PS has been a spotty coach for the last decade or so. I love her, truly, but her only true genius is at getting other teams to play less well than the Vols--she's a master of winning big games ugly. Great: Show me you can take a team of AAs and actually play a GOOD game once in a while! The Rutgers game was classic UT/PS: The teams shoots 29 percent, plays like the keystone kops in the second half and still wins! But it may be catching up with the LVs. Hornbuckle, a very talented player and athlete, has been an absolute NO-SHOW for three weeks. Early this year, she finally seemed to get that she needed to be more assertive offensively--take the ball to the hoop, shoot more, score more! Then, recently, she has done nothing. Bobbitt? She had ZERO assists against duke (yet of course the LVs still won). She's gutsy in the clutch, will take the 3 when needed, a fairly good defensive player--but she's not a very good point guard because she doesn't distribute the ball well.
UT's real problem is that PS doesn't no how to coach team offense--never has, really. Many of her players NEVER develop offensively; and others actually lose offensive confidence over time and REGRESS, because she's always harping on defense and rebounding. Her teams NEVER pass the ball well, UT's ball movement is mediocre at best and her teams rarely shoot well as a team.
She can win when she gets great players like Parker, but relies on them too much because she can't coach team offense. Watch other teams move and pass the ball and then watch UT. She hasn't had a good center in a decade--none of them EVER develop an offensive game. Robinson, Fluker, Anosike: all come in with potential and then...didly. Anosike has been an asset with her defense and rebounding--the two things that ps has obsessed over for 30 years but is clueless with the basketball.
I've watched the LV's for forever, but I'm down on PS because she does not know how to coach team offense--and because despite all the top players she gets, her teams rarely really play well together, I don't care how many titles she has. And let's be honest: She's got to be a more than a little burnt out by now! Now watch: She'll go out and win another title by winning four straight ncaa games in which her teams shoot 30 percent, averages 8 assists/16 turnovers, but prevail at the buzzer in all of them in ugly defensive struggles. That's her formula--and yea, it's worked--but it's an odd one for a team that's supposed to be loaded with talent every year.
That's my beef--play up to your talent. The LVs don't. She's //supposedly// got five/six HS AAs on the team, so why must the LVs depend on Parker to get 30 a game!! Better, if you've got talent, to have three or four players scoring 12 to 15--you're more balanced! You're also vulnerable to good teams when your offense consists of: Throw the ball to Parker and hope she can do something against a double-team. That's essentially the LV offense with Summitt--despite having a team full of supposed stars! This is why geno/ct has had success against ps over the years--he can coach team offense. Even when he had Taurasi, he was not all that dependent on her to score--she got everyone else involved. PS cannot teach her teams to do that.