Another THP Officer shows his true colors

[OrangeEmpire]

Originally Posted by OJ

Why does this story not surprise me in the least?

I dunno, why?

[rockytop9808]

Originally Posted by Cdywolfe

He may be but not as big of an ass as someone who gets drunk and drives 40 over the limit. Then evades the police when he gets caught doing it.

You're right, drunk driving and watching someone you're sworn to protect burn to death are exactly comparable.

Moron.

[Slydell]

I've noticed the drunk driver reference in this thread, obviously. I didn't see the original story when this happened. Was the determination of the driver being intoxicated made during the autopsy? If so, what was the level that was found?

[bluetickhound16]

Originally Posted by 9296potsguy

How about this. Both Victim and policeman made egregious errors in judgement. One lost his life and the other should definitely lose his job. There really should not be that much disagreement in this thread.

The difference is that the kid's egregious error might very well have cost other(s) THEIR lives. Dude was already TU by the time the officer made his egregious error. Bad judgement on the cops part? You bet, but his faulty decision making had no chance of costing somebody outside of the situation their life.

[Cdywolfe]

Originally Posted by rockytop9808

You're right, drunk driving and watching someone you're sworn to protect burn to death are exactly comparable.

Moron.

Originally Posted by bluetickhound16

The difference is that the kid's egregious error might very well have cost other(s) THEIR lives. Dude was already TU by the time the officer made his egregious error. Bad judgement on the cops part? You bet, but his faulty decision making had no chance of costing somebody outside of the situation their life.

Maybe one day rockytop will grow up and realize this.

I doubt it though

[bamacheats]

Originally Posted by bluetickhound16

The difference is that the kid's egregious error might very well have cost other(s) THEIR lives. Dude was already TU by the time the officer made his egregious error. Bad judgement on the cops part? You bet, but his faulty decision making had no chance of costing somebody outside of the situation their life.

This is the reason so many have lost respect for "law enforcement". This "reasoning" is beyond moronic and shows the tunnel vision that LE operate with. You justify the sociopathic actions of the officer by creating a mythical situation of this poor kid killing someone, as if this idiot cop actually was a hero and saved an innocent bystander.

[bamacheats]

Originally Posted by Cdywolfe

Maybe one day us dumbasses will grow up and realize we're not god.

I doubt it though

Fyp

[VolsFan4Ever-11]

If the moron hadn't been drunk driving and running from the cops, none of this would have happened.

[bamacheats]

Originally Posted by VolsFan4Ever-11

If the moron hadn't been drunk driving and running from the cops, none of this would have happened.

If the moron cop had stopped and pulled the kid from the wreck, the kid could be prosecuted for those actions. I don't believe the sentence for any of his actions is the death penalty.

[OsbourneBROS83]

[QUOTE=bamacheats;6338540]If the moron cop had stopped and pulled the kid from the wreck, the kid could be prosecuted for those actions. QUOTE]

Negative...the article states he died on impact. It is an unfortunate situation in any case. The family I am sure is heartbroken and the trooper was morally flawed and had some question of whether he would be accused of wrong doing I am sure. Also there is no need to blame the entire organization over one man's actions. And bfore anyone says its there duty to do proper background checks keep in mind that there are bad apples in any and every organization you can think of and no amount of background investigation could possibly prevent one from getting the job.

Prayers for the families.

[dembewbs]

[QUOTE=OsbourneBROS83;6338596]

Originally Posted by bamacheats

If the moron cop had stopped and pulled the kid from the wreck, the kid could be prosecuted for those actions. QUOTE]

Negative...the article states he died on impact. It is an unfortunate situation in any case. The family I am sure is heartbroken and the trooper was morally flawed and had some question of whether he would be accused of wrong doing I am sure. Also there is no need to blame the entire organization over one man's actions. And bfore anyone says its there duty to do proper background checks keep in mind that there are bad apples in any and every organization you can think of and no amount of background investigation could possibly prevent one from getting the job.

Prayers for the families.

good post...although bamacheats never understands ....ignorance is bliss....

[OsbourneBROS83]

[QUOTE=dembewbs;6338607]

Originally Posted by OsbourneBROS83

good post...although bamacheats never understands ....ignorance is bliss....

Sorry I cant focus on your post due to....

That ridiculous avatar...good lord

[bamacheats]

[QUOTE=OsbourneBROS83;6338596]

Originally Posted by bamacheats

If the moron cop had stopped and pulled the kid from the wreck, the kid could be prosecuted for those actions. QUOTE]

Negative...the article states he died on impact. It is an unfortunate situation in any case. The family I am sure is heartbroken and the trooper was morally flawed and had some question of whether he would be accused of wrong doing I am sure. Also there is no need to blame the entire organization over one man's actions. And bfore anyone says its there duty to do proper background checks keep in mind that there are bad apples in any and every organization you can think of and no amount of background investigation could possibly prevent one from getting the job.

Prayers for the families.

No need to blame an entire organization on one man's actions when there's a gigantic sample size. It's evidenced by posts made by LE. The way LE thinks is the problem. Something as obviously immoral as driving past a wreck is instantly sugarcoated by many LE with their myriad of "what ifs" and "he should've".

[Cdywolfe]

If you haven't had a discussion with bamacheats then go ahead and save yourself the time and don't.

He's a child and continues to prove it time and time again.

[OsbourneBROS83]

[QUOTE=bamacheats;6338642]

Originally Posted by OsbourneBROS83

No need to blame an entire organization on one man's actions when there's a gigantic sample size.

You are not familiar with statistical sample sizes huh? The 2 or 3 guys in here that may be part of an LE organization regardless of their opinion do not encompass a GIGANTIC sample size.

You are right though it was immoral thing to do by the THP trooper.