Notice how the mainstream media never errors in Trump's favor?

#1
K

K9Buck

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
171
Likes
116
#1
They make countless mistakes but they're never in Trump's favor. Ever notice that? Someone on Twitter shared this question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2
#2
K9Buck said:
They make countless mistakes but they're never in Trump's favor. Ever notice that? Someone on Twitter shared this question.
Click to expand...

Kinda makes you think the press don't like Trump or his agenda. Maybe they wanted a screeching, loony, female leftist or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3
#3
K9Buck said:
They make countless mistakes but they're never in Trump's favor. Ever notice that? Someone on Twitter shared this question.
Click to expand...

I believe FOX has had to retract several stories that were pro Trump or anti dissent.

If you only watch Hannity then I could see how one might assume that though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#5
#5
K9Buck said:
They make countless mistakes but they're never in Trump's favor. Ever notice that? Someone on Twitter shared this question.
Click to expand...

Geez. You’re the worst poster in this forum. And that’s really saying something. At least most in here link to some obscure webpage to semi-back up their story.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#7
#7
volfan_89 said:
Geez. Your the worst poster in this forum. And that’s really saying something. At least most in here link to some obscure webpage to semi-back up their story.
Click to expand...

Please put me on "ignore". I will do the same with you. Have a nice life.
 
#9
#9
K9Buck said:
Please put me on "ignore". I will do the same with you. Have a nice life.
Click to expand...

If you find yourself pasting this response to so many people in a 24 hour span, maybe they aren't the problem.

Your posts suck, dude. Take this sh*tshow to some far right subreddit where you and your fellow knuckledraggers can stroke each others Breitbart e-peens until the cows come home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#10
#10
zaqhhh said:
I believe FOX has had to retract several stories that were pro Trump or anti dissent.

If you only watch Hannity then I could see how one might assume that though.
Click to expand...

They did have to retract a Seth Rich conspiracy theory report in May being advanced by Hannity which was also posted on their site.

Also, it's hard to miss the hypocrisy on Fox News in regard to sexual harassment/assault. They have rarely mentioned the incredible number of their own former colleagues (Lis Weihl, Gretchen Carlson, Andrea Tantaros, Megyn Kelly, Julie Roginsky, Juliet Huddy, Laurie Dhue) who have either been paid multi-million dollar settlements or accused Bill O'Reilly and Roger Ailes of harassment/assault. Yet, they were quick to pounce on the stories of Matt Lauer and Charlie Rose who were on other networks. Their official stance on Roy Moore seems to be that he is entitled to the benefit of the doubt... though I doubt that would be their position were he a democrat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#11
#11
DinkinFlicka said:
If you find yourself pasting this response to so many people in a 24 hour span, maybe they aren't the problem.

Your posts suck, dude. Take this sh*tshow to some far right subreddit where you and your fellow knuckledraggers can stroke each others Breitbart e-peens until the cows come home.
Click to expand...

Actually, the truth of the matter is that leftist libtards like you can't tolerate someone who presents a view that differs from your narrow world-view. If you don't like what I post, then put me on "ignore", that way you don't have to cry constantly like the sniveling little k*nt that you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#13
#13
BowlBrother85 said:
They did have to retract a Seth Rich conspiracy theory report in May being advanced by Hannity which was also posted on their site.

Also, it's hard to miss the hypocrisy on Fox News in regard to sexual harassment/assault. They have rarely mentioned the incredible number of their own former colleagues (Lis Weihl, Gretchen Carlson, Andrea Tantaros, Megyn Kelly, Julie Roginsky, Juliet Huddy, Laurie Dhue) who have either been paid multi-million dollar settlements or accused Bill O'Reilly and Roger Ailes of harassment/assault. Yet, they were quick to pounce on the stories of Matt Lauer and Charlie Rose who were on other networks. Their official stance on Roy Moore seems to be that he is entitled to the benefit of the doubt... though I doubt that would be their position were he a democrat.
Click to expand...

None of which addresses the point made by Mike Cernovich. When has the MSM been wrong about something on Trump that cast him in a POSITIVE light? I can't think of any. Can you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
K9Buck said:
Fox News is NOT a part of the msm. Can you come up with something from the msm?
Click to expand...

