VolNation

 Users online now! 142            Home   Blog   VN Mobile   Store   Arcade   Contact Us    


About this Page -- This is a discussion on How much of an advantage does todays athlete gain...... within the forum Sports Forum. from what we have learned through nutrition, muscle supliments, weight training? Do you think say (Kareem abdul jabbar)would have been ...

Go Back   VolNation > Other Forums > Sports Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2008, 01:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
FLOPTIMIST
 
Fine Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 17,970
How much of an advantage does todays athlete gain.....

from what we have learned through nutrition, muscle supliments, weight training?

Do you think say (Kareem abdul jabbar)would have been any better with todays knowledge?
Fine Vol is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Football Jones
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,691
He could have had laser eye surgery.
allvol123 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
I love it when ya call me
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,138
given that the same info and technology would have been available to both sides, I don't think it would have made a tremendous impact on his overall game.

He might have found some supplement to keep him from being such a financial idiot, however.
BigPapaVol is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
FLOPTIMIST
 
Fine Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 17,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol View Post
given that the same info and technology would have been available to both sides, I don't think it would have made a tremendous impact on his overall game.

He might have found some supplement to keep him from being such a financial idiot, however.
Fine Vol is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Football Jones
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,691
But seriously, the competitors are competing against guys that have the same access to nutrition, supplements, weight training etc...as they do. So it is not as if they have an easier road to winning.
allvol123 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 08:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,601
I think football players would have more of an edge compared to years before.
__________________
from LawGator "the point is that your team responded very well to adversity against LSU while my beloved Gators folded up like a cheap tent.
VolBeef88 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 09:05 PM   #7 (permalink)
I love it when ya call me
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by VolBeef88 View Post
I think football players would have more of an edge compared to years before.
but again, so do all of the guys they're playing against.
BigPapaVol is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 09:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol View Post
but again, so do all of the guys they're playing against.
I took the question to mean would they be better than they were as an individual. And yes all players would have the same access.
__________________
from LawGator "the point is that your team responded very well to adversity against LSU while my beloved Gators folded up like a cheap tent.
VolBeef88 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 11:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
FLOPTIMIST
 
Fine Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 17,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by VolBeef88 View Post
I took the question to mean would they be better than they were as an individual. And yes all players would have the same access.
Fine Vol is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 04:07 AM   #10 (permalink)
Dr. Vinny Boombotz
 
Business's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Stankonia
Posts: 3,769
I'm with BigPapa. Given that the supplement was avaliable to all in a sport, then it would cancel each other out.

Baseball for example. A hitter could hit it longer but they were (or are) facing more frequently pitchers that can get it up over 91-93 and ones that could do that are now throwing 97-99.

Trust me there is a significant difference between 93 and 99 when in the box.
Business is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 07:54 AM   #11 (permalink)
I love it when ya call me
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Business View Post
Trust me there is a significant difference between 93 and 99 when in the box.
that extra foot or foot and a half is a very big deal
BigPapaVol is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 06:32 PM   #12 (permalink)
2008: Change...
 
Rasputin_Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,397
Wilt Chamberlain with todays technology would have been a track and field star as well as a great basketball player. But then again, as i think about it, the trend nowadays is for us to get guys and make them "specialists" at a certain position or sport and not as well rounded.

Jim Brown would make the likes of Ray Lewis and Brian Urlacher his b^tch if he would have been born in 1980 or later...
__________________
“He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire.”

Winston Churchill
Rasputin_Vol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 06:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
2008: Change...
 
Rasputin_Vol's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,397
Another example of an athlete that might have been limited had he been born in this era is Babe Ruth. had he come up in the Red Sox organization now, he would have been a pitcher and probably would have ended up never swinging a bat because of today's focus on getting guys to focus in one area of a sport.
__________________
“He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire.”

Winston Churchill
Rasputin_Vol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 06:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
Holdin' up a lamp post
 
milohimself's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 21,101
I'm with the "The competitiveness is the same, the individuals are better" school of thought. I personally know people who train naturally with nothing more than a good work ethic and diet. They plateau, then start some basic supplements available to you and I at GNC or VitaminWorld or wherever, and then manage to lose another 3-4% body fat and gain another 20-30 pounds of muscle.

The playing field is still level as it has ever been, but there's no way that the athletes of yesteryear are even close to being the same physical specimens that we have today.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dude
Okay, I see. Are you in college, pothead.
milohimself is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 02:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
Vote Pearl in '08!
 
crazyguy's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 5,808
You could think about it two ways.
1. The better athlete would be much better than his peers and increase the gap with better weight training, nutrition, supplements etc.
2. The marginal athlete would be better because of the same reasons.
All in all I'd say it's a wash.
crazyguy is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23