lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 70,382
- Likes
- 41,396
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/15/politics/trump-london-attack/index.html
Let's say he knows that Scotland Yard knows who the bomber is. Why on Earth would you tweet that out to let him know that?!?! Just so you could score cheap political points here at home to support what we all know is in his heart, which is to broaden the ban as much as he can?
This is so embarrassing, using this incident and probable intelligence which should not be shared just for political gain. Not even you guys can defend this level of douchbaggery by him.
"Another attack in London by a loser terrorist." he tweeted. "These are sick and demented people who were in the sights of Scotland Yard. Must be proactive!" Added Trump: "The travel ban into the United States should be far larger, tougher and more specific-but stupidly, that would not be politically correct!"
The travel ban, of course, is Trump's executive order aimed at blocking people from six majority-Muslim countries from entering the United States, a necessary step in combating terrorism, according to the President. But, at least in the early stages of this London investigation, there is no evidence to suggest where the attackers hailed from or what their motives were. All we know, according to British police, is that it is being investigated as a terrorist incident.
Asked about Trump's tweet that the London tube attack was perpetrated by people known to the security services, British Prime Minister Theresa May said it is "never helpful for anyone to speculate on what is an ongoing investigation."
Trump's willingness to jump to conclusions about the London incident stands in stark contrast to his defense of his unwillingness to fully condemn the white supremacists and neo-Nazis behind the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, last month.
Trump, who initially (and repeatedly) said that there were violent people on both sides in Charlottesville, attributed that response to a desire to gather all the facts before offering an opinion. (Yes, I know this doesn't make a ton of logical sense.)
"I wanted to make sure, unlike most politicians, that what I said was correct, not make a quick statement," Trump explained to reporters. "The statement I made on Saturday, the first statement, was a fine statement. But you don't make statements that direct unless you know the facts. It takes a little while to get the facts."
It's impossible to square "you don't make statements that direct unless you know the facts" to what Trump did Friday morning in regard to the London attack.
What's clear from a look at the way Trump has responded to a series of high-profile incidents -- primarily terror attacks -- since being elected President is that he is more than willing to leap on them well before all the facts are known if they reinforce something he already believes. If they go against his views, he is far less willing to do so.
Let's say he knows that Scotland Yard knows who the bomber is. Why on Earth would you tweet that out to let him know that?!?! Just so you could score cheap political points here at home to support what we all know is in his heart, which is to broaden the ban as much as he can?
This is so embarrassing, using this incident and probable intelligence which should not be shared just for political gain. Not even you guys can defend this level of douchbaggery by him.