Highjacking nine eleven.

[VolsSportsFan]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

I do not beleive that you gave any indication, in that post, that you are anything but an Obama supporter. No, I have not read any other post from you. I am sorry that I took it wrong.

You thought I was an Obama supporter simply because I'm not crazy about the War on Terror? I wasn't aware that being pro-War on Terror was a conservative position.

Ron Paul ring a bell?

[vol_in_il]

Originally Posted by rekinhavoc

I won't forget no matter what they do.
Just like older Americans have not forgotten Pearl Harbor.

+1

[T-TownVol]

Originally Posted by VolsSportsFan

You thought I was an Obama supporter simply because I'm not crazy about the War on Terror? I wasn't aware that being pro-War on Terror was a conservative position.

Ron Paul ring a bell?

Well, we do not take an appology very well, now do we?
I was not the only one that thought that you were an Obama supporter. Maybe the "understanding" issue is not on my end.

[VolsSportsFan]

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

Well, we do not take an appology very well, now do we?
I was not the only one that thought that you were an Obama supporter. Maybe the "understanding" issue is not on my end.

Who else thought I was an Obama supporter? You are the only one who directly stated that Obama was my "Messiah".

Secondly, you stated "I do not beleive that you gave any indication, in that post, that you are anything but an Obama supporter." Which means you obviously gathered that ONLY on the fact that I implied certain Republicans used 9/11 to exploit, at least some aspects, of the War on Terror. Which is again why I ask when did being pro-War on Terror become an exclusively conservative stance? To jump to the conclusion you did pretty much shows you to be quite narrow minded and highly knee jerk.

Just because you "apologized" doesn't mean I'm going just let something you post pass.

[T-TownVol]

The explainations that you have given, SINCE the original post, make sence. I acknowledged that and you came back at me.
I will once again say, I took the original post in this thread WRONG. (by the way, post #8 called you out on it also) I guess that I just used a word that pushed you button when I used Messiah.
The "war on terror" is a direct talking point of the Dems.Being pro-war on terror is 100% a conservative stance. Your post did not explain your position, it just threw out "war on terror".
Now that I notice your posts, which until this started I did not even recognize your name, I see that you and I are not far apart on most things.
I will not respond to any of your posts again and once again, sorry for the misunderstanding.

[gsvol]

Originally Posted by vol_in_il

+1

And never forget this:



"Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do To Stop Them"

The environmental movement has cultivated a warm and fuzzy public image, but behind the smiley-face rhetoric of "sustainability" and "conservation" lies a dark agenda. The Greens aim to regulate your behavior, downsize your lifestyle, and invade the most intimate aspects of your personal life.

[gsvol]

Originally Posted by 615 Vol

Speaking of 9/11, National Geographic is showing this tonight at 9PM eastern time.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

Well did anyone watch it???

Turns out Obama's green jobs czar is a 'truther.'

Not surprising, nothing this wacko administration would do could be surprising.

Top ten most radical statements by Obama's science czar.

Would some politically correct obot tell me again why comparisons between Hitler and Obama aren't merited, even warrented??

Tick tock.

Originally Posted by T-TownVol

(by the way, post #8 called you out on it also)

Flamers usually fit one of these categories.

I notice he came here the same month I did, thanks for watching my back, I see no way you owed him any sort of apology no matter how much he got his drawers all atwitter.