VolNation

 Users online now! 1672            Home   Blog   VN Mobile   Store   Arcade   Contact Us    


About this Page -- This is a discussion on Nelson Mandela Found a Way to Completely Lose My Respect Page 3. within the forum Politics. Originally Posted by 615 Vol I would just like to add that not all poor people are lazy and a ...

Go Back   VolNation > Other Forums > The Pub > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2008, 10:05 AM   #31 (permalink)
say that one more time
 
KB5252's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ashland City,TN
Posts: 8,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by 615 Vol View Post
I would just like to add that not all poor people are lazy and a lot of wealthy people obtain their wealth off the poor.
If you mean by offering services the poor people need you would be correct. Please clarify so I understand your position.
KB5252 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:27 AM   #32 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 12,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
And you think only those without means are using Social Security, Medicare, and income security? I'm pretty sure those programs don't discriminate based on means.

I'm looking for a number that we spend annually on "lazy" people who make "poor choices" who end up poor and therefore just survive on government paychecks - you know, "welfare queens" and such. What's that total?
I think a big part of the problem is the "entitlement" mentality that we've created. You're right - we spend a huge % of total spending to provide entitlements based on belonging to some special class.

These entitlements don't go away. Instead, they grow and seep into a greater and greater portion of society. People now expect the government to be the back up for all their decisions and why not? Some politician will always tell you (us) it's not your (our) fault and introduce legislation to shift resources towards the "issue".
__________________
Who can take the country
Sprinkle it with change
Make everything fair when the wealth he rearranges
The Candy Man, the Candy man can

volinbham is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:28 AM   #33 (permalink)
Wave yo hands in the aiya
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
In regards to the bold, so that's what Jesus meant when he said, "Blessed are the poor, for they shall inherit the earth"?

And let me get this straight - b/c you feel Mandela hasn't properly acknowledged that the wealthy "earned" their means, you're going to completely disregard the notion that you should help out those who are starving. Because some poor people are "lazy" or have made "poor decisions," we should disregard the needs of them all?

Sounds like a pretty easy way to clear one's conscience of doing nothing.
do you really think Jesus was talking about the financially poor? If I recall, your father is/was a pastor, maybe you should ask him to help you with what that particular beatitude was saying.

There is no "you should help the starving." That is simply a trite maxim. While I agree that help be made available, it is not a moral responsibility. We are all here to fend for ourselves, except for those with physical or mental disabilities. I'm all for helping those folks at every turn.

I've never said we shouldn't help people, I'm just saying that Mandela's view toward pure wealth redistro, and make no mistake, that was exactly what he was talking about, is absolute garbage and is not the truism he proclaims it to be.

My parents grew up in sharecropping cotton farming families, 10 brothers and sisters each, poor as dirt, generally uneducated, but nobody cried for them. They put their noses down and worked for every little thing they could have. That mentality is absolutely missing in the Mandela approach to bettering the situation for the poor. As long as someone will show up with some assistance, it'll be alright. Call it harsh, but I'm much more about the lasting value in folks figuring out how to get there on their own, much like the give a man a fish....."

My conscience has no issues with helping since I do plenty through my church, but I don't buy this kind of drivel from socialists of Mandela's ilk. Again, he's trying to make this a moral responsibility that it just isn't.
BigPapaVol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:31 AM   #34 (permalink)
Wave yo hands in the aiya
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by 615 Vol View Post
I would just like to add that not all poor people are lazy and a lot of wealthy people obtain their wealth off the poor.
I'm not saying that all poor people are lazy. I'm saying the lazy are a substantial portion of the poor and I have no intention of supporting that problem.

The notion that the wealthy obtain their wealth from the poor is the most Marxist idea I have seen here and your not the first to float it.

Wonder why you didn't say that hordes are not poor because the wealthy take enormous risks with their capital and provide the vast majority of jobs in the world?
BigPapaVol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:32 AM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
VolDad's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
And you think only those without means are using Social Security, Medicare, and income security? I'm pretty sure those programs don't discriminate based on means.

I'm looking for a number that we spend annually on "lazy" people who make "poor choices" who end up poor and therefore just survive on government paychecks - you know, "welfare queens" and such. What's that total?
It is hard to say...since many of the programs you speak of are spread across multiple categories (i.e. income security ,which you mention above, includes food stamps and welfare housing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
..... I don't think most of the people who need help have family members or churches readily available to help them.....
So you think that a government agency that you must track down, find transportation to, stand in line for hours at, and complete paperwork, etc… is more readily available than a family member, church, or charity. I will bet it is easier to reach a family member and aren’t churches on almost every corner?

I will bet they pass numerous family members and churches on the way to the government agency.
VolDad is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:33 AM   #36 (permalink)
Wave yo hands in the aiya
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
I'm looking for a number that we spend annually on "lazy" people who make "poor choices" who end up poor and therefore just survive on government paychecks - you know, "welfare queens" and such. What's that total?
Is 1 not too many?
BigPapaVol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:54 AM   #37 (permalink)
a lover, not a fighter
 
TennNC's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by volinbham View Post
I think a big part of the problem is the "entitlement" mentality that we've created. You're right - we spend a huge % of total spending to provide entitlements based on belonging to some special class.

