1840 users online now!    CONTACT US | ADVERTISE | REGISTER       

About this Page -- This is a discussion on GM Exit Strategy. within the forum Politics. I was amused watching Robert Gibbs try to answer a question on Team Obama's exit strategy from GM. He ended ...

Go Back   VolNation > Off Topic Forums > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2009, 10:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 32,007
Likes: 1,473
GM Exit Strategy

I was amused watching Robert Gibbs try to answer a question on Team Obama's exit strategy from GM.

He ended up giving the Bush Iraq exit strategy answer: when the job is done.

He also couldn't answer what conditions would involve Team Obama exercising their ownership influence in GM decisions.

What goes around, comes around...
__________________
"Every American has the right to know when their government believes it has the right to kill them"

--Sen. Ron Wyden (D) Oregon
volinbham is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
I'm Your Huckleberry
 
Lexvol's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 21,634
Likes: 3,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by volinbham View Post
I was amused watching Robert Gibbs try to answer a question on Team Obama's exit strategy from GM.

He ended up giving the Bush Iraq exit strategy answer: when the job is done.

He also couldn't answer what conditions would involve Team Obama exercising their ownership influence in GM decisions.

What goes around, comes around...
That sounds more like a "rear entry" strategy rather than an exit plan.
Lexvol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Vol Mania 21's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 57,054
Likes: 0
gibbs is an idiot he proves it on a daily basis
Vol Mania 21 is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 32,007
Likes: 1,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexvol View Post
That sounds more like a "rear entry" strategy rather than an exit plan.


and they didn't even get dinner first...
__________________
"Every American has the right to know when their government believes it has the right to kill them"

--Sen. Ron Wyden (D) Oregon
volinbham is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:04 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 21,924
Likes: 0
with the pension obligations still intact there is no reason to think gm wont go bankrupt again. what worries me is if the union owns stock and that is how they are funding the pension obligations what happens if gm goes bankrupt again? won't the pension fund now be worth zero? we could see a situation where obama has to bail out gm and the unions twice with billions of $$$$. for this reason i really really hope the unions have to sell their gm stock after a certain amount of time to lock in that the pensions are finally funded. for one thing it's not appropriate for them to own gm in the first place. this is truly scary stuff. never did i think i'd see a president in the modern era in the pocket of the unions like this.
droski is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:04 AM   #6 (permalink)
Technical Difficulties
 
allvol123's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22,544
Likes: 2,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by volinbham View Post
I was amused watching Robert Gibbs try to answer a question on Team Obama's exit strategy from GM.

He ended up giving the Bush Iraq exit strategy answer: when the job is done.

He also couldn't answer what conditions would involve Team Obama exercising their ownership influence in GM decisions.

What goes around, comes around...
Funny comparing it to Iraq VBH. That is a good catch and quite funny.
allvol123 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 32,007
Likes: 1,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by droski View Post
with the pension obligations still intact there is no reason to think gm wont go bankrupt again. what worries me is if the union owns stock and that is how they are funding the pension obligations what happens if gm goes bankrupt again? won't the pension fund now be worth zero? we could see a situation where obama has to bail out gm and the unions twice with billions of $$$$. for this reason i really really hope the unions have to sell their gm stock after a certain amount of time to lock in that the pensions are finally funded. for one thing it's not appropriate for them to own gm in the first place. this is truly scary stuff. never did i think i'd see a president in the modern era in the pocket of the unions like this.
What about the conflict of interest for the Federal Government: owner, lender and regulator.
__________________
"Every American has the right to know when their government believes it has the right to kill them"

--Sen. Ron Wyden (D) Oregon
volinbham is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:08 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 21,924
Likes: 0
the government should be forced to sell their stock too.
droski is offline   Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 11:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
I'm Your Huckleberry
 
Lexvol's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 21,634
Likes: 3,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by droski View Post
with the pension obligations still intact there is no reason to think gm wont go bankrupt again. what worries me is if the union owns stock and that is how they are funding the pension obligations what happens if gm goes bankrupt again? won't the pension fund now be worth zero? we could see a situation where obama has to bail out gm and the unions twice with billions of $$$$. for this reason i really really hope the unions have to sell their gm stock after a certain amount of time to lock in that the pensions are finally funded. for one thing it's not appropriate for them to own gm in the first place. this is truly scary stuff. never did i think i'd see a president in the modern era in the pocket of the unions like this.
Or even worse what if they are beholden to the corporation under the guise of union support? It is a perfect partnership for things like the VAT plans.
Lexvol is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Old 06-02-2009, 02:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,455
Likes: 124
i wonder if the other car can sue gm and the government for anti-trust. the government can easily put laws or regulations that would hurt other car companies. hussein has no problems illegally taking over business, no reason he he'll not do this too.
joevol320 is offline  
Reply With Quote TOP
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27