Shelbyville Golden Eaglettes

[BruinVol]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

and that is the sad part

You don't expect your high school sports team to have a degree of success on the playing fields?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

[T-TownVol]

Originally Posted by BruinVol

You don't expect your high school sports team to have a degree of success on the playing fields?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

open ended question there big guy........have you changed the conversation from wins and loses........that is not the purpose of high school sports never has been never should be

[BruinVol]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

open ended question there big guy........have you changed the conversation from wins and loses........that is not the purpose of high school sports never has been never should be

A h.s. coach must run a clean program that the community is proud of both on and off the field. If they don't have both the on and off the field success they should be relieved of their duties. Yes that includes wins and loses and doesn't include those green participation ribbons that you seem to covet.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

[T-TownVol]

Originally Posted by BruinVol

A h.s. coach must run a clean program that the community is proud of both on and off the field. If they don't have both the on and off the field success they should be relieved of their duties. Yes that includes wins and loses and doesn't include those green participation ribbons that you seem to covet.Posted via VolNation Mobile

weak sauce Skippy

[shelbyvillevol]

Obviously you are a mentor to the kids you coach when you are dealing with HS kids, but if you're not coaching with the ultimate goal of winning, you're not much of a coach, imo.

[T-TownVol]

Originally Posted by shelbyvillevol

Obviously you are a mentor to the kids you coach when you are dealing with HS kids, but if you're not coaching with the ultimate goal of winning, you're not much of a coach, imo.

where did I say that winning is not A goal

[JoseDaMofo]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

where did I say that winning is not A goal

You're not saying much of anything worthwhile. That's the point.

HS coaches in plenty of places are gauged by their win/loss ratio. How is that a bad thing?

Outstanding students and a winning product on the field are not mutually exclusive like you are implying.

[T-TownVol]

Originally Posted by JoseDaMofo

You're not saying much of anything worthwhile. That's the point.

HS coaches in plenty of places are gauged by their win/loss ratio. How is that a bad thing?

Outstanding students and a winning product on the field are not mutually exclusive like you are implying.

so, now we have a mind reader in the thread, welcome....the point is that a good coach is both and should not be judged meerly by wins and loses......the people that understand the importance of the building young adults over wins are the ones that do our kids the best service....the parents that place all the value on wins are what is wrong with high school athletics.......thanks for playing

[BruinVol]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

so, now we have a mind reader in the thread, welcome....the point is that a good coach is both and should not be judged meerly by wins and loses......the people that understand the importance of the building young adults over wins are the ones that do our kids the best service....the parents that place all the value on wins are what is wrong with high school athletics.......thanks for playing

There hasn't been one poster in this thread say wins and loses are the only thing a high school coach should be judged by. The fact is there had been one poster that said repeatedly that wins and losses being considered when judging a high coach "is sad". The only thing that's sad is now you are changing your stance and admitting that winning games is more important than just getting that little green ribbon that means "thanks for playing".
Posted via VolNation Mobile

[T-TownVol]

Originally Posted by BruinVol

There hasn't been one poster in this thread say wins and loses are the only thing a high school coach should be judged by. The fact is there had been one poster that said repeatedly that wins and losses being considered when judging a high coach "is sad". The only thing that's sad is now you are changing your stance and admitting that winning games is more important than just getting that little green ribbon that means "thanks for playing".
Posted via VolNation Mobile

maybe you should not post after 10 pm......reading comprehension goes WAAAY down......you guys are far to easy to troll.....I'm done

[BruinVol]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

sad statement of the condition of HIGH SCHOOL sports

My reading comprehension tells me that at 1:07pm you felt it was sad that a high school coach be concerned with wins and loses.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

[BruinVol]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

and that is the sad part

My reading comprehension tells me that at 1:13pm you still thought it was sad that a coach care about winning and losing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

[BruinVol]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

the point is that a good coach is both and should not be judged meerly by wins and loses......

My reading comprehension tells me now at 7:50pm you now are coming around to reality that wins and loses do figure into judging a coach along with off the field issues which every poster in this thread has been stating all along.


What changed throughout the day?


Did you find out that those "thanks for playing" awards that you received as a kid for finishing last in little league were worthless?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

[T-TownVol]

thanks for proving my easy to troll point.....have a great day

[EricBerryistheMan]

Originally Posted by WillieGault

I have kept up with girls basketball since the 70's and I did notice that Shelbyville has really fallen off in the last couple of years. What's going on down there? I know that when Insell was there, they would get players from all over to come there. What's up?

They stopped cheating.