Dayton staying local made more since regarding revenue purposes...As well as avoiding a 4th potential Tennessee/Florida match up. BYU was just a poor selection on the part of the committee. Green bay deserved that bid.
Based off the bracket, what do think the main reason was that we have to play the "play-in" game with Iowa?
You think that's where they placed us at from the beginning? OR did we somehow slide down because of the process?
Dayton, BYU, confused the crap out of me.
I live in Dayton, and the arena is sold out for the play in games regardless of the teams. That said, it's an NCAA rule that you cannot play in your home arena in the NCAA tourney.
IMO, Dayton getting in along with UT's losses to A&M, and UTEP caused us problems.
Based off the bracket, what do think the main reason was that we have to play the "play-in" game with Iowa?
You think that's where they placed us at from the beginning? OR did we somehow slide down because of the process?
Dayton, BYU, confused the crap out of me.
And we were better at the end of the season? We thumped 5 teams with a combined record of 21 games under .500
Would you have preferred to lose to some of them?
Here's the problem. Martin was pretty much dead in the water after the 2nd A&M loss, but since then the team has crushed everybody except for UF. At this point it's pretty obvious that many on here would have preferred not playing well down the stretch, so really it's a no-win situation.
I live in Dayton, and the arena is sold out for the play in games regardless of the teams. That said, it's an NCAA rule that you cannot play in your home arena in the NCAA tourney.
IMO, Dayton getting in along with UT's losses to A&M, and UTEP caused us problems.
I live in Dayton, and the arena is sold out for the play in games regardless of the teams. That said, it's an NCAA rule that you cannot play in your home arena in the NCAA tourney.
IMO, Dayton getting in along with UT's losses to A&M, and UTEP caused us problems.