Is anyone else tired of Dooley's...

[Cheese Donkey]

Originally Posted by fishheadspin

i thought he threw everyone under the bus, but now he does not tell the media anything about players situations??? i am confused,,,,jeez

Talking about what the players do on the field is one thing, but stuff off the field is a whole different story. Also, please provide me quotes where Dooley "threw players under the bus."

[VolMaster14]

Originally Posted by otis72

dooley is just as bad as dramma queen as any of them,i bet we see a miget take the team out of the tee in the first game this year.the dooley circus show...sigh

*tea

[AJeray4TN]

Originally Posted by VolMaster14

*tea

*tea-hee

[supersmo18]

Originally Posted by SeanJean

I agree completely, just giving the counterpoint.

K, good. Sorry, just a little tired of all the nonsense. Carry on.

[2ironVol]

I actually like the manner in which Dooley deals with the media. He's a great wise ass when asked idiotic questions. He's got a way of looking at someone like their stupid when they ask a ridiculous question.

[e-VOL-ution2013]

Originally Posted by cncchris33

...cryptic approach with the media? I want to like the guy. I really do, but with the circus-esque fiasco of Janzen Jackson last summer, and now with DaRick Rogers, his word-play with the media and his overall antagonistic approach is getting old. He won't say DaRick Rogers is suspended, but says that "he has some things to do before he can come back, and if he doesn't do them, he won't be here". Is that not the textbook definition of a suspension?

So you want him to say he is suspended but yet you say he basically said the same thing?

If Dooley did say he was supsended then they would spin it on what he did and is he off the team. Besides there are still some things in the world that don't need to be printed or publicized!

[sjt18]

Originally Posted by cncchris33

...cryptic approach with the media? I want to like the guy. I really do, but with the circus-esque fiasco of Janzen Jackson last summer, and now with DaRick Rogers, his word-play with the media and his overall antagonistic approach is getting old. He won't say DaRick Rogers is suspended, but says that "he has some things to do before he can come back, and if he doesn't do them, he won't be here". Is that not the textbook definition of a suspension?

No. Just the opposite actually. I am tired of the UT media's antagonistic approach towards the program generally and Dooley in particular.

On the one hand, fans accuse him of throwing players under the bus. On the other, they get annoyed when he's evasive over serious, potentially career ending and reputation destroying discipline issues.

How is he supposed to win with you?

[sjt18]

Originally Posted by 2ironVol

I actually like the manner in which Dooley deals with the media. He's a great wise ass when asked idiotic questions. He's got a way of looking at someone like their stupid when they ask a ridiculous question.

Me too.... I just hope he can coach well enough that we can continue to get that entertainment.

[82_VOL_83]

Originally Posted by 99gator

i know people will disagree with you, but i agree.

i will say it's not just dooley. the reason i feel they should be more open is that typically people begin to think the worst of the player involved (in this case rogers).

i understand keeping things in house, but it's not cool having all of this wild speculation running around either.

Not your concern. This is a Tennessee Volunteer matter. Not a gator matter.

[BaldBiker]

Originally Posted by AJeray4TN

Banning posters seems like a better idea.

Agree

[e-VOL-ution2013]

Originally Posted by 2ironVol

I actually like the manner in which Dooley deals with the media. He's a great wise ass when asked idiotic questions. He's got a way of looking at someone like their stupid when they ask a ridiculous question.

Which is pretty much every question.

[82_VOL_83]

Originally Posted by cncchris33

...cryptic approach with the media? I want to like the guy. I really do, but with the circus-esque fiasco of Janzen Jackson last summer, and now with DaRick Rogers, his word-play with the media and his overall antagonistic approach is getting old. He won't say DaRick Rogers is suspended, but says that "he has some things to do before he can come back, and if he doesn't do them, he won't be here". Is that not the textbook definition of a suspension?

If I was asked 10,000 questions about one person, I would probably snap and tell the media what they could do with themselves. Just got through listening to the press conference....again. I am surprised he is as civil as he is.

[cncchris33]

Originally Posted by utvolpj

just because you define it one way doesn't mean Dooley has to

I can't redefine the word, suspension. He shouldn't either. It is what it is. If I laid out his terms and asked you to define the situation, you would call it a suspension 10 times out of 10.

[DougVol]

Originally Posted by columbia vol

Maybe you should worry about muschump instead of the tn coach

Exactly, Muschamp is a freaking weirdo on the sidelines. It's emabarrassing to watch.

[82_VOL_83]

Originally Posted by GAVol

it's easy. Just concoct an alternate reality in your mind and start whining.

Oh wait, what are the forum rules on thumbs up'ing a moderator???