Deserves some attention from Kurrie. Lady Vols need a positive change!
No one pays attention to him that man knows nothing who fires a coach who averages a 25 game win but I believe we need to give her at least this year to get us back in the right direction and two transfer now days is nothing
100%. That article is bull from someone who don't know squat about what's going on and to get the haters stirred up on this board.
100%. That article is bull from someone who don't know squat about what's going on and to get the haters stirred up on this board.
What is a "paper?"John Adams is a self righteous old fart. He writes an article stirring up animosity toward Serrano. Serrano quits, so he starts feeling his oats elsewhere. Someone should have neutered him a long time ago.
When he retires, the KNS will be a much better paper. At this point, it can't no nowhere but up.
His job is to write columns--and he recognizes, like most everyone who knows anything about sports, that Warlick is a bad coach who needs to be replaced. It has nothing to do with "hating."
His job is to write columns--and he recognizes, like most everyone who knows anything about sports, that Warlick is a bad coach who needs to be replaced. It has nothing to do with "hating."
John Adams wants this program to be what it was, not where it was presently heading. I have met the man...He strikes me as someone who is going to say what is needed to get change.
And,,, IT IS time for good news and good happenings to be publicly associated with the Lady Vol program.
That's a load of hot crap. Adams writes to stir the masses and it is rarely for anything "good". He gets to write more when things are going wrong, not right. If he calls for a firing that happens, it just feeds his stinking ego. I have more regard for the gum stuck to the bottom of my shoe. He needs to take a long walk off a short pier into shark infested waters. If there is a species of shark that can stomach him.
His job is to write columns--and he recognizes, like most everyone who knows anything about sports, that Warlick is a bad coach who needs to be replaced. It has nothing to do with "hating."
Any articles no matter how slight that sheds a light on the dismal job performance of CHW her fans come out to protest and attack the messenger. It's kind of funny and delusional, too. epper:
I just disagree with the part where he says that Warlick may be coaching for her job next season. IMO Warlick is coaching for her job now. I think she realizes it. How the team looks and plays next February and March is essentially being determined now in the off season. It's not the pieces that are missing; it's the whole.
"Warlick has averaged 25.6 victories in her five seasons since taking over the program that Pat Summitt built into a national powerhouse. But she has won successively fewer games in each of the past three seasons, going from 30 wins to 22 to 20. And the past two teams havent come close to consistently playing up to their potential.
Moreover, players on the past two teams often looked as though they didnt enjoy playing with one another. A coach cant make everybody like one another. But a coach must help create team chemistry thats conducive to success. She also must hold all players to certain standards on and off the floor.
The way this team has performed on the court makes me wonder whats going on with it off the floor. More specifically, it makes me wonder about team discipline and whether Warlick is a strong enough leader to advance this program any further."
'Nuff Said!