at). BTW, we don't need to be air force and run for 300+ yds a game.....we just need to be effective when we need to be - 1st and 2nd down.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
fade route is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27