Marlin Lane

[seaofORANGE22]

I too share in the OP's enthusiasm over Mr. Lane. He was sick for the first 2 or 3 games last year. That little flash of explosiveness was all I needed for my optimism.

[gnm53108]

I'm excited about see our running game this year. Marlin has the potential to be special.

Anybody else think we might see our little speedster Devrin Young get more reps this year?

[VolenteerSpirit]

I know the 40 time shows explosiveness.
I would like to see a 60 meter cut back drill time become a 2nd measurement for grading a RB skill set. 10 meters, cutback, 10, cutback, 10, ect. I think this would really give some idea of talent. Where the 40 times show only straight line acceleration, using both to measure the total skills needed in the RB position would give a better view of the players potential. It also serves to strengthen the tendons and ligaments in the knee, making knee injuries less common. If it is incorporated into College ball, it will be adopted by high schools Very quickly. Down and Back drills are used, but not timed and that doesn’t provide the motivation (Bragging Rights) that 40 times do. Just a though. Anyone else think that would be a good idea?

[barknoxbrawler]

Originally Posted by VolenteerSpirit

I know the 40 time shows explosiveness.
I would like to see a 60 meter cut back drill time become a 2nd measurement for grading a RB skill set. 10 meters, cutback, 10, cutback, 10, ect. I think this would really give some idea of talent. Where the 40 times show only straight line acceleration, using both to measure the total skills needed in the RB position would give a better view of the players potential. It also serves to strengthen the tendons and ligaments in the knee, making knee injuries less common. If it is incorporated into College ball, it will be adopted by high schools Very quickly. Down and Back drills are used, but not timed and that doesn’t provide the motivation (Bragging Rights) that 40 times do. Just a though. Anyone else think that would be a good idea?

Sure. Another good idea- taco bell for lunch.

[VolPride14]

Originally Posted by hillsborovol

Exactly. Serious knee injuries often take 2 years to recover from...one for physical healing and another one for mental recovery from fear of tearing it up again (e.g. Jamal Lewis).

So, this year should tell the tale on whether Marlin is going to be a great one or not.

Doesn't make me feel good about Hunter. If it does, I'm sure we could just say run to the endzone and chuck it up. Not many people would stop him. Maybe we don't see as many crossing patterns from him and more deep post and streak patterns?

[m1al]

Originally Posted by fade route

Nah, let's just say they blow over and over again......watching homers go ape is funny sometimes
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I'd rather watch the homers than the 'who sh!t in my oatmeal' crowd... I can't stand people who b!tch and whine all the time... That's just me though...

[DjCrenshaw]

Originally Posted by m1al

I'd rather watch the homers than the 'who sh!t in my oatmeal' crowd... I can't stand people who b!tch and whine all the time... That's just me though...

That's not how you make oatmeal

[Smokeyman]

Originally Posted by ACvol3

Skeeter sure hyped him up like freaking crazy before the season last year..

U can put me on that list too. And we would be justified if you watch his jr. highlights. Farking beast. If he can get back the confidence in his knee the kid will be a quicker, faster version of Hardesty.

[Smokeyman]

Originally Posted by m1al

I'd rather watch the homers than the 'who sh!t in my oatmeal' crowd... I can't stand people who b!tch and whine all the time... That's just me though...

Very valid point, but it's best to not feed the troll. Just put him on your ignore list like I did months ago and move along. You'll feel better instantly!

[VolinDawgland]

Originally Posted by Volman09

I don't understand why people are so quick to write off Marlin Lane. He was a freshman last year coming off a knee injury in high school. I expect him to be full speed this year along with a year of experience. I think he rushes for 1000 and 10 TD's this fall.

I think that's plausible

[hndog609]

Originally Posted by VolenteerSpirit

I know the 40 time shows explosiveness.
I would like to see a 60 meter cut back drill time become a 2nd measurement for grading a RB skill set. 10 meters, cutback, 10, cutback, 10, ect. I think this would really give some idea of talent. Where the 40 times show only straight line acceleration, using both to measure the total skills needed in the RB position would give a better view of the players potential. It also serves to strengthen the tendons and ligaments in the knee, making knee injuries less common. If it is incorporated into College ball, it will be adopted by high schools Very quickly. Down and Back drills are used, but not timed and that doesn’t provide the motivation (Bragging Rights) that 40 times do. Just a though. Anyone else think that would be a good idea?

The NFL combine does include timed 20y & 60y shuttle runs to go along with the 3 cone drill. Shuttle is also a timed event at some HS events as it's often listed on Rivals.

[FreshmanVFL]

He is a baller on the bball court!

[VolenteerSpirit]

Originally Posted by hndog609

The NFL combine does include timed 20y & 60y shuttle runs to go along with the 3 cone drill. Shuttle is also a timed event at some HS events as it's often listed on Rivals.

Good Call the Shuttle is an ok measure. I have never seen a HS that runs the Shuttle though. I am not saying there are none. I am sure there are a few in GA and FL. The only HS kids that I have ever seen with the shuttle times noted are ones that went to a BCS School's camp and not even all the Backs that have get the Shuttle times noted. I don’t even think all BSC Schools do the Shuttle in their Combine’s.
I’m getting at that it should be considered just as, if not more important than the 40 time. I like the Shuttle… ok, but the more cut backs you can put in the better. Thus the 6x10y. It would be a direct measure of a players ability to change direction. It would also provide fortification to those knee joints. I had a coach in HS that made us hop the bleachers, I hated those. Jumping every step 2 footed rather than run them. Looking back to never having a knee injury in Football or Soccer, it was worth it. The low impact training crap is no good. You have to trigger growth for the bones and connective tissue to make them stronger. You trigger that growth by agitating them.

[OrangeDog]

Originally Posted by VolenteerSpirit

I know the 40 time shows explosiveness.
I would like to see a 60 meter cut back drill time become a 2nd measurement for grading a RB skill set. 10 meters, cutback, 10, cutback, 10, ect. I think this would really give some idea of talent. Where the 40 times show only straight line acceleration, using both to measure the total skills needed in the RB position would give a better view of the players potential. It also serves to strengthen the tendons and ligaments in the knee, making knee injuries less common. If it is incorporated into College ball, it will be adopted by high schools Very quickly. Down and Back drills are used, but not timed and that doesn’t provide the motivation (Bragging Rights) that 40 times do. Just a though. Anyone else think that would be a good idea?

All you need to do is a muscle biopsy to check for Fast Twitch Fibers..... Then we'll know all we need to.

duh?!?!

[jasonvol18]

Originally Posted by Volman09

I don't understand why people are so quick to write off Marlin Lane. He was a freshman last year coming off a knee injury in high school. I expect him to be full speed this year along with a year of experience. I think he rushes for 1000 and 10 TD's this fall.

I don't understand it either. He was a TR FR coming back from major knee surgery and behind a ****ty OLine..Im guessing Lane will start from day 1. Neal couldn't even beat out Lane last year so I'm guessing there's little chance he does this year.jmo