I feel like you and many other Trump fans use the word MSM to denote outlets that aren't explicitly pro-Trump.

Instead, I will give you a prominent case of the "MSM" actually doing their job when whackjobs try to support our president's paranoia that the media will run anything that isn't supportive of him or his candidates.

Woman Tried to Dupe Washington Post With False Claim About Roy Moore, Paper Says - The New York Times
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
K9Buck said:
Fox News is NOT a part of the msm. Can you come up with something from the msm?
Click to expand...

How do you define msm? They sure boast about their ratings more than any other network. The Fox Entertainment Group of networks (also including the Big Ten Network and Fox Sports, FS 1 and FS 2, FX, FXX, FX movie channel and the Nat Geo channels) are definitely a main stream presence on cable television and Rupert Murdoch (who also owns the Wall Street Journal) is by anyone's standard - a main stream media mogul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#18
#18
K9Buck said:
Actually, the truth of the matter is that leftist libtards like you can't tolerate someone who presents a view that differs from your narrow world-view. If you don't like what I post, then put me on "ignore", that way you don't have to cry constantly like the sniveling little k*nt that you are.
Click to expand...
You will enjoy your day much better with Dink on ignore. That's what I did. He can get very ugly.

I wish you wouldn't quote him. Then, I wouldn't hear a peep from the little creep. I am blissfully unaware of his very existence unless someone quotes him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#19
#19
BowlBrother85 said:
How do you define msm? They sure boast about their ratings more than any other network. The Fox Entertainment Group of networks (also including the Big Ten Network and Fox Sports, FS 1 and FS 2, FX, FXX, FX movie channel and the Nat Geo channels) are definitely a main stream presence on cable television and Rupert Murdoch (who also owns the Wall Street Journal) is by anyone's standard - a main stream media mogul.
Click to expand...

Fox News's viewership pales compared the the big three of ABC, NBC and CBS. It's not close.
 
#20
#20
K9Buck said:
Fox News is NOT a part of the msm. Can you come up with something from the msm?
Click to expand...

Oh okay. Bring up mainstream media and then say they’re not mainstream media. Ever moving the goalposts. Something both sides are guilty of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#21
#21
1972 Grad said:
You will enjoy your day much better with Dink on ignore. That's what I did. He can get very ugly.

I wish you wouldn't quote him. Then, I wouldn't hear a peep from the little creep. I am blissfully unaware of his very existence unless someone quotes him.
Click to expand...

It's nice to hear a friendly voice around here, for a change. There are a lot of leftists and, where there are leftists, there is a lot of anger and hatred. They have my pity. I'll probably have to put him on "ignore". I enjoy good, honest, give-and-take discussion. Guys like him aren't here for that, apparently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#22
#22
K9Buck said:
It's nice to hear a friendly voice around here, for a change. There are a lot of leftists and, where there are leftists, there is a lot of anger and hatred. They have my pity. I'll probably have to put him on "ignore". I enjoy good, honest, give-and-take discussion. Guys like him aren't here for that, apparently.
Click to expand...
He REALLY hates people over 50.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#23
#23
zaqhhh said:
I feel like you and many other Trump fans use the word MSM to denote outlets that aren't explicitly pro-Trump.

Instead, I will give you a prominent case of the "MSM" actually doing their job when whackjobs try to support our president's paranoia that the media will run anything that isn't supportive of him or his candidates.

Woman Tried to Dupe Washington Post With False Claim About Roy Moore, Paper Says - The New York Times
Click to expand...

Yes, I am aware of that story. That was a good job by the Washington Post to vet her story - for a change. James O'Keefe has caught many liberal media outlets in a lot of lies. The media has gotten wise to him and are getting tired of getting embarrassed and are being a little more selective of what they publish.

Here is a recent instance wherein the Washington Post had to issue a retraction on a story they did concerning O'Keefe. He has a "Wall of Shame" of retractions by numerous, liberal media outlets.

O'Keefe Frames #FakeNews WaPo's RETRACTION - YouTube
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top