Carter Page FISA warrant request released.

[carlos86]

The full 412 page FISA application for surveillance directed against Carter W. Page, pursuant to Title I of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, released under FOIA.

This is the first ever Title I application and order release since the creation of FISA.

It states that in October of 2016 Page was identified as an agent of a foreign power (The Russian Federation) and that he knowingly engages in clandestine activities on behalf of the Russian Federation.


https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4614708/Carter-Page-FISA-Application.pdf

 

[NorthDallas40]

Meh. Let’s see the supporting source data for the warrant

 

[Mick]

So he's not a double secret agent?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Heavily redacted...

 

[Grand Vol]

Heavily redacted...

That's an understatement.

 

[NorthDallas40]

So he's not a double secret agent?

Your world is crushed isn’t it.

 

[Mick]

Your world is crushed isn’t it.

lol. I couldn't read enough to tell.

 

[NorthDallas40]

lol. I couldn't read enough to tell.

It’s a “here’s a warrant we can’t tell you why tho” redacted doc. Sticking with meh for now.

 

[carlos86]

It’s a “here’s a warrant we can’t tell you why tho” redacted doc. Sticking with meh for now.

Well, it was a top secret document. sources and methods for the most part but for "Source 1" are redacted which they should be. The only part that was classified secret was the judge’s signature. I found these pages interesting.

 

[Mick]

It’s a “here’s a warrant we can’t tell you why tho” redacted doc. Sticking with meh for now.

This release is a Nunesburger but still the DOJ and the pro trump activists have put great emphasis on Carter Page. Why? IDK but it's interesting and mysterious still yet.

Or am I wrong and the likes of Nunes droped this a few months back.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Heavily redacted...

Well, of course it is! Sheesh.

 

[BowlBrother85]

This release is a Nunesburger but still the DOJ and the pro trump activists have put great emphasis on Carter Page. Why? IDK but it's interesting and mysterious still yet.

Or am I wrong and the likes of Nunes droped this a few months back.

This gets back to that Spygate bunch of nothing.

 

[carlos86]

Remember when the President said George Papadopoulos was "young, low level volunteer named George, who has already proven to be a liar"

 

[carlos86]

"No one in my campaign colluded with the Russians."

 

[Grand Vol]

I hope Carlos reads all 427 pages (likely about a hundred by the time he's done) and gives us the Cliff Notes.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Remember when the President said George Papadopoulos was "young, low level volunteer named George, who has already proven to be a liar"

Wow. I doubt that is what Nunes was hoping to see.

 

[NorthDallas40]

If you don’t bring the supporting data to validate the warrant don’t chest thump about a heavily redacted document.

Yeah we know you’re in the bathroom BB touching yourself over this but get a grip.(a very small grip I’m sure. &#128514

 

[Vol0725]

From the group that went to court to get it.

[twitter]1020829921768280064[/twitter]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Has Carter Page been charged with a crime yet?

 

[Vol0725]

Can’t wait to see how they sweep this under the rug.


[twitter]1020828400150294529[/twitter]

 

[NorthDallas40]

Lol this could be awesome if Trump declassified all the related info and they had to respond to a FOIA request with no redacted docs. 😂

 

[Mick]

I do find Carter Page's involvement interesting. West Point, strategically placed in the Energy sector of Russia, strategically placed in the campaign.

 

[Weezer]

"No one in my campaign colluded with the Russians."

Key word is believe. Believing something doesn't make it true. That's why proof is required.

 

[golfballs]

So tell me libs, Carter Page is either the most cunning spy ever, or his civil liberties were violated for political purposes.

 

[carlos86]

From the group that went to court to get it.

[twitter]1020829921768280064[/twitter]

Judicial Watch didn't even file an FOIA request the New York Times did.

FOIA Case: NYT/Savage v. Department of Justice, 18-cv-2054 (SDNY)
FISC Case: In Re Orders and Records of This Court Related to The Surveillance of Carter Page, Misc. 18-01 (FISC)