Without having seen Stanton play, I'd say no to your Golden to the two question. I said it on here yesterday - Despite his weaknesses, Golden is this team's point guard, and for good reason. If we have a serviceable backup in Washpun, Landry or Stanton, you may see Golden play the two in certain situations, but I don't see it working against bigger teams like we've seen the last two games. Golden's size, IMO, dictates that he plays the point in most situations, and I don't see any of the other three options next taking the starting job. I get the feeling Cuonzo isn't concerned with finding a starting PG...finding a good backup is the focus. He seems to have confidence in Trae and thinks he'll continue to grow his game.
I think you could use Stokes or Maymon at three in certain situations, but you'd be better served playing them at their natural positions. You'd be sacrificing one of your greatest strengths and would likely see less production at the 3 and 4 as a result. The wing will be the biggest area of concern next year, though. We're losing a lot of experience and talent in Tatum and Woolridge. Both are all around good players, and you're counting on some combination of Richardson, McRae, McBee, Edwards, and Chievous to collectively replace that production. It's a question mark for sure.
