Well I would agree with Volunle2 that it was a gritty performance by the team when they realized they were about to lose to a much less athletic 11 seed. The only problem is poor coaching let them get that far behind, and then the young women's pride won inspite of the poor head coach we have. We should have easily beat that team by double digits. So Amb3096 I do not think anything Holly has to say will help this team at all.
CHW got out coached and almost beaten by a first year coach with far inferior talent, home court or not. The other coach look professional, and represented her school well. CHW looked like she should be selling cotton candy at the circus in that rediculous shirt she was wearing. It was an embarrassment to the University wearing that. She looked like a clown instead of the head coach of what used to be the best womens basketball program in the country.
Now we are just a shell of that great program. Someone posted that if we played UCONN and lost by 35 that was okay with a depleted roster, is that what we have come to under CHW. Did anyone of us fans EVER think that we stood no chance of winning a game when CPS was here? Heck, if Pat only had 4 players we still believed she would figure out a box defense or triangle and 1 and beat whoever we played that night. The best, and by far and away best, prospect in the state of Tennessee is going to UCONN next year to play for CGA. We lose games on the road we never lost before, like UTC USCjr. Next year the losses will start to happen at TBA. IT WILL BE A SLOW DESENT INTO OBLIVION. Players do not play all out all the time with full effort, recruiting starts to drop off, you lose games you never lost before, before you know it you are a doormat. If you do not believe me read that last sentance and think Tennessee football for the last 2 years of CPF coaching tenure followed by CLK, and CDD. Under Dooley we lost to KY and VANDY.