That is not what it means; if it was, I would be on your side. I copied a response from an earlier post below. And for the record - for some of you who claim the other teams have not earned the right to keep the name because only the basketball team has a national championship: they EARNED the right by hard work, representing the university, giving their best for their sport. If only being the very best in the nation is the only thing that counts, then some (MOST) of you would be considered worthless and unimportant...after all if you aren't the very top, then hard work, effort, ability, honor, etc. must mean nothing.
Originally Posted by BowlBrother85
I don't agree with it being sexist but it is a very old and southern tradition. I guess I'm surprised how much people seem to care about this? Is it really that big a deal?
Response:
Sort of think of it in reverse. For a woman to be equal to a man; she does not have to BE a man. Work on that long enough and one could conclude that requiring the Lady Vols to be Vols is what is sexist...like requiring a woman to be a man to be equal.
Lady Vols is a name the women at UT chose for themselves and earned. DNA makes a woman; character and class make a lady.
If the teams choose not to be called Lady Vols, I have no trouble with that decision. Obviously, in at least some areas, it is felt important to be known as a Lady Vol, or the basketball team would not have been 'allowed' to keep the name. What I have trouble with is some johhny come lately athletic directer, with no UT background, arbitrarily forcing that decision on numerous current athletes - as well as on previous athletes from the Lady Vol program.