These entitlements don't go away. Instead, they grow and seep into a greater and greater portion of society. People now expect the government to be the back up for all their decisions and why not? Some politician will always tell you (us) it's not your (our) fault and introduce legislation to shift resources towards the "issue".
So, is rising gas prices one example? Should we tell people to suck it up? Or should the government intervene?
TennNC is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:55 AM   #38 (permalink)
say that one more time
 
KB5252's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ashland City,TN
Posts: 8,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
So, is rising gas prices one example? Should we tell people to suck it up? Or should the government intervene?
No, the government needs to get out of the way and let us produce!
KB5252 is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:11 AM   #39 (permalink)
a lover, not a fighter
 
TennNC's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol View Post
do you really think Jesus was talking about the financially poor? If I recall, your father is/was a pastor, maybe you should ask him to help you with what that particular beatitude was saying.

There is no "you should help the starving." That is simply a trite maxim. While I agree that help be made available, it is not a moral responsibility. We are all here to fend for ourselves, except for those with physical or mental disabilities. I'm all for helping those folks at every turn.
My father would absolutely tell me that a key tenet of Christianity, of Jesus' teachings, is to give to those in need as a general principle, whether that be a family member, a good friend, or a complete stranger.

Luke 3:11. And [John the Baptist] would answer and say to them, "Let the man with two tunics share with him who has none, and let him who has food do likewise."

How do you interpret that?
TennNC is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:14 AM   #40 (permalink)
doo doo doo
 
volinbham's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: looking out my backdoor
Posts: 12,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
So, is rising gas prices one example? Should we tell people to suck it up? Or should the government intervene?
Encouraging the development of alternate energy sources (or getting out of the way in the case of off-shore drilling) is within the scope. Giving rebates is not.
__________________
Who can take the country
Sprinkle it with change
Make everything fair when the wealth he rearranges
The Candy Man, the Candy man can

volinbham is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:17 AM   #41 (permalink)
a lover, not a fighter
 
TennNC's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol View Post
My parents grew up in sharecropping cotton farming families, 10 brothers and sisters each, poor as dirt, generally uneducated, but nobody cried for them. They put their noses down and worked for every little thing they could have. That mentality is absolutely missing in the Mandela approach to bettering the situation for the poor. As long as someone will show up with some assistance, it'll be alright. Call it harsh, but I'm much more about the lasting value in folks figuring out how to get there on their own, much like the give a man a fish....."
You're obviously financially independent, successful - probably among the wealthiest 1% of the world. How did you get the opportunity to attain that wealth? What happened between your parents' generation and yours to get out of poverty and into your current lifestyle?

And do you think everyone can do the same?
TennNC is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:19 AM   #42 (permalink)
a lover, not a fighter
 
TennNC's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by volinbham View Post
Encouraging the development of alternate energy sources (or getting out of the way in the case of off-shore drilling) is within the scope. Giving rebates is not.
What about invading a country with plenty of oil resources? Is that within the scope?
TennNC is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:21 AM   #43 (permalink)
a lover, not a fighter
 
TennNC's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaVol View Post
I'm not saying that all poor people are lazy. I'm saying the lazy are a substantial portion of the poor
How do you know this?
TennNC is offline   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:21 AM   #44 (permalink)
Wave yo hands in the aiya
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
My father would absolutely tell me that a key tenet of Christianity, of Jesus' teachings, is to give to those in need as a general principle, whether that be a family member, a good friend, or a complete stranger.

Luke 3:11. And [John the Baptist] would answer and say to them, "Let the man with two tunics share with him who has none, and let him who has food do likewise."

How do you interpret that?
I think they said let him who has means share with those without. Where this falls short is the definition of need? They don't define it, you didn't define it and we all have a different viewpoint.

Him who has none is a different guy to you and I. I'm all for helping those who justifiably have none. Otherwise, I'm all for those who have none but have the wherewithal to fill the gap, figuring it out.

I guess you're all for the blanket statement that it's a moral responsibility to give to everyone who deserves it and that we should all have relatively equal financial outcomes.
BigPapaVol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:23 AM   #45 (permalink)
Wave yo hands in the aiya
 
BigPapaVol's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennNC View Post
You're obviously financially independent, successful - probably among the wealthiest 1% of the world. How did you get the opportunity to attain that wealth? What happened between your parents' generation and yours to get out of poverty and into your current lifestyle?

And do you think everyone can do the same?
My parents shoved education down my throat and told me to get a scholarship or lump it.

Everyone can't do the same. Everyone doesn't need to do the same. Everyone can make the effort it takes to provide for themselves. Those incapable due to physical or mental infirmity, again, I'm all for helping.
BigPapaVol is online now   TOP Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LG, I Completely Forgot...... BigPapaVol Tennessee Vols 75 11-13-2007 09:43 PM
This is completely moot....But Oh what could have been.... blamie Tennessee Vols 7 09-24-2007 02:08 PM
Completely hilarious and completely not safe for work milohimself The Pub 9 05-22-2007 01:25 PM
And now for something completely different... vader The Endzone 0 03-28-2007 10:29 PM
Chapelle Has Completely Flipped checkerboard_charly The Pub 17 05-16-2005 06:25 PM

 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24