2089 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on Make Sure You Pay Those Red Light And Speed Camera Tickets.. within the forum The Pub. Las Cruces, New Mexico is threatening to cut off water, gas and sewer service over unpaid red light and speed ...

Go Back   VolNation > Off Topic Forums > The Pub

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2012, 08:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
Time To Grind
 
myrobbins7's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 21,451
Likes: 302
Make Sure You Pay Those Red Light And Speed Camera Tickets.

Las Cruces, New Mexico is threatening to cut off water, gas and sewer service over unpaid red light and speed camera tickets.

New Mexico: City Shuts Off Water, Sewer for Photo Ticket Nonpayment
myrobbins7 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 931
What a load of crap. The politicians involved in that should be thrown in jail for the rest of their lives or executed in the town square.
davethevol is online now  
VN Likes: 1
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:15 AM   #3 (permalink)
Dancing with the Ball
 
LittleCat's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lexington, Kentucky.
Posts: 7,965
Likes: 520
That's just stupid. They should be kicked out for that.
LittleCat is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:21 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TennVOLS93's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: middle of vol land
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 172
Yes this makes total sense. Let's cut off somebody's valuable resources when there is most likely children in the house over a retarded robot ticket. Excellent idea. I have gotten one of these before in knoxville. Paid the it just so the freaking letters would stop. It really would not bother me that much if it was a real cop (someone who is working and doing their job appropriately) instead of a lousy piece of technology.
TennVOLS93 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:28 AM   #5 (permalink)
VN conasewer
 
utvolpj's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start
Posts: 52,514
Likes: 7,908
anyone really surprised? Traffic enforcement is little more than revenue collection

Quote:
Originally Posted by TennVOLS93 View Post
Yes this makes total sense. Let's cut off somebody's valuable resources when there is most likely children in the house over a retarded robot ticket. Excellent idea. I have gotten one of these before in knoxville. Paid the it just so the freaking letters would stop. It really would not bother me that much if it was a real cop (someone who is working and doing their job appropriately) instead of a lousy piece of technology.
is this really the place for a "think about the kids" argument?
utvolpj is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:32 AM   #6 (permalink)
MeatFlap flaPperFat'
 
Cyclopskiller's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: "The port of John"
Posts: 7,379
Likes: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by utvolpj View Post
anyone really surprised? Traffic enforcement is little more than revenue collection



is this really the place for a "think about the kids" argument?


Uh... Why wouldn't you think about the kids?
__________________
Making lemonade!!!
Cyclopskiller is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:33 AM   #7 (permalink)
VN conasewer
 
utvolpj's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start
Posts: 52,514
Likes: 7,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclopskiller View Post
[/B]

Uh... Why wouldn't you think about the kids?
because you're blaming the sity/state for the negligence of the parent. If you're going to make anyone the bad guy it should be the idiot behind the wheel

if that argument is valid then I assume you are both for fully funding all entitlement programs since kids might be affected
utvolpj is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:36 AM   #8 (permalink)
I don't think so!
 
YorkVol's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: York Pa
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 2,053
Don't pay it, wait for them to shut off your utilities, then sue them for reckless endangerment.
YorkVol is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by utvolpj View Post
because you're blaming the sity/state for the negligence of the parent. If you're going to make anyone the bad guy it should be the idiot behind the wheel

if that argument is valid then I assume you are both for fully funding all entitlement programs since kids might be affected
Normally that would probably be the case, but in the US we should still be able to face our accusers in court, and these cameras have been legally set up to avoid that issue by making these non-moving violations. No one should pay these tickets as it is literally highway robbery by our elected officials.
davethevol is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:39 AM   #10 (permalink)
VN conasewer
 
utvolpj's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start
Posts: 52,514
Likes: 7,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by davethevol View Post
Normally that would probably be the case, but in the US we should still be able to face our accusers in court, and these cameras have been legally set up to avoid that issue by making these non-moving violations. No one should pay these tickets as it is literally highway robbery by our elected officials.
It's still the case. The city didn't make anyone drive and surely didn't make anyone run the light. I'm more in favor of these than I am hiring more cops to simply set up speed traps and to sit and watch red lights all day.

If you look at the actual tickets there's not really much to gain by "facing your accuser" anyway.
utvolpj is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:40 AM   #11 (permalink)
MeatFlap flaPperFat'
 
Cyclopskiller's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: "The port of John"
Posts: 7,379
Likes: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by utvolpj View Post
because you're blaming the sity/state for the negligence of the parent. If you're going to make anyone the bad guy it should be the idiot behind the wheel

if that argument is valid then I assume you are both for fully funding all entitlement programs since kids might be affected
Says the police of this site. Smh
__________________
Making lemonade!!!
Cyclopskiller is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:42 AM   #12 (permalink)
MeatFlap flaPperFat'
 
Cyclopskiller's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: "The port of John"
Posts: 7,379
Likes: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by utvolpj View Post
It's still the case. The city didn't make anyone drive and surely didn't make anyone run the light. I'm more in favor of these than I am hiring more cops to simply set up speed traps and to sit and watch red lights all day.

If you look at the actual tickets there's not really much to gain by "facing your accuser" anyway.
Uses the self check-out lane..
__________________
Making lemonade!!!
Cyclopskiller is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:44 AM   #13 (permalink)
VN conasewer
 
utvolpj's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start
Posts: 52,514
Likes: 7,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclopskiller View Post
Says the police of this site. Smh
and just like driving- no one is forcing you to post
utvolpj is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 08:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
Dawn of a New Day
 
IBlvNTmWrk's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,942
Likes: 643
I tend to agree with PJ on this one. Cameras seem to be an economical means to monitor traffic patterns and issue violations for those who choose to run red lights, which btw endangers other drivers.

If you get a ticket for a driving violation, whether from an officer or caught on camera, what does it really matter if you in fact did commit the violation? In regards to cutting off someone's utilities, it seems to be an unfortunate step... but if the violator would pay the ticket then it wouldn't be an issue. In some ways I could agree with this as it seems to be an efficient means (i.e. less tax $ required) to collecting fines from those who are unwilling to pay.
IBlvNTmWrk is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 04-30-2012, 09:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
I don't think so!
 
YorkVol's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: York Pa
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 2,053
Dear City of _________,

Re: Red Light Ticket of (DATE)

I received your letter dated (DATE), and acknowledge moving through the intersection at the time and date stated. However, I cannot agree that this was unlawful as there was an ambulance approaching from behind me and I was obstructing its path of travel. Therefore, I cleared the intersection in order to allow it to proceed on its life saving mission. Consequently, I am not paying a fine for executing my civic responsibility and making way for a first responder.

As a character reference, please review your camera footage for the 100+ previous times that I've traveled through that particular intersection so you can verify that I have never run through the red light prior to this occasion. Also, feel free to check my driving record and you will see I have not had so much as a speeding ticket and only 1 parking violation in the past 20+ years.

Please desist in sending any more letters in this regard.

Sincerely,

Me,
Good Citizen of City of __________
YorkVol is online now  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27