 | |
11-09-2007, 02:57 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Negavol Savant Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Russellville, AR
Posts: 11,125
| This Says It All... Fulmer's critics point to the fact that he's just 11-11 in his past 22 SEC games. They point out that he's just 10-17 in his past 27 games against nationally ranked teams. They cite his 2-6 postseason record (SEC championship and bowl games) since the beginning of the 2000 season. They point to nine losses against unranked teams in that same span. The 59-20 loss to Florida was Tennessee's worst beating in more than a quarter century, and then to follow that up a month later with a 41-17 meltdown at Alabama (with Nick Saban standing on the other sideline) made Fulmer an easy target. |
| |
11-09-2007, 02:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | It's GREAT to be a VOL! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Roswell. GA
Posts: 3,625
|
__________________ It's not always possible to know how deep the water is before diving in. |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:00 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | C.J. Black owes me $50... Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Hugging Harold Reynolds...
Posts: 8,948
| Not sure if these numbers are correct, but it is pretty damning if true... ESPN.com - NCAA - Tennessee Volunteers Message Board Quote:
Since 2002 the Vols are 48-24 overall up to the LA-Lafayette game.
During that time the combined record of the opponents we've beaten is 253-300. This means the average yearly record of the opponents we've beaten is 5-6.
The combined record of the opponents we've lost to is 220-73. This means the average yearly record of the opponents we've lost to is 9-3.
These two sets of numbers indicate that we beat the poor and mediocre teams while being trounced by the better teams. I remember a time when we were one of the better teams doing the trouncing.
Our record vs. Non-Conference opponents is 19-7 during this span, counting bowl games. Those opponents have a combined record of 157-147. Because win and loss numbers can be skewed by one upset either way, I also looked at the number of non-conference teams we've played each year with a winning and losing record overall. Counting bowl games, 12 of our 26 non-conference opponents have posted winning seasons at the end of the year while 14 did not. Remove the bowl games and the number of teams that we played out of conference that posted winning records dropped to nine of twenty-six. We have built a house of cards on the backs of mediocre teams.
Breaking down the non-conference opponents by conference, 3 from the Mountain West, 3 from the Sunbelt, 3 from the Big East, 3 from the ACC, 2 from the WAC, 6 from Conference USA, 2 Independent, 1 Big Twelve, 2 Pac-10, and 1 Big Ten. Of those, 4 were bowl games represented by the ACC in two, the Big 12 in one, and the Big 10 in one. Not counting bowls 19 of the 26 opponents have come from non-major conferences.
Against those who finished in the Final Top 25 at the end of the season, Tennessee is 6-18 during this span.
Against those who were in the Top 25 at the time we played them, we are 8-16 during this span.
Our record versus bowl teams during this span is 14-19.
We've been upset by a lower ranked or unranked team 10 times during this span when we've been ranked. Six of those losses came when we were ranked and our opponent was unranked.
On the flip side, we've upset a higher ranked team 7 times.
Our record versus Top Ten teams is 3-11.
Our record against BCS Bowl teams is 4-13.
This season alone we're 2-2 against ranked teams, with two of those losses being blow-outs. We nearly gave away the South Carolina game with one of the coaching staff's infamous "3 runs and a punt offense and give them anything they want in front of you but don't let them get behind you defense". And we were blown out against 'Bama.
| |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:01 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Negavol Savant Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Russellville, AR
Posts: 11,125
| |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:08 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Make em Gobble Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Dover, TN
Posts: 5,321
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rexvol | Who should we get? Russel Athletic or Jordache, who gives a flying f--k
__________________ Greet the day and make em Gobble! |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:10 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | son piratas, no soldados Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: texas
Posts: 2,736
| aTm is not getting rid of Adidas. He was wrong on that one, not sure about the rest of it.
__________________ " Its Division I football! Its the BIG XII!
for the times ... they are a changin'- Bob Dylan |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:14 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Negavol Savant Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Russellville, AR
Posts: 11,125
| personally Im hoping for British Knights |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:14 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Make em Gobble Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Dover, TN
Posts: 5,321
| L.A. Gear man...
__________________ Greet the day and make em Gobble! |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:15 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | FLOPTIMIST Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 19,276
| Quote:
Originally Posted by VolfanMike Who should we get? Russel Athletic or Jordache, who gives a flying f--k | British Knights |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:16 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Valid Victorian Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,793
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rexvol | If Michigan was an Adidas school they might have a point. |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:16 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Football Jones Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,111
| Kangaroooss |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:17 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | FLOPTIMIST Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 19,276
| South pole |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:17 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | C.J. Black owes me $50... Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Hugging Harold Reynolds...
Posts: 8,948
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rexvol personally Im hoping for British Knights | Brooks... |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:17 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | son piratas, no soldados Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: texas
Posts: 2,736
| new balance?
sketchers?
__________________ " Its Division I football! Its the BIG XII!
for the times ... they are a changin'- Bob Dylan |
| |
11-09-2007, 03:18 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | FLOPTIMIST Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 19,276
| Fat Head |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |