I love PS--but Geno was and is a better coach. That's just a fact. PS made a lot of hay in the early years of women's basketball--and that doesn't take anything away from her ENORMOUS accomplishments and ENORMOUS contributions to the growth of women's basketball. Others always come along...If PS had started coaching the same year that Geno did--and I have to check to see how much later he started--we wouldn't have 8 titles. I noticed how well coached Ct. was very early on, before he had good players. If you know basketball it is easy to see which teams are well coached and which are not: well coached teams do not make a lot of the mistakes. It was/is the same with McGraw: For a long time she did not have much talent--but ND was competitive because it was well coached, and now ND gets talent. I recall the UT-Ct. championship game when Taurasi was a senior. Other than Taurasi, Ct. had a very young team. UT had Lawson and a good forward whose name I've forgottten, a veteran team. Geno beat us in the title game. Telling.
Geno coaches like PS AND is a much better offensive coach. This has been true from the start. I have thought for 15 years that, first PS & staff, and now Warlick & Staff, would recognize this--but they don't, as our offensive execution is still terrible. Do you see Ct. on offense? The players always know what they are doing. They are an excellent passing team while our passing has been somewhere between average and bad for 20 years.
I don't say all this because I like Ct. I don't like Ct. I have been complaining about our mediocre coaching for one simple reason: Because I didn't want to see happen what happened last night--and which I KNEW would happen: geno passes PS for the most titles. I didn't want it to happen--but you could see it coming because the two programs have been moving in opposite directions for years. The truth is, UT has been struggling--by our standards-- for a LONG time. PS coached too long and the law of diminishing returns/burnout kicked in, big-time. Anybody who thinks that someone coaches as well in years, say, 25-32 as they did in years, say, 5-15 knows nothing about coaching.
There was nothing to be done about it. PS was/is a legend, and she was going to coach as long as she wanted: She was the Joe Paterno of women's basketball--and Paterno coached WAY, WAY, too long. Penn. State was a national power during the first 20 years of Paterno career--and almost never better than mediocre the last 20 years of his reign. Sound familiar? UT has been better than mediocre--but not by much. We've been going through a long transition period and will continue to go through it until we get a first-rate coach and staff. I'm not really knocking Warlick--she spent almost her entire career (roughly 30 years!) as an assistant/friend of Pat. It is very hard to suddenly become a good head coach when you've been an assistant for that long--doesn't happen, and it is not happening for UT. We will need to get our act together if we want to be a power program again. Warlick has actually improved the recruiting, but that's not what I worry about.