Orangeslice13
RockyTop is back, Let’s Go!!
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 89,751
- Likes
- 99,564
https://aeon.co/ideas/why-religion-is-not-going-away-and-science-will-not-destroy-it
It has always been my opinion that The creator is a G-d of laws. Commonly referred to as Torah.
It would make sense that the creation would be based on a natural law.
In my opinion when scripture and science don't agree there are one of two problems 1) misinterpreting scripture/ adding things that are not there. Ex: "the world is 7000 years old" or 2) science hasn't progressed to answer the question.
The article seems to suggest that secularism is problem for science. This is a line of thinking I hadn't previously considered.
So who is worse for the progress of science....religion or secularism?
It has always been my opinion that The creator is a G-d of laws. Commonly referred to as Torah.
It would make sense that the creation would be based on a natural law.
In my opinion when scripture and science don't agree there are one of two problems 1) misinterpreting scripture/ adding things that are not there. Ex: "the world is 7000 years old" or 2) science hasn't progressed to answer the question.
The article seems to suggest that secularism is problem for science. This is a line of thinking I hadn't previously considered.
So who is worse for the progress of science....religion or secularism?