Agreed on your thoughts about the Maui Invitational, lawvol. I said this on another thread, but if we could get a win against a non-Chaminade team and finish sixth or higher, that would be a good attainable goal for this group, especially given we're the seventh-best team in this thing on paper. A seventh place finish and a victory over Chaminade wouldn't be the end of the world, but it would suggest that perhaps things will go a little bit slower than people have started hoping after the UNCG game. I still say this is a pretty good team by the end of the year, it just may not come together in time to save anything but an NIT berth.
I think duke has more ability to just positively fill it up. But I also haven't seen Memphis as much.
Might be ACC bias from me.
If we don't it means we lost to chaminade.
UT is a better team than UCLA and Chaminade. I've only watched the UNCG game, and frankly, you can't tell much about CCM and the Vols from that game, except he's going to grind it out and limit possessions.
I don't think UT matchs up well against the bigs of Duke. Golden may be the best back court player in that game, but someone else will have to step up the scoring or Duke can just throw a fresh Dawson, Curry or Rivers at Golden all night.
UT matches up better with Michigan. If UT can limit offensive rebounds for Michigan and capitalize on the glass at the other end, it's a winnable game. UT's defense will give the Michigan shooters fits, and most of the Vols probably have the Michigan game from March fresh in their minds. They'll know what to expect, but the same can't be said for Michigan with the coaching change at UT.
I'll save myself the grief of posting the Memphis-UT possible Maui matchup.
The SEC is going to be tough this year. A legit Final Four team in Kentucky, 3 more sweet sixteen teams in Bama, Florida and Vandy, and two or three sneaky tourney teams in Akry, Ole Miss and UGA. CCM is going to need to make hay in his OOC schedule to keep from having to sweep the SEC tourney for an appearance in March.
Nice read. If we lose to Duke, I'd be willing to bet we are playing Memphis. Beilein will eat Pastners lunch and an undisciplined team like that will get very frustrated in the 1-3-1. I didn't see that much good ball movement or set plays in the Belmont game. They relied on turning them over and scoring in fast breaks. I don't see Michigan turning it over like that and think they win this one.
I'll give the counter-point to that argument:
Michigan actually has less upperclassmen than Memphis, which not a lot of teams can claim. Memphis will actually be a more experienced team.
The 1-3-1 is not a good defense to play against the Tigers because of Joe Jackson's ability to penetrate and dish to the post or to an open shooter.
Michigan is also weak on the boards (the 1-3-1 is mostly to blame), which was the glaring hole in Memphis' game vs. Belmont. Also, Beilein (sp?) basically utilized a 6-7 man rotation last year. If Memphis starts to force TOs like they did against a very experienced and disciplined team in Belmont, Michigan will get gassed. Memphis may be the most well conditioned team in the Nation this year, and will have too many weapons for Michigan to match up with.
I'd be willing to bet that Memphis would really, really struggle against the 1-3-1. Your all's beatin michigan would revolve around killing them on the offensive glass and getting out in transition. If its a halfcourt game, you all will lose.